2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Whether article types of a scholarly journal are different in cited metrics using cluster analysis of MeSH terms to display : A bibliometric analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

          Abstract

          Background:

          Many authors are concerned which types of peer-review articles can be cited most in academics and who were the highest-cited authors in a scientific discipline. The prerequisites are determined by: (1) classifying article types; and (2) quantifying co-author contributions. We aimed to apply Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) with social network analysis (SNA) and an authorship-weighted scheme (AWS) to meet the prerequisites above and then demonstrate the applications for scholars.

          Methods:

          By searching the PubMed database (pubmed.com), we used the keyword “Medicine” [journal] and downloaded 5,636 articles published from 2012 to 2016. A total number of 9,758 were cited in Pubmed Central (PMC). Ten MeSH terms were separated to represent the journal types of clusters using SNA to compare the difference in bibliometric indices, that is, h, g, and x as well as author impact factor(AIF). The methods of Kendall coefficient of concordance (W) and one-way ANOVA were performed to verify the internal consistency of indices and the difference across MeSH clusters. Visual representations with dashboards were shown on Google Maps.

          Results:

          We found that Kendall W is 0.97 (χ = 26.22, df = 9, P < .001) congruent with internal consistency on metrics across MeSH clusters. Both article types of methods and therapeutic use show higher frequencies than other 8 counterparts. The author Klaus Lechner (Austria) earns the highest research achievement(the mean of core articles on g = Ag = 15.35, AIF = 21, x = 3.92, h = 1) with one paper (PMID: 22732949, 2012), which was cited 23 times in 2017 and the preceding 5 years.

          Conclusion:

          Publishing article type with study methodology and design might lead to a higher IF. Both classifying article types and quantifying co-author contributions can be accommodated to other scientific disciplines. As such, which type of articles and who contributes most to a specific journal can be evaluated in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis

              Nils Hagen (2008)
              Authorship credit for multi-authored scientific publications is routinely allocated either by issuing full publication credit repeatedly to all coauthors, or by dividing one credit equally among all coauthors. The ensuing inflationary and equalizing biases distort derived bibliometric measures of merit by systematically benefiting secondary authors at the expense of primary authors. Here I show how harmonic counting, which allocates credit according to authorship rank and the number of coauthors, provides simultaneous source-level correction for both biases as well as accommodating further decoding of byline information. I also demonstrate large and erratic effects of counting bias on the original h-index, and show how the harmonic version of the h-index provides unbiased bibliometric ranking of scientific merit while retaining the original's essential simplicity, transparency and intended fairness. Harmonic decoding of byline information resolves the conundrum of authorship credit allocation by providing a simple recipe for source-level correction of inflationary and equalizing bias. Harmonic counting could also offer unrivalled accuracy in automated assessments of scientific productivity, impact and achievement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MEDI
                Medicine
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                October 2019
                25 October 2019
                : 98
                : 43
                : e17631
                Affiliations
                [a ]Medical Research Department
                [b ]Department of Nephrology, Chi-Mei Medical Center
                [c ]Department of Sport Management, College of Leisure and Recreation Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science
                [d ]Department of Biological Science and Technology, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology
                [e ]Department of Leisure, Recreation, and Tourism Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology
                [f ]Department of Occupational Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center
                [g ]Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan.
                Author notes
                []Correspondence: Shih-Bin Su, Chi-Mei Medical Center, 901 Chung Hwa Road, Yung Kung Dist., Tainan 710, Taiwan (e-mail: shihbin1029@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Article
                MD-D-18-07652 17631
                10.1097/MD.0000000000017631
                6824745
                31651878
                882b9faa-ea04-47d3-8826-985288c869e7
                Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 25 October 2018
                : 5 May 2019
                : 23 September 2019
                Categories
                4400
                Research Article
                Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                article type,authorship-weighted scheme,google maps,medical subject headings,pubmed central,social network analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article