36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      People living with psychotic illness in 2010: The second Australian national survey of psychosis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The 2010 Survey of High Impact Psychosis (SHIP) is Australia's second national psychosis survey. This paper provides an overview of its findings, including comparisons with the first psychosis survey and general population data. The survey covered 1.5 million people aged 18-64 years, approximately 10% of Australians in this age group. A two-phase design was used. In phase 1, screening for psychosis took place in public mental health services and non-government organizations supporting people with mental illness. In phase 2, 1825 of those screen-positive for psychosis were randomly selected and interviewed. Data collected included symptomatology, substance use, functioning, service utilization, medication use, education, employment, housing, and physical health including fasting blood samples. The estimated 1-month treated prevalence of psychotic disorders in public treatment services was 3.1 people per 1000 population; the 12-month treated prevalence was 4.5 people per 1000. The majority (63.0%) of participants met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. One-half (49.5%) reported attempting suicide in their lifetime and two-thirds (63.2%) were rated as impaired in their ability to socialize. Over half (54.8%) had metabolic syndrome. The proportion currently smoking was 66.1%. Educational achievement was low. Only 21.5% were currently employed. Key changes in the 12 years since the first survey included: a marked drop in psychiatric inpatient admissions; a large increase in the proportion attending community mental health clinics; increased use of rehabilitation services and non-government organizations supporting people with mental illness; a major shift from typical to atypical antipsychotics; and large increases in the proportions with lifetime alcohol or drug abuse/dependence. People with psychotic illness face multiple challenges. An integrated approach to service provision is needed to ensure that their living requirements and needs for social participation are met, in addition to their very considerable mental and physical health needs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.

          Physical inactivity is a global concern, but diverse physical activity measures in use prevent international comparisons. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed as an instrument for cross-national monitoring of physical activity and inactivity. Between 1997 and 1998, an International Consensus Group developed four long and four short forms of the IPAQ instruments (administered by telephone interview or self-administration, with two alternate reference periods, either the "last 7 d" or a "usual week" of recalled physical activity). During 2000, 14 centers from 12 countries collected reliability and/or validity data on at least two of the eight IPAQ instruments. Test-retest repeatability was assessed within the same week. Concurrent (inter-method) validity was assessed at the same administration, and criterion IPAQ validity was assessed against the CSA (now MTI) accelerometer. Spearman's correlation coefficients are reported, based on the total reported physical activity. Overall, the IPAQ questionnaires produced repeatable data (Spearman's rho clustered around 0.8), with comparable data from short and long forms. Criterion validity had a median rho of about 0.30, which was comparable to most other self-report validation studies. The "usual week" and "last 7 d" reference periods performed similarly, and the reliability of telephone administration was similar to the self-administered mode. The IPAQ instruments have acceptable measurement properties, at least as good as other established self-reports. Considering the diverse samples in this study, IPAQ has reasonable measurement properties for monitoring population levels of physical activity among 18- to 65-yr-old adults in diverse settings. The short IPAQ form "last 7 d recall" is recommended for national monitoring and the long form for research requiring more detailed assessment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity.

            A cluster of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus, which occur together more often than by chance alone, have become known as the metabolic syndrome. The risk factors include raised blood pressure, dyslipidemia (raised triglycerides and lowered high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), raised fasting glucose, and central obesity. Various diagnostic criteria have been proposed by different organizations over the past decade. Most recently, these have come from the International Diabetes Federation and the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The main difference concerns the measure for central obesity, with this being an obligatory component in the International Diabetes Federation definition, lower than in the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria, and ethnic specific. The present article represents the outcome of a meeting between several major organizations in an attempt to unify criteria. It was agreed that there should not be an obligatory component, but that waist measurement would continue to be a useful preliminary screening tool. Three abnormal findings out of 5 would qualify a person for the metabolic syndrome. A single set of cut points would be used for all components except waist circumference, for which further work is required. In the interim, national or regional cut points for waist circumference can be used.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
                Aust N Z J Psychiatry
                SAGE Publications
                0004-8674
                1440-1614
                July 30 2012
                August 2012
                June 13 2012
                August 2012
                : 46
                : 8
                : 735-752
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
                [2 ]Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
                [3 ]Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
                [4 ]Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
                [5 ]Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia
                [6 ]School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
                [7 ]Schizophrenia Research Institute, Sydney, Australia
                [8 ]Healthy Communities Research Centre, University of Queensland, Ipswich, Australia
                [9 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
                [10 ]St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
                [11 ]Hunter New England Mental Health, Newcastle, Australia
                [12 ]School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
                [13 ]Psychosocial Research Centre, North West Area Mental Health Services, Coburg, Australia
                [14 ]School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
                [15 ]Ramsay Health Care (SA) Mental Health Services, Adelaide, Australia
                [16 ]Northern Sector, Adelaide Metro Mental Health Directorate, Adelaide, Australia
                [17 ]Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
                [18 ]Health Economics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
                [19 ]SANE Australia, Melbourne, Australia
                [20 ]Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia
                Article
                10.1177/0004867412449877
                22696547
                87df3479-9768-4d08-aa4d-40146851595a
                © 2012

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article