35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      State-dependent electrostatic interactions of S4 arginines with E1 in S2 during Kv7.1 activation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The voltage-sensing domain of voltage-gated channels is comprised of four transmembrane helices (S1–S4), with conserved positively charged residues in S4 moving across the membrane in response to changes in transmembrane voltage. Although it has been shown that positive charges in S4 interact with negative countercharges in S2 and S3 to facilitate protein maturation, how these electrostatic interactions participate in channel gating remains unclear. We studied a mutation in Kv7.1 (also known as KCNQ1 or KvLQT1) channels associated with long QT syndrome (E1K in S2) and found that reversal of the charge at E1 eliminates macroscopic current without inhibiting protein trafficking to the membrane. Pairing E1R with individual charge reversal mutations of arginines in S4 (R1–R4) can restore current, demonstrating that R1–R4 interact with E1. After mutating E1 to cysteine, we probed E1C with charged methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reagents. MTS reagents could not modify E1C in the absence of KCNE1. With KCNE1, (2-sulfonatoethyl) MTS (MTSES) could modify E1C, but [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl] MTS (MTSET) + could not, confirming the presence of a positively charged environment around E1C that allows approach by MTSES but repels MTSET +. We could change the local electrostatic environment of E1C by making charge reversal and/or neutralization mutations of R1 and R4, such that MTSET + modified these constructs depending on activation states of the voltage sensor. Our results confirm the interaction between E1 and the fourth arginine in S4 (R4) predicted from open-state crystal structures of Kv channels and reveal an E1–R1 interaction in the resting state. Thus, E1 engages in electrostatic interactions with arginines in S4 sequentially during the gating movement of S4. These electrostatic interactions contribute energetically to voltage-dependent gating and are important in setting the limits for S4 movement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Voltage sensor of Kv1.2: structural basis of electromechanical coupling.

          Voltage-dependent ion channels contain voltage sensors that allow them to switch between nonconductive and conductive states over the narrow range of a few hundredths of a volt. We investigated the mechanism by which these channels sense cell membrane voltage by determining the x-ray crystal structure of a mammalian Shaker family potassium ion (K+) channel. The voltage-dependent K+ channel Kv1.2 grew three-dimensional crystals, with an internal arrangement that left the voltage sensors in an apparently native conformation, allowing us to reach three important conclusions. First, the voltage sensors are essentially independent domains inside the membrane. Second, they perform mechanical work on the pore through the S4-S5 linker helices, which are positioned to constrict or dilate the S6 inner helices of the pore. Third, in the open conformation, two of the four conserved Arg residues on S4 are on a lipid-facing surface and two are buried in the voltage sensor. The structure offers a simple picture of how membrane voltage influences the open probability of the channel.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Contribution of the S4 segment to gating charge in the Shaker K+ channel.

            Voltage-activated ion channels respond to changes in membrane voltage by coupling the movement of charges to channel opening. A K+ channel-specific radioligand was designed and used to determine the origin of these gating charges in the Shaker K+ channel. Opening of a Shaker K+ channel is associated with a displacement of 13.6 electron charge units. Gating charge contributions were determined for six of the seven positive charges in the S4 segment, an unusual amino acid sequence in voltage-activated cation channels consisting of repeating basic residues at every third position. Charge-neutralizing mutations of the first four positive charges led to large decreases (approximately 4 electron charge units each) in the gating charge; however, the gating charge of Shaker delta 10, a Shaker K+ channel with 10 altered nonbasic residues in its S4 segment, was found to be identical to the wild-type channel. These findings show that movement of the NH2-terminal half but not the CO2H-terminal end of the S4 segment underlies gating charge, and that this portion of the S4 segment appears to move across the entire transmembrane voltage difference in association with channel activation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Voltage-sensing residues in the S2 and S4 segments of the Shaker K+ channel.

              The activation of Shaker K+ channels is steeply voltage dependent. To determine whether conserved charged amino acids in putative transmembrane segments S2, S3, and S4 contribute to the gating charge of the channel, the total gating charge movement per channel was measured in channels containing neutralization mutations. Of eight residues tested, four contributed significantly to the gating charge: E293, an acidic residue in S2, and R365, R368, and R371, three basic residues in the S4 segment. The results indicate that these residues are a major component of the voltage sensor. Furthermore, the S4 segment is not solely responsible for gating charge movement in Shaker K+ channels.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Gen Physiol
                J. Gen. Physiol
                jgp
                The Journal of General Physiology
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0022-1295
                1540-7748
                June 2010
                : 135
                : 6
                : 595-606
                Affiliations
                Department of Biomedical Engineering and Cardiac Bioelectricity and Arrhythmia Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Jianmin Cui: jcui@ 123456biomed.wustl.edu
                Article
                201010408
                10.1085/jgp.201010408
                2888051
                20479111
                85d9cf6c-79af-47c6-89b6-83f209f2712a
                © 2010 Wu et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

                History
                : 29 January 2010
                : 16 April 2010
                Categories
                Article

                Anatomy & Physiology
                Anatomy & Physiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article