23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Surgical reconstruction of the ossicular chain with custom 3D printed ossicular prosthesis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Conductive hearing loss due to ossicular abnormalities occurs from many causes, including trauma, infection, cholesteatoma, surgery and congenital anomalies. Surgical reconstruction of the ossicular chain is a well-established procedure for repair of ossicular defects, but is still plagued by high failure rates. Underlying disease and proper sizing of prostheses are two challenges that lead to component failure. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been used successfully to solve a number of medical prosthesis problems. Custom 3D printing an individualized ossicular prosthesis would be a potential solution for the wide range of anatomic variation encountered in the pathological middle ear, and could decrease the rate of post-operative prosthesis displacement by increasing the likelihood of a proper fit, in addition to decreasing surgical time.

          In this study, the incus was removed from three formalin-fixed cadaveric human temporal bones with no macro- or microscopic evidence of pathology. Imaging of the cadaveric bone was obtained using a standard temporal bone CT protocol. A custom prosthesis for each cadaveric human temporal bone was designed using the Mimics Innovation Suite software (Materialise, Belgium) and fabricated on a Form2 3D printer (FormLabs, Somerville, Massachusetts). Four surgeons then performed insertion of each prosthesis into each middle ear, blinded to the bone from and for which each was designed. The surgeons were asked to match each prosthesis to its correct parent bone.

          Results

          Each prosthesis had unique measurements. Each of the four surgeons was able to correctly match the prosthesis model to its intended temporal bone. The chances of this occurring randomly are 1:1296.

          Conclusions

          A custom 3D printed ossicular prosthesis is a viable solution for conductive hearing loss due to ossicular chain defects. Commercially available CT scanners can detect significant anatomic differences in normal human middle ear ossicles. These differences can be accurately represented with current 3D printing technology and, more significantly, surgeons can detect these differences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review

          Background Three-dimensional (3D) printing has numerous applications and has gained much interest in the medical world. The constantly improving quality of 3D-printing applications has contributed to their increased use on patients. This paper summarizes the literature on surgical 3D-printing applications used on patients, with a focus on reported clinical and economic outcomes. Methods Three major literature databases were screened for case series (more than three cases described in the same study) and trials of surgical applications of 3D printing in humans. Results 227 surgical papers were analyzed and summarized using an evidence table. The papers described the use of 3D printing for surgical guides, anatomical models, and custom implants. 3D printing is used in multiple surgical domains, such as orthopedics, maxillofacial surgery, cranial surgery, and spinal surgery. In general, the advantages of 3D-printed parts are said to include reduced surgical time, improved medical outcome, and decreased radiation exposure. The costs of printing and additional scans generally increase the overall cost of the procedure. Conclusion 3D printing is well integrated in surgical practice and research. Applications vary from anatomical models mainly intended for surgical planning to surgical guides and implants. Our research suggests that there are several advantages to 3D-printed applications, but that further research is needed to determine whether the increased intervention costs can be balanced with the observable advantages of this new technology. There is a need for a formal cost–effectiveness analysis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects

            Background Revision THA is particularly challenging in hips with severe acetabular bone loss. When the extent or geometry of the acetabular bone loss precludes more-straightforward techniques such as jumbo hemispheric cementless shells, reconstruction with morselized allograft protected by a custom cage may offer an alternative, but, to our knowledge, few series have reported on results with this approach. Questions/purposes For patients with severe (Paprosky IIIB) defects, we asked: do individualized custom cages result in (1) improved Harris hip scores; (2) restoration of hip center; and (3) a low incidence of surgical complications? Methods Twenty-six patients (26 hips) with a massive acetabular defect were involved in this study from 2003 to 2013. During this period, one patient was lost to followup and one died, leaving 24 patients (eight males, 16 females) in this retrospective analysis. The customized cages were individualized to each patient’s bone defect based on rapid-prototype three-dimensional printed models. Mean followup was 67 months (range, 24–120 months). Harris hip scores were assessed before surgery and at each followup. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for cage position, migration, and graft incorporation. Complications and reoperations were assessed by chart review. Results The mean Harris hip score improved from 36 (SD, 8; range, 20–49) to 82 (SD, 18; range, 60–96) (p < 0.001). Individualized custom cages resulted in generally reliable restoration of the hip center. No rerevisions have been performed. None of the cups showed radiographic migration, but one cage was believed to be loose, based on a circumferential 2-mm radiolucent line. Cancellous allografts appeared to be incorporated in 23 of 24 patients. One deep infection and one superficial infection were observed and treated with irrigation, débridement, and vacuum-sealing drainage. One dislocation and one suspected injury of the superior gluteal nerve also were observed and treated conservatively. Conclusions Individualized custom cages using rapid prototyping and three-dimensional printing appeared to provide stable fixation and improved hip scores at short-term followup in this small, single-center series. As further improvements in the design and manufacturing process are made, future studies should evaluate larger patient groups for longer times, and, ideally, compare this approach with alternatives for these complex bone defects. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system.

              To determine factors that predict hearing results using a standard prosthesis system. Retrospective chart review. Tertiary referral center. All patients undergoing ossiculoplasty with the Dornhoffer HAPEX partial and total ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP and TORP) from February 1995 to May 1999 who had documented postoperative follow-up and no congenital atresia or stapes fixation. A total of 185 patients (200 ears), 105 men and 80 women, were evaluated. Ossiculoplasty with the Dornhoffer prostheses. Hearing results using a four-frequency pure-tone average air-bone gap (PTA-ABG). Multivariate statistical analysis determined the effect of mucosal status, ossicular chain status, and type of reconstruction techniques on hearing. The PTA-ABGs were 13.4+/-8.1 dB and 14.0+/-8.4 dB for the PORPs (n = 114) and TORPs (n = 86), respectively, which was not statistically different. When the malleus handle was present (n = 126), the PTA-ABG was 11.6+/-6.2 dB, compared with 16.9+/-10.1 dB when it was absent (n = 74), which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Mucosal fibrosis, drainage, revision ear surgery, and type of surgical procedure had a significant detrimental impact on hearing. The type of pathologic process (perforation vs. cholesteatoma) had no significant impact on hearing results. The revised staging system, the Ossiculoplasty Outcome Parameter Staging Index, more adequately predicts hearing outcome in this series of 200 cases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jhirsch@umm.edu
                Journal
                3D Print Med
                3D Print Med
                3d Printing in Medicine
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2365-6271
                27 July 2017
                27 July 2017
                2017
                : 3
                : 1
                : 7
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2175 4264, GRID grid.411024.2, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, , University of Maryland School of Medicine, ; Baltimore, USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2175 4264, GRID grid.411024.2, Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, , University of Maryland School of Medicine, ; Baltimore, USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-7253
                Article
                15
                10.1186/s41205-017-0015-2
                5954796
                29782607
                8867412e-a273-40cc-b338-02a9ee741c57
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 24 May 2017
                : 7 July 2017
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                3d printing,ossicles,ossicular prosthesis,conductive hearing loss

                Comments

                Comment on this article