12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      EDD, a Ubiquitin-protein Ligase of the N-end Rule Pathway, Associates with Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Components and Regulates the Mitotic Response to Nocodazole*

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Mitotic progression is regulated by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) to prevent aneuploidy and chromosome damage.

          Results: EDD binds to various SAC components, governs the expression levels of key mitosis-associated proteins, and mediates the response to the mitotic spindle poison nocodazole.

          Conclusion: EDD contributes to the ability of the SAC to mediate checkpoint arrest.

          Significance: EDD may act to maintain genomic integrity.

          Abstract

          In this work, we identify physical and genetic interactions that implicate E3 identified by differential display (EDD) in promoting spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) function. During mitosis, the SAC initiates a mitotic checkpoint in response to chromosomes with kinetochores unattached to spindle pole microtubules. Similar to Budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles-related 1 (BUBR1) siRNA, a bona fide SAC component, EDD siRNA abrogated G 2/M accumulation in response to the mitotic destabilizing agent nocodazole. Furthermore, EDD siRNA reduced mitotic cell viability and, in nocodazole-treated cells, increased expression of the promitotic progression protein cell division cycle 20 (CDC20). Copurification studies also identified physical interactions with CDC20, BUBR1, and other components of the SAC. Taken together, these observations highlight the potential role of EDD in regulating mitotic progression and the cellular response to perturbed mitosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores

          The Aurora/Ipl1 family of protein kinases plays multiple roles in mitosis and cytokinesis. Here, we describe ZM447439, a novel selective Aurora kinase inhibitor. Cells treated with ZM447439 progress through interphase, enter mitosis normally, and assemble bipolar spindles. However, chromosome alignment, segregation, and cytokinesis all fail. Despite the presence of maloriented chromosomes, ZM447439-treated cells exit mitosis with normal kinetics, indicating that the spindle checkpoint is compromised. Indeed, ZM447439 prevents mitotic arrest after exposure to paclitaxel. RNA interference experiments suggest that these phenotypes are due to inhibition of Aurora B, not Aurora A or some other kinase. In the absence of Aurora B function, kinetochore localization of the spindle checkpoint components BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E is diminished. Furthermore, inhibition of Aurora B kinase activity prevents the rebinding of BubR1 to metaphase kinetochores after a reduction in centromeric tension. Aurora B kinase activity is also required for phosphorylation of BubR1 on entry into mitosis. Finally, we show that BubR1 is not only required for spindle checkpoint function, but is also required for chromosome alignment. Together, these results suggest that by targeting checkpoint proteins to kinetochores, Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase onset.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chromosome segregation errors as a cause of DNA damage and structural chromosome aberrations.

            Various types of chromosomal aberrations, including numerical (aneuploidy) and structural (e.g., translocations, deletions), are commonly found in human tumors and are linked to tumorigenesis. Aneuploidy is a direct consequence of chromosome segregation errors in mitosis, whereas structural aberrations are caused by improperly repaired DNA breaks. Here, we demonstrate that chromosome segregation errors can also result in structural chromosome aberrations. Chromosomes that missegregate are frequently damaged during cytokinesis, triggering a DNA double-strand break response in the respective daughter cells involving ATM, Chk2, and p53. We show that these double-strand breaks can lead to unbalanced translocations in the daughter cells. Our data show that segregation errors can cause translocations and provide insights into the role of whole-chromosome instability in tumorigenesis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression.

              Accurate chromosome segregation relies on the precise regulation of mitotic progression. Regulation involves control over the timing of mitosis and a spindle assembly checkpoint that links anaphase onset to the completion of chromosome-microtubule attachment. In this paper, we combine live-cell imaging of HeLa cells and protein depletion by RNA interference to examine the functions of the Mad, Bub, and kinetochore proteins in mitotic timing and checkpoint control. We show that the depletion of any one of these proteins abolishes the mitotic arrest provoked by depolymerizing microtubules or blocking chromosome-microtubule attachment with RNAi. However, the normal progress of mitosis is accelerated only when Mad2 or BubR1, but not other Mad and Bub proteins, are inactivated. Moreover, whereas checkpoint control requires kinetochores, the regulation of mitotic timing by Mad2 and BubR1 is kinetochore-independent in fashion. We propose that cytosolic Mad2-BubR1 is essential to restrain anaphase onset early in mitosis when kinetochores are still assembling.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Biol Chem
                J. Biol. Chem
                jbc
                jbc
                JBC
                The Journal of Biological Chemistry
                American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (11200 Rockville Pike, Suite 302, Rockville, MD 20852-3110, U.S.A. )
                0021-9258
                1083-351X
                15 May 2015
                1 April 2015
                1 April 2015
                : 290
                : 20
                : 12585-12594
                Affiliations
                [1]From the MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, Scotland, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [1 ] To whom correspondence should be addressed: MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh CRUK Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd. S., Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK. Tel.: 44-131-7773555; E-mail: mark.ditzel@ 123456ed.ac.uk .
                Article
                M114.625673
                10.1074/jbc.M114.625673
                4432279
                25833949
                8ab3e3e1-a213-456e-a6bf-9981efe9ecbf
                © 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

                Author's Choice—Final version free via Creative Commons CC-BY license.

                History
                : 18 November 2014
                : 1 April 2015
                Categories
                Cell Biology

                Biochemistry
                cell cycle,checkpoint control,chromosomes,e3 ubiquitin ligase,mitosis,bub3,bubr1,cdc20,edd,sac
                Biochemistry
                cell cycle, checkpoint control, chromosomes, e3 ubiquitin ligase, mitosis, bub3, bubr1, cdc20, edd, sac

                Comments

                Comment on this article