3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Careless and insufficient effort responding (C/IER) can pose a major threat to data quality and, as such, to validity of inferences drawn from questionnaire data. A rich body of methods aiming at its detection has been developed. Most of these methods can detect only specific types of C/IER patterns. However, typically different types of C/IER patterns occur within one data set and need to be accounted for. We present a model-based approach for detecting manifold manifestations of C/IER at once. This is achieved by leveraging response time (RT) information available from computer-administered questionnaires and integrating theoretical considerations on C/IER with recent psychometric modeling approaches. The approach a) takes the specifics of attentive response behavior on questionnaires into account by incorporating the distance–difficulty hypothesis, b) allows for attentiveness to vary on the screen-by-respondent level, c) allows for respondents with different trait and speed levels to differ in their attentiveness, and d) at once deals with various response patterns arising from C/IER. The approach makes use of item-level RTs. An adapted version for aggregated RTs is presented that supports screening for C/IER behavior on the respondent level. Parameter recovery is investigated in a simulation study. The approach is illustrated in an empirical example, comparing different RT measures and contrasting the proposed model-based procedure against indicator-based multiple-hurdle approaches.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Identifying careless responses in survey data.

            When data are collected via anonymous Internet surveys, particularly under conditions of obligatory participation (such as with student samples), data quality can be a concern. However, little guidance exists in the published literature regarding techniques for detecting careless responses. Previously several potential approaches have been suggested for identifying careless respondents via indices computed from the data, yet almost no prior work has examined the relationships among these indicators or the types of data patterns identified by each. In 2 studies, we examined several methods for identifying careless responses, including (a) special items designed to detect careless response, (b) response consistency indices formed from responses to typical survey items, (c) multivariate outlier analysis, (d) response time, and (e) self-reported diligence. Results indicated that there are two distinct patterns of careless response (random and nonrandom) and that different indices are needed to identify these different response patterns. We also found that approximately 10%-12% of undergraduates completing a lengthy survey for course credit were identified as careless responders. In Study 2, we simulated data with known random response patterns to determine the efficacy of several indicators of careless response. We found that the nature of the data strongly influenced the efficacy of the indices to identify careless responses. Recommendations include using identified rather than anonymous responses, incorporating instructed response items before data collection, as well as computing consistency indices and multivariate outlier analysis to ensure high-quality data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants.

              Participant attentiveness is a concern for many researchers using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Although studies comparing the attentiveness of participants on MTurk versus traditional subject pool samples have provided mixed support for this concern, attention check questions and other methods of ensuring participant attention have become prolific in MTurk studies. Because MTurk is a population that learns, we hypothesized that MTurkers would be more attentive to instructions than are traditional subject pool samples. In three online studies, participants from MTurk and collegiate populations participated in a task that included a measure of attentiveness to instructions (an instructional manipulation check: IMC). In all studies, MTurkers were more attentive to the instructions than were college students, even on novel IMCs (Studies 2 and 3), and MTurkers showed larger effects in response to a minute text manipulation. These results have implications for the sustainable use of MTurk samples for social science research and for the conclusions drawn from research with MTurk and college subject pool samples.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ulitzsch@leibniz-ipn.de
                Journal
                Psychometrika
                Psychometrika
                Psychometrika
                Springer US (New York )
                0033-3123
                1860-0980
                2 December 2021
                2 December 2021
                2022
                : 87
                : 2
                : 593-619
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.461789.5, IPN–Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, ; Olshausenstraße 62, 24118 Kiel, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.14095.39, ISNI 0000 0000 9116 4836, Freie Universität Berlin, ; Berlin, Germany
                [3 ]GRID grid.208226.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 7053, Boston College, ; Chestnut Hill, USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.461683.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2109 1122, DIPF–Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, ; Frankfurt, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9267-8542
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-8171
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4674-8837
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-169X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1298-9701
                Article
                9817
                10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7
                9166878
                34855118
                897855cf-9df2-4342-92ec-d4d6b50f6ec9
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 25 August 2020
                : 11 October 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: IPN – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik an der Universität Kiel (3469)
                Categories
                Application Reviews and Case Studies
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Psychometric Society 2022

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                careless responses,data screening,response times,item response theory,mixture modeling

                Comments

                Comment on this article