2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emerging Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Disease Activity and Progression in Multiple Sclerosis

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 5 , , PhD 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , MD 9 , , PhD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , , MD 10 , , MD, PhD 14 , , PhD 6 , , MD, PhD 15 , , MD 13 , , MD, PhD 6 , , MD 16 , , MD 17 , , MD 18 , 19 , , MD 6 , , MD, PhD 20 , , MD 21 , , MD 21 , , PhD 6 , , PhD 6 , , PhD 6 , , MD 6 , , PhD 6 , , PhD 6 , , MD 3 ,
      JAMA Neurology
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines data from 2 prospective multiple sclerosis cohorts to identify cerebrospinal fluid measures associated with relapsing and nonrelapsing progressive multiple sclerosis pathobiology.

          Key Points

          Question

          What cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measures are associated with relapsing vs nonrelapsing progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) disease biology?

          Findings

          This cohort study found that elevated glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and neurofilament heavy chain were associated with nonrelapsing progression and lymphocyte measures were associated with relapsing biology in patients with both relapsing and primary progressive clinical phenotypes. Elevated neurofilament light chain reflected both processes.

          Meaning

          Activated glial measures, and GFAP in particular, may be CSF biomarkers of nonrelapsing progressive MS biology and demonstrate the commonalities of relapsing and nonrelapsing progressive disease mechanisms across the MS clinical spectrum.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Biomarkers distinguishing nonrelapsing progressive disease biology from relapsing biology in multiple sclerosis (MS) are lacking. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an accessible fluid that most closely reflects central nervous system biology.

          Objective

          To identify CSF biological measures associated with progressive MS pathobiology.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cohort study assessed data from 2 prospective MS cohorts: a test cohort provided serial CSF, clinical, and imaging assessments in a multicenter study of patients with relapsing MS (RMS) or primary progressive MS (PPMS) who were initiating anti-CD20 treatment (recruitment: 2016-2018; analysis: 2020-2023). A single-site confirmation cohort was used to assess CSF at baseline and long-term (>10 year) clinical follow-up (analysis: 2022-2023).

          Exposures

          Test-cohort participants initiated standard-of-care ocrelizumab treatment. Confirmation-cohort participants were untreated or received standard-of-care disease-modifying MS therapies.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Twenty-five CSF markers, including neurofilament light chain, neurofilament heavy chain, and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP); 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP24); and brain magnetic resonance imaging measures reflecting focal injury, tissue loss, and progressive biology (slowly expanding lesions [SELs]).

          Results

          The test cohort (n = 131) included 100 patients with RMS (mean [SD] age, 36.6 [10.4] years; 68 [68%] female and 32 [32%] male; Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score, 0-5.5), and 31 patients with PPMS (mean [SD] age, 44.9 [7.4] years; 15 [48%] female and 16 [52%] male; EDSS score, 3.0-6.5). The confirmation cohort (n = 68) included 41 patients with RMS and 27 with PPMS enrolled at diagnosis (age, 40 years [range, 20-61 years]; 47 [69%] female and 21 [31%] male). In the test cohort, GFAP was correlated with SEL count ( r = 0.33), greater proportion of T2 lesion volume from SELs ( r = 0.24), and lower T1-weighted intensity within SELs ( r = –0.33) but not with acute inflammatory measures. Neurofilament heavy chain was correlated with SEL count ( r = 0.25) and lower T1-weighted intensity within SELs ( r = –0.28). Immune markers correlated with measures of acute inflammation and, unlike GFAP, were impacted by anti-CD20. In the confirmation cohort, higher baseline CSF GFAP levels were associated with long-term CDP24 (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4; P = .002).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this study, activated glial markers (in particular GFAP) and neurofilament heavy chain were associated specifically with nonrelapsing progressive disease outcomes (independent of acute inflammatory activity). Elevated CSF GFAP was associated with long-term MS disease progression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria

          New evidence and consensus has led to further revision of the McDonald Criteria for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The use of imaging for demonstration of dissemination of central nervous system lesions in space and time has been simplified, and in some circumstances dissemination in space and time can be established by a single scan. These revisions simplify the Criteria, preserve their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, address their applicability across populations, and may allow earlier diagnosis and more uniform and widespread use. Ann Neurol 2011
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The relation between inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis brains

