13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determining and Managing Fetal Radiation Dose from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures in Turkey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          We intended to calculate approximate fetal doses in pregnant women who underwent diagnostic radiology procedures and to evaluate the safety of their pregnancies.

          Materials and Methods

          We contacted hospitals in different cities in Turkey where requests for fetal dose calculation are usually sent. Fetal radiation exposure was calculated for 304 cases in 218 pregnant women with gestational ages ranging from 5 days to 19 weeks, 2 days. FetDose software (ver. 4.0) was used in fetal dose calculations for radiographic and computed tomography (CT) procedures. The body was divided into three zones according to distance from the fetus. The first zone consisted of the head area, the lower extremities below the knee, and the upper extremities; the second consisted of the cervicothoracic region and upper thighs; and the third consisted of the abdominopelvic area. Fetal doses from radiologic procedures between zones were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and a Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U-test.

          Results

          The average fetal doses from radiography and CT in the first zone were 0.05 ± 0.01 mGy and 0.81 ± 0.04 mGy, respectively; 0.21 ± 0.05 mGy and 1.77 ± 0.22 mGy, respectively, in the second zone; and 6.42 ± 0.82 mGy and 22.94 ± 1.28 mGy, respectively, in the third zone ( p < 0.001). Our results showed that fetal radiation exposures in our group of pregnant women did not reach the level (50 mGy) that is known to increase risk for congenital anomalies.

          Conclusion

          Fetal radiation exposure in the diagnostic radiology procedures in our study did not reach risk levels that might have indicated abortion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned?

          The potential biological effects of in utero radiation exposure of a developing fetus include prenatal death, intrauterine growth restriction, small head size, mental retardation, organ malformation, and childhood cancer. The risk of each effect depends on the gestational age at the time of exposure, fetal cellular repair mechanisms, and the absorbed radiation dose level. A comparison between the dose levels associated with each of these risks and the estimated fetal doses from typical radiologic examinations lends support to the conclusion that fetal risks are minimal and, therefore, that radiologic and nuclear medicine examinations that may provide significant diagnostic information should not be withheld from pregnant women. The latter position is advocated by the International Commission on Radiological Protection, National Council on Radiation Protection, American College of Radiology, and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. However, although the risks are small, it is important to ensure that radiation doses are kept as low as reasonably achievable. RSNA, 2007
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation.

            The association between the low dose of ionizing radiation received by the fetus in utero from diagnostic radiography, particularly in the last trimester of pregnancy, and the subsequent risk of cancer in childhood provides direct evidence against the existence of a threshold dose below which no excess risk arises, and has led to changes in medical practice. Initially reported in 1956, a consistent association has been found in many case-control studies in different countries. The excess relative risk obtained from combining the results of these studies has high statistical significance and suggests that, in the past, a radiographic examination of the abdomen of a pregnant woman produced a proportional increase in risk of about 40%. A corresponding causal relationship is not universally accepted and this interpretation has been challenged on four grounds. On review, the evidence against bias and confounding as alternative explanations for the association is strong. Scrutiny of the objections to causality suggests that they are not, or may not be, valid. A causal explanation is supported by evidence indicating an appropriate dose-response relationship and by animal experiments. It is concluded that radiation doses of the order of 10 mGy received by the fetus in utero produce a consequent increase in the risk of childhood cancer. The excess absolute risk coefficient at this level of exposure is approximately 6% per gray, although the exact value of this risk coefficient remains uncertain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

              (1991)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Radiol
                Korean J Radiol
                KJR
                Korean Journal of Radiology
                The Korean Society of Radiology
                1229-6929
                2005-8330
                Nov-Dec 2015
                26 October 2015
                : 16
                : 6
                : 1276-1282
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Imaging Techniques, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34090, Turkey.
                [2 ]Department of Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34090, Turkey.
                [3 ]Department of Medical Genetic, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34090, Turkey.
                [4 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34090, Turkey.
                [5 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34090, Turkey.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Mustafa Ozbayrak, MD, Department of Medical Imaging Techniques, Istanbul University, 34300-Kocamustafapasa, Istanbul 34090, Turkey. Tel: (90212) 414-3000, Fax: (90212) 414-3167, drmozbayrak@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1276
                4644749
                26576117
                89845bbc-5eba-4153-a892-6e600bf72503
                Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Radiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 April 2015
                : 02 August 2015
                Funding
                Funded by: Istanbul University
                Award ID: 32804
                Categories
                Genitourinary Imaging
                Original Article

                Radiology & Imaging
                fetus,radiation effects,computed tomography,radiography
                Radiology & Imaging
                fetus, radiation effects, computed tomography, radiography

                Comments

                Comment on this article