2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Acceptance and Commitment therapy (ACT) has attracted a lot of interest during the last 10-15 years with a strong increase of the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The present review and meta-analysis includes 60 RCTs (4234 participants) on psychiatric disorders, somatic disorders, and stress at work. The mean effect size across all comparisons was small (0.42). Compared to the Öst (2008) meta-analysis there was no significant improvement in methodological quality and deterioration in effect size (from 0.68). When ACT was compared to various forms of cognitive or behavioral treatments a small and non-significant effect size of 0.16 was obtained. An evidence-base evaluation showed that ACT is not yet well-established for any disorder. It is probably efficacious for chronic pain and tinnitus, possibly efficacious for depression, psychotic symptoms, OCD, mixed anxiety, drug abuse, and stress at work, and experimental for the remaining disorders.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Behav Res Ther
          Behaviour research and therapy
          1873-622X
          0005-7967
          Oct 2014
          : 61
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: ost@psychology.su.se.
          Article
          S0005-7967(14)00121-1
          10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.018
          25193001
          86930610-4e7b-4dc3-95bd-00cf8cbd7226
          Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
          History

          ACT,Evidence-base,Meta-analysis,Methodological quality,Systematic review

          Comments

          Comment on this article