33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Teager–Kaiser energy operator signal conditioning improves EMG onset detection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Accurate identification of the onset of muscle activity is an important element in the biomechanical analysis of human movement. The purpose of this study was to determine if inclusion of the Teager–Kaiser energy operator (TKEO) in signal conditioning would increase the accuracy of popular electromyography (EMG) onset detection methods. Three methods, visual determination, threshold-based method, and approximated generalized likelihood ratio were used to estimate the onset of EMG burst with and without TKEO conditioning. Reference signals, with known onset times, were constructed from EMG signals collected during isometric contraction of the vastus lateralis ( n = 17). Additionally, vastus lateralis EMG signals ( n = 255) recorded during gait were used to evaluate a clinical application of the TKEO conditioning. Inclusion of TKEO in signal conditioning significantly reduced mean detection error of all three methods compared with signal conditioning without TKEO, using artificially generated reference data (13 vs. 98 ms, p < 0.001) and also compared with experimental data collected during gait (55 vs. 124 ms, p < 0.001). In conclusion, addition of TKEO as a step in conditioning surface EMG signals increases the detection accuracy of EMG burst boundaries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography.

          P Hodges (1996)
          Little consensus exists in the literature regarding methods for determination of the onset of electromyographic (EMG) activity. The aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracy of a range of computer-based techniques with respect to EMG onset determined visually by an experienced examiner. Twenty-seven methods were compared which varied in terms of EMG processing (low pass filtering at 10, 50 and 500 Hz), threshold value (1, 2 and 3 SD beyond mean of baseline activity) and the number of samples for which the mean must exceed the defined threshold (20, 50 and 100 ms). Three hundred randomly selected trials of a postural task were evaluated using each technique. The visual determination of EMG onset was found to be highly repeatable between days. Linear regression equations were calculated for the values selected by each computer method which indicated that the onset values selected by the majority of the parameter combinations deviated significantly from the visually derived onset values. Several methods accurately selected the time of onset of EMG activity and are recommended for future use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            On amplitude and frequency demodulation using energy operators

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Interaction between age and gait velocity in the amplitude and timing of antagonist muscle coactivation.

              Old adults execute single-joint voluntary movements with heightened antagonist muscle coactivation and altered timing between agonist and antagonist muscles. It is less clear if old adults adopt similar strategies during the most common form of activity of daily living, gait, and if age and gait velocity interact. We compared antagonist muscle activation amplitude and onset, offset, and activation duration of the vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius lateralis from surface EMG in 17 young (age 19-25) and 17 old adults (age 71-85) while walking at 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8m/s. All participants were healthy and highly mobile. The activation level of the four muscles when each acted as the antagonist was, on the average, 83% higher in old vs young adults (for each muscle p<0.05). In two of four muscles this activation increased with gait velocity in young but not in old adults. The inter-burst interval between TA and GL was two-fold (83 ms) longer in young vs old adults and at higher gait velocities it became 14% (24 ms) shorter in young but 51% (31 ms) longer in old adults (interaction, p=0.015). It is concluded that there is an interaction between age and gait velocity in the amplitude and timing of antagonist muscle coactivation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +1-48-713473531 , +1-48-713473431 , stanislaw.solnik@awf.wroc.pl
                Journal
                Eur J Appl Physiol
                European Journal of Applied Physiology
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1439-6319
                1439-6327
                5 June 2010
                5 June 2010
                October 2010
                : 110
                : 3
                : 489-498
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, East Carolina University, 332 Ward Sports Medicine Building, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
                [2 ]Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Physical Therapy, University School of Physical Education, al. I. J. Paderewskiego 35, 51-612 Wrocław, Poland
                [3 ]Department of Family Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd, Greenville, NC 27834 USA
                Author notes

                Communicated by Fausto Baldissera.

                Article
                1521
                10.1007/s00421-010-1521-8
                2945630
                20526612
                861c1ff2-bcf3-428c-bb1c-1a874ca37c20
                © The Author(s) 2010
                History
                : 18 May 2010
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2010

                Anatomy & Physiology
                signal processing,teager–kaiser energy operator,electromyography,muscle onset detection

                Comments

                Comment on this article