21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A descriptive epidemiological study on the patterns of occupational injuries in a coastal area and a mountain area in Southern China

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , , 1 , 4
      BMJ Open
      BMJ Group

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          This study compared patterns of occupational injuries in two different areas, coastal (industrial) and mountain (agricultural), in Southern China to provide information for development of occupational injury prevention measures in China.

          Design

          Descriptive epidemiological study.

          Setting

          Data were obtained from the Hospital Injury Surveillance System based on hospital data collected from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2008.

          Participants

          Cases of occupational injury, defined as injury that occurred when the activity indicated was work.

          Outcome measures

          Distribution and differences of patterns of occupational injuries between the two areas.

          Results

          Men were more likely than women to experience occupational injuries, and there was no difference in the two areas (p=0.112). In the coastal area, occupational injury occurred more in the 21–30-year age group, but in the mountain area, it was the 41–50-year age group (p<0.001). Occupational injuries in the two areas differed by location of hometown, education and occupation (all p<0.001). Occupational injuries peaked differently in the month of the year in the two areas (p<0.001). Industrial and construction areas were the most frequent locations where occupational injuries occurred (p<0.001). Most occupational injuries were unintentional and not serious, and patients could go home after treatment. The two areas also differed in external causes and consequences of occupational injuries.

          Conclusions

          The differing patterns of occupational injuries in the coastal and mountain areas in Southern China suggest that different preventive measures should be developed. Results are relevant to other developing countries that have industrial and agricultural areas.

          Article summary

          Article focus
          • Occupational injury is a serious problem causing 350 000 deaths and 270 million serious non-fatal injuries globally every year.

          • This study is the first attempt in China to compare the characteristics and risk factors of occupational injuries in a coastal area (industrial) and a mountain area (agricultural).

          • Occupational injury patterns were found to differ in the two areas, in terms of location of hometown, education, occupation, month of the year, location of injuries, external causes and consequences.

          Key messages
          • Our findings provide important information for developing occupational injury prevention programmes in industrial and agricultural areas.

          • Accumulation of occupational injury studies steadily builds the epidemiological information base on which to develop interventions.

          • Identification of the local geographic patterns of occupational injuries helps to import existing proven interventions from other similar geographic areas.

          Strengths and limitations of this study
          • The Hospital Injury Surveillance System that we established in Southern China has started to produce useful data for occupational injury prevention.

          • The system still lacks important useful information such as full occupational history, evaluation measures of data accuracy and completeness, and rate information.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The global burden due to occupational injury.

          Occupational injuries are a public health problem, estimated to kill more than 300,000 workers worldwide every year and to cause many more cases of disability. We estimate the global burden of fatal and non-fatal unintentional occupational injuries for the year 2000. The economically active population (EAP) of about 2.9 billion workers was used as a surrogate of the population at risk for occupational injuries. Occupational unintentional injury fatality rates for insured workers, by country, were used to estimate WHO regional rates. These were applied to regional EAP to estimate the number of deaths. In addition to mortality, the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost, which measure both morbidity and mortality, were calculated for 14 WHO regions. Worldwide, hazardous conditions in the workplace were responsible for a minimum of 312,000 fatal unintentional occupational injuries. Together, fatal and non-fatal occupational injuries resulted in about 10.5 million DALYs; that is, about 3.5 years of healthy life are lost per 1,000 workers every year globally. Occupational risk factors are responsible for 8.8% of the global burden of mortality due to unintentional injuries and 8.1% of DALYs due to this outcome. Occupational injuries constitute a substantial global burden. However, our findings greatly underestimate the impact of occupational risk factors leading to injuries in the overall burden of disease. Our estimates could not include intentional injuries at work, or commuting injuries, due to lack of global data. Additional factors contributing to grave underestimation of occupational injuries include limited insurance coverage of workers and substantial under-reporting of fatal injuries in record-keeping systems globally. About 113,000 deaths were probably missed in our analyses due to under-reporting alone. It is clear that known prevention strategies need to be implemented widely to diminish the avoidable burden of injuries in the workplace. 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effectiveness of interventions for preventing injuries in the construction industry: a systematic review.

            Occupational injury rates among construction workers are the highest among the major industries. A number of injury-prevention interventions have been proposed, yet the effectiveness of these is uncertain. Thus a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for preventing occupational injuries among construction workers was conducted. Seven databases were searched, from the earliest available dates through June 2006, for published findings of injury prevention in construction studies. Acceptable study designs included RCTs; controlled before-after studies; and interrupted time series (ITS). Effect sizes of similar interventions were pooled into a meta-analysis in January 2007. Of 7522 titles found, four ITS studies and one controlled ITS study met the inclusion criteria. The overall methodologic quality was low. No indications of publication bias were found. Findings from a safety-campaign study and a drug-free-workplace study indicated that both interventions significantly reduced the level and the trend of injuries. Three studies that evaluated legislation did not decrease the level (ES 0.69; 95% CI=-1.70, 3.09) and made the downward trend (ES 0.28; 95% CI=0.05, 0.51) of injuries less favorable. Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of a multifaceted safety campaign and a multifaceted drug program, but no evidence was found that legislation is effective to prevent nonfatal or fatal injuries in the construction industry.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gender and age distribution of occupational fatalities in Taiwan.

              This study analyzed fatal occupational injuries in Taiwan. One thousand eight hundred ninety work-related accident reports filed in the years 1996-1999 were extracted from the annual publication of the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA). These data were analyzed in terms of gender, age and work experience of the accident victim as well as accident type and the work-related source of injury to identify significant contributing factors. The CLA data showed that work-related falls were the leading cause of work-related fatalities in both male and female workers (38.2% of male victims and 39.2% of female victims). Gender differences were also noted in the accident type and age of the injured workers. Male workers had a significantly higher prevalence of fatal occupational injuries than female workers throughout the analyzed period (7.4 compared to 0.9 per 100,000 full-time workers). Young males aged 24 years or less had the highest rate of fatal occupational injuries. The finding that gender and age are major factors in occupational injuries is a significant finding in the field of occupational safety and may be helpful for developing accident prevention programs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2012
                18 June 2012
                18 June 2012
                : 2
                : 3
                : e000965
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Injury Prevention Research Centre, Medical College of Shantou University, Shantou, China
                [2 ]Shenzhen Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen, China
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]Zhejiang Provincial Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Hangzhou, China
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dr Bernard Choi; bernard.choi@ 123456utoronto.ca
                Article
                bmjopen-2012-000965
                10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000965
                3378941
                22710129
                841f354a-a0ab-482b-931b-a24c1fcedb38
                © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 10 February 2012
                : 14 May 2012
                Categories
                Occupational and Environmental Medicine
                Research
                1506
                1716
                1692

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article