0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determinants of multimorbidity in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of longitudinal studies and discovery of evidence gaps

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Multimorbidity—the coexistence of at least two chronic health conditions within the same individual—is an important global health challenge. In high‐income countries (HICs), multimorbidity is dominated by non‐communicable diseases (NCDs); whereas, the situation may be different in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), where chronic communicable diseases remain prominent. The aim of this systematic review was to identify determinants (including risk and protective factors) and potential mechanisms underlying multimorbidity from published longitudinal studies across diverse population‐based or community‐dwelling populations in LMICs. We systematically searched three electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and Global Health) using pre‐defined search terms and selection criteria, complemented by hand‐searching. All titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened by two reviewers from a pool of four researchers. Data extraction and reporting were according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Methodological quality and risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Data were summarized using narrative synthesis. The search yielded 1782 records. Of the 52 full‐text articles included for review, 8 longitudinal population‐based studies were included for final data synthesis. Almost all studies were conducted in Asia, with only one from South America and none from Africa. All studies were published in the last decade, with half published in the year 2021. The definitions used for multimorbidity were heterogeneous, including 3–16 chronic conditions per study. The leading chronic conditions were heart disease, stroke, and diabetes, and there was a lack of consideration of mental health conditions (MHCs), infectious diseases, and undernutrition. Prospectively evaluated determinants included socio‐economic status, markers of social inequities, childhood adversity, lifestyle behaviors, obesity, dyslipidemia, and disability. This review revealed a paucity of evidence from LMICs and a geographical bias in the distribution of multimorbidity research. Longitudinal research into epidemiological aspects of multimorbidity is warranted to build up scientific evidence in regions beyond Asia. Such evidence can provide a detailed picture of disease development, with important implications for community, clinical, and interventions in LMICs. The heterogeneity in study designs, exposures, outcomes, and statistical methods observed in the present review calls for greater methodological standardisation while conducting epidemiological studies on multimorbidity. The limited evidence for MHCs, infectious diseases, and undernutrition as components of multimorbidity calls for a more comprehensive definition of multimorbidity globally.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                michelle.tanmunchieng@gmail.com
                matthew.prina@kcl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Obes Rev
                Obes Rev
                10.1111/(ISSN)1467-789X
                OBR
                Obesity Reviews
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1467-7881
                1467-789X
                17 December 2023
                February 2024
                : 25
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/obr.v25.2 )
                : e13661
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK
                [ 2 ] Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences Monash University Malaysia Sunway City Selangor Malaysia
                [ 3 ] South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) Monash University Malaysia Sunway City Selangor Malaysia
                [ 4 ] Victorian Heart Institute Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus Clayton Victoria Australia
                [ 5 ] Psychogeriatric Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Medical School Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) São Paulo Brazil
                [ 6 ] Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT‐Africa) Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Ethiopia
                [ 7 ] Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics Jimma University Jimma Ethiopia
                [ 8 ] Department of Economics, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The Open University Milton Keynes UK
                [ 9 ] Global Mental Health, Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences King's College London London UK
                [ 10 ] Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Ethiopia
                [ 11 ] Edinburgh Dementia Prevention University of Edinburgh and Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK
                [ 12 ] Department of Social Medicine, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine Ohio University Athens Ohio USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Michelle M. C. Tan and Matthew Prina, Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre (H1.05), De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK.

                Email: tan_mun.chieng@ 123456kcl.ac.uk and matthew.prina@ 123456kcl.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4806-7939
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2193-5839
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7937-3226
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-6256
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0387-6406
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0898-2729
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4516-0337
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-3263
                Article
                OBR13661
                10.1111/obr.13661
                11046426
                38105610
                844b6765-5477-48e7-a02d-4c24b83d3d8d
                © 2023 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 October 2023
                : 26 October 2022
                : 07 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 17, Words: 10560
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council (UK Research and Innovation) (King's College London) , doi 10.13039/501100000265;
                Award ID: MR/T037423/1
                Categories
                Review
                REVIEWS
                Public Health
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.0 mode:remove_FC converted:26.04.2024

                Medicine
                determinants,longitudinal studies,low‐ and middle‐income countries,multimorbidity
                Medicine
                determinants, longitudinal studies, low‐ and middle‐income countries, multimorbidity

                Comments

                Comment on this article