            Some recent studies suggest that in progressive multiple sclerosis, neurodegeneration may occur independently from inflammation. The aim of our study was to analyse the interdependence of inflammation, neurodegeneration and disease progression in various multiple sclerosis stages in relation to lesional activity and clinical course, with a particular focus on progressive multiple sclerosis. The study is based on detailed quantification of different inflammatory cells in relation to axonal injury in 67 multiple sclerosis autopsies from different disease stages and 28 controls without neurological disease or brain lesions. We found that pronounced inflammation in the brain is not only present in acute and relapsing multiple sclerosis but also in the secondary and primary progressive disease. T- and B-cell infiltrates correlated with the activity of demyelinating lesions, while plasma cell infiltrates were most pronounced in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) and even persisted, when T- and B-cell infiltrates declined to levels seen in age matched controls. A highly significant association between inflammation and axonal injury was seen in the global multiple sclerosis population as well as in progressive multiple sclerosis alone. In older patients (median 76 years) with long-disease duration (median 372 months), inflammatory infiltrates declined to levels similar to those found in age-matched controls and the extent of axonal injury, too, was comparable with that in age-matched controls. Ongoing neurodegeneration in these patients, which exceeded the extent found in normal controls, could be attributed to confounding pathologies such as Alzheimer's or vascular disease. Our study suggests a close association between inflammation and neurodegeneration in all lesions and disease stages of multiple sclerosis. It further indicates that the disease processes of multiple sclerosis may die out in aged patients with long-standing disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

