0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimal design of cluster randomised trials with continuous recruitment and prospective baseline period

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Cluster randomised trials, like individually randomised trials, may benefit from a baseline period of data collection. We consider trials in which clusters prospectively recruit or identify participants as a continuous process over a given calendar period, and ask whether and for how long investigators should collect baseline data as part of the trial, in order to maximise precision.

          Methods:

          We show how to calculate and plot the variance of the treatment effect estimator for different lengths of baseline period in a range of scenarios, and offer general advice.

          Results:

          In some circumstances it is optimal not to include a baseline, while in others there is an optimal duration for the baseline. All other things being equal, the circumstances where it is preferable not to include a baseline period are those with a smaller recruitment rate, smaller intracluster correlation, greater decay in the intracluster correlation over time, or wider transition period between recruitment under control and intervention conditions.

          Conclusion:

          The variance of the treatment effect estimator can be calculated numerically, and plotted against the duration of baseline to inform design. It would be of interest to extend these investigations to cluster randomised trial designs with more than two randomised sequences of control and intervention condition, including stepped wedge designs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials.

            The sample size required for a cluster randomised trial is inflated compared with an individually randomised trial because outcomes of participants from the same cluster are correlated. Sample size calculations for longitudinal cluster randomised trials (including stepped wedge trials) need to take account of at least two levels of clustering: the clusters themselves and times within clusters. We derive formulae for sample size for repeated cross-section and closed cohort cluster randomised trials with normally distributed outcome measures, under a multilevel model allowing for variation between clusters and between times within clusters. Our formulae agree with those previously described for special cases such as crossover and analysis of covariance designs, although simulation suggests that the formulae could underestimate required sample size when the number of clusters is small. Whether using a formula or simulation, a sample size calculation requires estimates of nuisance parameters, which in our model include the intracluster correlation, cluster autocorrelation, and individual autocorrelation. A cluster autocorrelation less than 1 reflects a situation where individuals sampled from the same cluster at different times have less correlated outcomes than individuals sampled from the same cluster at the same time. Nuisance parameters could be estimated from time series obtained in similarly clustered settings with the same outcome measure, using analysis of variance to estimate variance components. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Trials
                Clin Trials
                CTJ
                spctj
                Clinical Trials (London, England)
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1740-7745
                1740-7753
                8 March 2021
                April 2021
                : 18
                : 2
                : 147-157
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Clinical Trials & Methodology, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
                [2 ]MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Richard Hooper, Centre for Clinical Trials & Methodology, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK. Email: r.l.hooper@ 123456qmul.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-0917
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8968-5963
                Article
                10.1177_1740774520976564
                10.1177/1740774520976564
                8010895
                33685241
                8447d8d8-e49b-422e-986b-826c2535c9e3
                © The Author(s) 2021

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Health Foundation, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000724;
                Funded by: Medical Research Council, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000265;
                Award ID: MC_UU_12023/29
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                Medicine
                efficient design,group randomised trials,power,sample size
                Medicine
                efficient design, group randomised trials, power, sample size

                Comments

                Comment on this article