16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Most research on how to enhance response rates in physician surveys has been done using paper surveys. Uncertainties remain regarding how to enhance response rates in Internet-based surveys.

          Objective

          To evaluate the impact of a low-cost nonmonetary incentive and paper mail reminders (formal letter and postcard) on response rates in Internet-based physician surveys.

          Methods

          We executed a factorial-design randomized experiment while conducting a nationally representative Internet-based physician survey. We invited 3966 physicians (randomly selected from a commercial database of all licensed US physicians) via email to complete an Internet-based survey. We used 2 randomly assigned email messages: one message offered a book upon survey completion, whereas the other did not mention the book but was otherwise identical. All nonrespondents received several email reminders. Some physicians were further assigned at random to receive 1 reminder via paper mail (either a postcard or a letter) or no paper reminder. The primary outcome of this study was the survey response rate.

          Results

          Of the 3966 physicians who were invited, 451 (11.4%) responded to at least one survey question and 336 (8.5%) completed the entire survey. Of those who were offered a book, 345/2973 (11.6%) responded compared with 106/993 (10.7%) who were not offered a book (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.38, P=.42). Regarding the paper mail reminder, 168/1572 (10.7%) letter recipients, 148/1561 (9.5%) postcard recipients, and 69/767 (9.0%) email-only recipients responded ( P=.35). The response rate for those receiving letters or postcards was similar (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44, P=.26).

          Conclusions

          Offering a modest nonmonetary incentive and sending a paper reminder did not improve survey response rate. Further research on how to enhance response rates in Internet-based physician surveys is needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.

              Surveys involving health care providers are characterized by low and declining response rates (RRs), and researchers have utilized various strategies to increase survey RRs among health professionals. Based on 48 studies with 156 subgroups of within-study conditions, a multilevel meta-regression analysis was conducted to summarize the effects of different strategies employed in surveys of health professionals. An estimated overall survey RR among health professionals was 0.53 with a significant downward trend during the last half century. Of the variables that were examined, mode of data collection, incentives, and number of follow-up attempts were all found to be significantly related to RR. The mail survey mode was more effective in improving RR, compared to the online or web survey mode. Relative to the non-incentive subgroups, subgroups receiving monetary incentives were more likely to respond, while nonmonetary incentive groups were not significantly different from non-incentive groups. When number of follow-ups was considered, the one or two attempts of follow-up were found to be effective in increasing survey RR among health professionals. Having noted challenges associated with surveying health professionals, researchers must make every effort to improve access to their target population by implementing appropriate incentive- and design-based strategies demonstrated to improve participation rates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J. Med. Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                September 2016
                16 September 2016
                : 18
                : 9
                : e244
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Mayo Clinic Online Learning Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester, MNUnited States
                [2] 2Knowledge Delivery Center Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester, MNUnited States
                [3] 3Division of General Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester, MNUnited States
                [4] 4Survey Research Center Mayo Clinic Rochester, MNUnited States
                [5] 5Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics Mayo Clinic Rochester, MNUnited States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: David A Cook cook.david33@ 123456mayo.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-4633
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1371-5139
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-0437
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-5023
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-3805
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-5068
                Article
                v18i9e244
                10.2196/jmir.6318
                5045523
                27637296
                8457244f-8ca2-4c7f-b40f-4b1afbb1b833
                ©David A Cook, Christopher M Wittich, Wendlyn L Daniels, Colin P West, Ann M Harris, Timothy J Beebe. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 16.09.2016.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 5 July 2016
                : 27 July 2016
                : 1 August 2016
                : 3 August 2016
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                Medicine
                surveys and questionnaires,survey methods,questionnaire design
                Medicine
                surveys and questionnaires, survey methods, questionnaire design

                Comments

                Comment on this article