0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Late gestational nutrient restriction in primiparous beef females: Performance and metabolic status of lactating dams and pre-weaning calves

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fall-calving primiparous beef females [body weight ( BW): 451 ± 28 (SD) kg; body condition score ( BCS): 5.4 ± 0.7] were individually-fed 100% (control; CON; n = 13) or 70% (nutrient restricted; NR; n = 13) of estimated metabolizable energy and metabolizable protein requirements from day 160 of gestation to calving. Post-calving, all dams were individually-fed tall fescue hay supplemented to meet estimated nutrient requirements for maintenance, growth, and lactation in Calan gates until day 149 of lactation, which limited calves to milk only. From day 150 of lactation until weaning at day 243, dams and calves were group-fed in drylots. Dam BW and metabolic status were determined every 21 d, and BCS and backfat ( BF) were determined every 42 d of lactation until weaning. Pre-weaning calf BW, size, and metabolic status were determined every 21 d. Data were analyzed with nutritional plane, calving date, and calf sex (when P < 0.25) as fixed effects. Circulating metabolites included day and nutritional plane × day as repeated measures. We previously reported that post-calving, NR dams were 64 kg and 2.0 BCS less than CON, but calf BW and size at birth were not affected. During the first 147 d of lactation, NR dams gained more ( P < 0.01) BW than CON and increased ( P < 0.01) BCS, while CON decreased ( P ≤ 0.01) BCS and BF. Previously, NR dams had lower ( P < 0.01) circulating triglycerides on day 1 of lactation, tended to have lower ( P = 0.08) triglycerides on day 21, and had lower ( P ≤ 0.04) non-esterified fatty acids ( NEFA) on days 21 and 243 than CON. Maternal glucose and urea N were not affected ( P ≥ 0.73). At weaning, NR dams weighed 17 kg less ( P = 0.15), were 0.67 BCS lower ( P < 0.01), and tended to have less ( P = 0.06) BF. Calves born to NR dams weighed less ( P = 0.02) than CON by day 42 of age and were 13% smaller ( P < 0.01) at weaning. Calf girth measures diverged ( P ≤ 0.05) by day 21 of age, and skeletal size measures were less ( P ≤ 0.08) for calves born to NR dams at most timepoints after day 63 of age. Calves born to NR dams tended to have lower ( P = 0.09) circulating urea N pre-weaning than CON, but glucose, triglycerides, and NEFA were not affected ( P ≥ 0.16). In summary, first-parity beef females that were nutrient restricted during late gestation experienced compensatory growth and gained body condition during lactation but were still thinner at weaning. Nutrient restriction reduced pre-weaning calf growth, likely due to decreased milk production.

          Abstract

          First-parity beef females that were nutrient restricted during late gestation and then fed to meet estimated nutrient requirements during lactation experienced compensatory growth but were still in poorer body condition at weaning than controls. Despite a similar birth weight, calves born to nutrient restricted dams diverged in body weight by day 42 of age and weighed less at weaning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences.

          Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), defined as impaired growth and development of the mammalian embryo/fetus or its organs during pregnancy, is a major concern in domestic animal production. Fetal growth restriction reduces neonatal survival, has a permanent stunting effect on postnatal growth and the efficiency of feed/forage utilization in offspring, negatively affects whole body composition and meat quality, and impairs long-term health and athletic performance. Knowledge of the underlying mechanisms has important implications for the prevention of IUGR and is crucial for enhancing the efficiency of livestock production and animal health. Fetal growth within the uterus is a complex biological event influenced by genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, as well as maternal maturity. These factors impact on the size and functional capacity of the placenta, uteroplacental blood flows, transfer of nutrients and oxygen from mother to fetus, conceptus nutrient availability, the endocrine milieu, and metabolic pathways. Alterations in fetal nutrition and endocrine status may result in developmental adaptations that permanently change the structure, physiology, metabolism, and postnatal growth of the offspring. Impaired placental syntheses of nitric oxide (a major vasodilator and angiogenic factor) and polyamines (key regulators of DNA and protein synthesis) may provide a unified explanation for the etiology of IUGR in response to maternal undernutrition and overnutrition. There is growing evidence that maternal nutritional status can alter the epigenetic state (stable alterations of gene expression through DNA methylation and histone modifications) of the fetal genome. This may provide a molecular mechanism for the role of maternal nutrition on fetal programming and genomic imprinting. Innovative interdisciplinary research in the areas of nutrition, reproductive physiology, and vascular biology will play an important role in designing the next generation of nutrient-balanced gestation diets and developing new tools for livestock management that will enhance the efficiency of animal production and improve animal well being.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis.

            Control of metabolism during pregnancy and lactation involves two types of regulation-homeostasis and homeorhesis. Homeostasis control involves maintenance of physiological equilibrium or constancy of environmental conditions within the animal. Homeorhesis is the orchestrated or coordinated control in metabolism of body tissues necessary to support a physiological state. Regulation of nutrient partitioning during pregnancy involves homeorhetic controls arising from the conceptus. This assures growth of the conceptus (fetus and fetal membranes) and gravid uterus as well as development of the mammary gland. With the onset of lactation many--perhaps even most--maternal tissues undergo further adaptations to support rates of lipogenesis and lipolysis in adipose tissue are examples of important homeorhetic controls of nutrient partitioning that are necessary to supply mammary needs for milk synthesis. The interactions between homeorhesis and homeostasis during pregnancy and lactation and possible endocrine control are discussed. While not definitively established, roles for placental lactogen and prolactin are attractive possibilities in homeorhetic regulation of maternal tissues to support pregnancy and the initiation of lactaion, respectively.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 8th Revised Edition

              (2015)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Anim Sci
                J Anim Sci
                jansci
                Journal of Animal Science
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0021-8812
                1525-3163
                2024
                19 January 2024
                19 January 2024
                : 102
                : skae015
                Affiliations
                Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO 65211, USA
                Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO 65211, USA
                Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO 65211, USA
                Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO 65211, USA
                USDA, ARS, Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center , Clay Center, NE 68933, USA
                Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO 65211, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: meyerall@ 123456missouri.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-2998
                https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9702-5889
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0072-4039
                Article
                skae015
                10.1093/jas/skae015
                10894509
                38243834
                8972e614-5fe9-42b0-83a7-4734e3f4a793
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 October 2023
                : 18 January 2024
                : 25 February 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Categories
                Ruminant Nutrition
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00960

                beef calves,beef heifers,developmental programming,lactation,metabolites,pre-weaning growth

                Comments

                Comment on this article