21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Brain Reward Learning Response With Harm Avoidance, Weight Gain, and Hypothalamic Effective Connectivity in Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          How does brain response in participants with adolescent anorexia nervosa (AN) compare with healthy controls during taste reward conditioning?

          Findings

          In this cross-sectional multimodal brain imaging study of 56 female adolescents and young adults with AN and 52 matched controls, the AN group showed hyperactivation in the caudate head, nucleus accumbens, and insula compared with controls during a classical conditioning paradigm that has been associated with dopamine function. Orbitofrontal brain response in the AN group was positively associated with harm avoidance and striatal-hypothalamic connectivity but negatively associated with change in body mass index during treatment.

          Meanings

          Altered brain reward response in adolescent AN may indicate altered dopamine function, may have a key role in AN’s specific pathophysiology, and should be explored as a target for biological treatments.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional multimodal brain imaging study examines whether brain reward learning response to taste in adolescent anorexia nervosa is altered and associated with treatment response, striatal-hypothalamic connectivity, and elevated harm avoidance.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Anorexia nervosa (AN) is associated with adolescent onset, severe low body weight, and high mortality as well as high harm avoidance. The brain reward system could have an important role in the perplexing drive for thinness and food avoidance in AN.

          Objective

          To test whether brain reward learning response to taste in adolescent AN is altered and associated with treatment response, striatal-hypothalamic connectivity, and elevated harm avoidance.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          In this cross-sectional multimodal brain imaging study, adolescents and young adults with AN were matched with healthy controls at a university brain imaging facility and eating disorder treatment program. During a sucrose taste classical conditioning paradigm, violations of learned associations between conditioned visual and unconditioned taste stimuli evoked the dopamine-related prediction error (PE). Dynamic effective connectivity during sweet taste receipt was studied to investigate hierarchical brain activation across the brain network that regulates eating. The study was conducted from July 2012 to May 2017, and data were analyzed from June 2017 to December 2017.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Prediction error brain reward response across the insula, caudate, and orbitofrontal cortex; dynamic effective connectivity between hypothalamus and ventral striatum; and treatment weight gain, harm avoidance scores, and salivary cortisol levels and their correlations with PE brain response.

          Results

          Of 56 female participants with AN included in the study, the mean (SD) age was 16.6 (2.5) years, and the mean (SD) body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 15.9 (0.9); of 52 matched female controls, the mean (SD) age was 16.0 (2.8) years, and the mean (SD) BMI was 20.9 (2.1). Prediction error response was elevated in participants with AN in the caudate head, nucleus accumbens, and insula (multivariate analysis of covariance: Wilks λ, 0.707; P = .02; partial η 2 = 0.296), which correlated negatively with sucrose taste pleasantness. Bilateral AN orbitofrontal gyrus rectus PE response was positively correlated with harm avoidance (right ρ, 0.317; 95% CI, 0.091 to 0.539; P < .02; left ρ, 0.336; 95% CI, 0.112 to 0.550; P < .01) but negatively correlated with treatment BMI change (right ρ, −0.282; 95% CI, −0.534 to −0.014; P < .04; left ρ, −0.268; 95% CI, −0.509 to −0.018; P < .045). Participants with AN showed effective connectivity from ventral striatum to hypothalamus, and connectivity strength was positively correlated with insula and orbitofrontal PE response. Right frontal cortex PE response was associated with cortisol, which correlated with body dissatisfaction.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These results further support elevated PE signal in AN and suggest a link between PE and elevated harm avoidance, brain connectivity, and weight gain in AN. Prediction error may have a central role in adolescent AN in driving anxiety and ventral striatal-hypothalamus circuit-controlled food avoidance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

          Recent neurophysiological studies reveal that neurons in certain brain structures carry specific signals about past and future rewards. Dopamine neurons display a short-latency, phasic reward signal indicating the difference between actual and predicted rewards. The signal is useful for enhancing neuronal processing and learning behavioral reactions. It is distinctly different from dopamine's tonic enabling of numerous behavioral processes. Neurons in the striatum, frontal cortex, and amygdala also process reward information but provide more differentiated information for identifying and anticipating rewards and organizing goal-directed behavior. The different reward signals have complementary functions, and the optimal use of rewards in voluntary behavior would benefit from interactions between the signals. Addictive psychostimulant drugs may exert their action by amplifying the dopamine reward signal.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology.