              B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Neurol
                JAMA Neurol
                JAMA Neurology
                American Medical Association
                2168-6149
                2168-6157
                11 March 2024
                April 2024
                11 March 2024
                : 81
                : 4
                : 373-383
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
                [2 ]University of California, San Francisco
                [3 ]Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [4 ]University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
                [5 ]F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland
                [6 ]Genentech, South San Francisco, California
                [7 ]University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [8 ]MS Center of Northeastern New York, Latham
                [9 ]The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
                [10 ]University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
                [11 ]McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [12 ]The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
                [13 ]Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
                [14 ]Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
                [15 ]Stanford University, Stanford, California
                [16 ]Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City
                [17 ]Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
                [18 ]Institute of Neuropathology, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
                [19 ]Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Göttingen, Germany
                [20 ]Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Carl Gustav Carus University Clinic, Dresden, Germany
                [21 ]Department of Medicine in Neurology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: December 8, 2023.
                Published Online: March 11, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0017
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2024 Cross AH et al. JAMA Neurology.
                Corresponding Author: Amit Bar-Or, MD, Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 3 Gates Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104 ( amitbar@ 123456pennmedicine.upenn.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Bar-Or had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Cross, Gelfand, Bennett, von Büdingen, Hafler, Musch, Weber, Freedman, Anania, Winger, Herman, Harp, Bar-Or.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Cross, Gelfand, Thebault, Cameron, Carruthers, Edwards, Fallis, Gerstein, Giacomini, Greenberg, Hafler, Ionete, Kaunzner, Kodama, Lock, Longbrake, Pardo, Piehl, Yuen, Ziemssen, Bose, Freedman, Anania, Ramesh, Winger, Jia, Herman, Harp, Bar-Or.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Cross, Thebault, Cameron, Anania, Winger, Jia, Herman, Harp, Bar-Or.
                Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Gelfand, Bennett, von Büdingen, Carruthers, Edwards, Fallis, Gerstein, Giacomini, Greenberg, Hafler, Ionete, Kaunzner, Kodama, Lock, Longbrake, Musch, Pardo, Piehl, Weber, Yuen, Ziemssen, Bose, Freedman, Anania, Ramesh, Winger, Jia, Herman, Harp, Bar-Or.
                Statistical analysis: Thebault, Cameron, Kodama, Musch, Anania, Ramesh, Jia.
                Obtained funding: Hafler, Winger, Herman, Bar-Or.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Bennett, Carruthers, Gerstein, Ionete, Kaunzner, Lock, Piehl, Yuen, Ziemssen, Freedman, Anania, Jia, Herman, Bar-Or.
                Supervision: Hafler, Lock, Pardo, Weber, Yuen, Ziemssen, Freedman, Anania, Winger, Jia, Herman, Harp, Bar-Or.
                Other: provided confirmatory cohort data and analyses: Thebault.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Cross reported grants from Genentech for financial support of the multicenter study and nonfinancial support from Genentech (help with statistical analysis) during the conduct of the study; consulting, speaking, and/or advisory board fees from Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Horizon, Novartis, Genentech, EMD Serono (Merck), TG Therapeutics, and Octave outside the submitted work; and having a patent for 15060-630 (015875; “Methods for simultaneous multi-angular relaxometry of tissue using magnetic resonance imaging”). Dr Gelfand reported grants from Hoffmann-LaRoche for research support to his institution for clinical trials during the conduct of the study; grants from Vigil Neurosciences for research support for clinical trials and personal fees from Arialys Consulting outside the submitted work; and service on trial steering committees for Hoffmann-LaRoche. Dr Bennett reported consulting, data monitoring board, and/or speaking fees from Roche-Genentech, Alexion-AstraZeneca, Amgen, Imcyse, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Beigene, Clene Nanomedicine, Antigenomycs, Reistone Bio, and TG Therapeutics outside the submitted work. Dr von Büdingen reported being a shareholder of Roche. Dr Cameron reported holding stock from Genentech/Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Carruthers reported grants from Genentech and Roche Canada and personal fees from Serono, Roche Canada, Biogen, Novartis, and Teva Canada during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Alexion outside the submitted work. Dr Giacomini reported grants, personal fees, and travel/educational grants from Roche during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, EMD Serono, Genzyme-Sanofi, Novartis, Teva Innovation Canada, and Innodem Neurosciences and grants from the MS Society of Canada outside the submitted work; and being the chief medical officer of and having stock options in Innodem Neurosciences. Dr Greenberg reported grants from Genentech during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Alexion, Novartis, EMD Serono, Horizon, Genentech, Sandoz, Sanofi, Signant, TG Therapeutics, Cycle, Arialys, Clene, Syneos, PRIME, and GenrAb; grants from Anokion and Regeneron; and nonfinancial support from the Siegel Rare Neuroimmune Association outside the submitted work. Dr Hafler reported grants from Genentech and Roche during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Genentech, Sanofi, and GSK outside the submitted work. Dr Ionete reported grants from Genentech during the conduct of the study; and being a scientific advisor for Sanofi outside the submitted work. Dr Kaunzner reported clinical study support from Genentech during the conduct of the study and grants from Genentech and serving on advisory boards for Novartis and EMD Serono outside the submitted work. Dr Lock reported personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Horizon Therapeutics, Diagnose Early, and InterX outside the submitted work. Dr Longbrake reported clinical trial support from Genentech during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Genentech, grants from Genentech and Biogen, and personal fees from Biogen, Janssen, TG Therapeutics, NGM Bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, and Genzyme outside the submitted work. Dr Musch reported being a shareholder of Hoffmann-La Roche. Dr Pardo reported grants from Roche Genentech during the conduct of the study; grants from Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, TG Therapeutics, and Roche Genentech; personal fees from Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, TG Therapeutics, Roche Genentech, and Janssen outside the submitted work; and having Progentec Diagnostics stock options. Dr Piehl reported clinical trial fees from Genentech during the conduct of the study; research support and/or grants from Merck, Janssen, UCB, and Swedish MRC; expert testimony fees from Novartis; and data monitoring committee fees from Roche and Lundbeck outside the submitted work. Dr Yuen reported being a shareholder of Hoffmann-La Roche. Dr Ziemssen reported grants and personal fees from Roche during the conduct of the study and grants, personal fees, and/or nonfinancial support from Sanofi, Teva, Novartis, Roche, Biogen, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Almirall, and Merck outside the submitted work. Dr Bose reported grants from the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada, a TOHAMO innovation fund grant from IFPOC, and a Collaborate 2 Commercialize award from the Ontario Centre for Innovation and personal fees from Teva Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme outside the submitted work. Dr Freedman reported personal fees from Roche during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, Alexion/AstraZeneca, Biogen Idec, Atara Biotherapeutics, EMD Serono/Merck Serono, Find Therapeutics, BMS/Celgene, Novartis, Setpoint Medical, Sandoz, and Teva Canada Innovation outside the submitted work. Dr Winger reported being a shareholder of Hoffmann-La Roche. Dr Herman reported being a shareholder in Hoffmann-La Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Harp reported being a stockholder of Genentech during the conduct of the study. Dr Bar-Or reported personal fees from Abata, Novartis, and Roche/Genentech and grants from Biogen, Novartis, and Roche/Genentech outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: The test-cohort dataset was generated from a study funded by Genentech. The confirmatory dataset was supported by the University of Ottawa multiple sclerosis program.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Genentech contributed to the design and conduct of the study and interpretation of the data for the test cohort; otherwise, the supporting organizations had no role in the collection, management, and analysis of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
                Additional Contributions: We thank Christine Gould, PhD, CMPP, of Nucleus Global, for providing formatting assistance, which was funded by Genentech in accordance with Good Publication Practice guidelines. We also thank Shweta Kotwal, MS, MBBS; Aaron Schroeder, BS; Katie Dalpozzo, BS; Jenny Jiang, MA; Yun-An Shen, MS; Damian Fiore, PharmD; David Spiciarich, PhD; Ellen Casavant, PhD; and Manuel Magana, BA, for their operational and technical support; Shristi Pandey, PhD (all Genentech, South San Francisco, at the time of their contributions), for their bioinformatics support; and the patients who contributed samples and clinical data.
                Additional Information: Coauthor Keith Edwards, MD, died October 22, 2022.
                Article
                noi240002
                10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0017
                10928543
                38466277
                8a6128da-bf63-44cf-85a2-b970c17af997
                Copyright 2024 Cross AH et al. JAMA Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 6 December 2023
                : 8 December 2023
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article