            The human orbitofrontal cortex is an important brain region for the processing of rewards and punishments, which is a prerequisite for the complex and flexible emotional and social behaviour which contributes to the evolutionary success of humans. Yet much remains to be discovered about the functions of this key brain region, and new evidence from functional neuroimaging and clinical neuropsychology is affording new insights into the different functions of the human orbitofrontal cortex. We review the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological literature on the human orbitofrontal cortex, and propose two distinct trends of neural activity based on a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. One is a mediolateral distinction, whereby medial orbitofrontal cortex activity is related to monitoring the reward value of many different reinforcers, whereas lateral orbitofrontal cortex activity is related to the evaluation of punishers which may lead to a change in ongoing behaviour. The second is a posterior-anterior distinction with more complex or abstract reinforcers (such as monetary gain and loss) represented more anteriorly in the orbitofrontal cortex than simpler reinforcers such as taste or pain. Finally, we propose new neuroimaging methods for obtaining further evidence on the localisation of function in the human orbitofrontal cortex.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Randomized clinical trial comparing family-based treatment with adolescent-focused individual therapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa.

              Evidence-based treatment trials for adolescents with anorexia nervosa are few. To evaluate the relative efficacy of family-based treatment (FBT) and adolescent-focused individual therapy (AFT) for adolescents with anorexia nervosa in full remission. Randomized controlled trial. Stanford University and The University of Chicago (April 2005 until March 2009). One hundred twenty-one participants, aged 12 through 18 years, with DSM-IV diagnosis of anorexia nervosa excluding the amenorrhea requirement. Intervention Twenty-four outpatient hours of treatment over 12 months of FBT or AFT. Participants were assessed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months' and 12 months' follow-up posttreatment. Full remission from anorexia nervosa defined as normal weight (≥95% of expected for sex, age, and height) and mean global Eating Disorder Examination score within 1 SD of published means. Secondary outcome measures included partial remission rates (>85% of expected weight for height plus those who were in full remission) and changes in body mass index percentile and eating-related psychopathology. There were no differences in full remission between treatments at EOT. However, at both the 6- and 12-month follow-up, FBT was significantly superior to AFT on this measure. Family-based treatment was significantly superior for partial remission at EOT but not at follow-up. In addition, body mass index percentile at EOT was significantly superior for FBT, but this effect was not found at follow-up. Participants in FBT also had greater changes in Eating Disorder Examination score at EOT than those in AFT, but there were no differences at follow-up. Although both treatments led to considerable improvement and were similarly effective in producing full remission at EOT, FBT was more effective in facilitating full remission at both follow-up points. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00149786.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Psychiatry
                JAMA Psychiatry
                JAMA Psychiatry
                JAMA Psychiatry
                American Medical Association
                2168-622X
                2168-6238
                19 July 2018
                October 2018
                19 July 2018
                : 75
                : 10
                : 1071-1080
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora
                [2 ]Neuroscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
                [3 ]Eating Disorder Care, Denver, Colorado
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: June 25, 2018.
                Published Online: July 19, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2151
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2018 Frank GKW et al. JAMA Psychiatry.
                Corresponding Author: Guido K. W. Frank, MD, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Gary Pavilion B-130, 13123 E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045 ( guido.frank@ 123456ucdenver.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Frank had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr Frank and Jason Tregellas, PhD, are principal investigators.
                Study concept and design: Frank, Shott.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Frank, DeGuzman, Shott, Laudenslager, Rossi.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Frank, DeGuzman, Shott, Laudenslager, Pryor.
                Statistical analysis: Frank, DeGuzman, Shott.
                Obtained funding: Frank.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Frank, Shott, Laudenslager, Rossi, Pryor.
                Study supervision: Frank.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: The study was supported by grants MH096777 and MH103436 from the National Institute of Mental Health (Dr Frank) and grant 1S10OD018435-01 from the National Institutes of Health (principal investigator Jason Tregellas). Ms DeGuzman was supported by grant T32HD041697 to the University of Colorado Neuroscience Program from the National Institutes of Health and by grant TL1 TR001081 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Awards .
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Meeting Presentation: This paper was presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior; July 19, 2018; Bonita Springs, Florida.
                Article
                yoi180056
                10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2151
                6233809
                30027213
                8847ad9e-b301-4b53-8693-28c15286e5d5
                Copyright 2018 Frank GKW et al. JAMA Psychiatry.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 25 March 2018
                : 23 June 2018
                : 25 June 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Awards
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content177

                Cited by37

                Most referenced authors788