5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Corticosterone basal levels and vulnerability to LPS-induced neuroinflammation in the rat brain

      , , , ,
      Brain Research
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To assess whether the individual differences on the brain response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are correlated with the individual differences in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis basal activity, adult male outbred rats were injected i.p. with 1 mg/kg LPS and evaluated after 4 h. Basal (1 week before LPS) and post-LPS plasma corticosterone (CC) were measured (mean basal: 225+/-22 ng/mL at 15:00 h). Group H was assigned to animals with 33% higher levels of CC (>234 ng/mL) and group L to animals with 33% lower levels of CC (<167 ng/mL). The H group showed an 8.8 times less relative increase of CC after LPS than the L group as well as a reduced glucocorticoid receptor upregulation after LPS. In addition, H individuals present higher plasma levels of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta after LPS. Interestingly, these animals are more vulnerable to the accumulation of oxidative/nitrosative mediators in the brain (NF-kappaB, NOS-2 and COX-2). Concomitantly, H animals are less protected against LPS-induced neuroinflammation, since anti-inflammatory mediators, lipocalin-prostaglandinD2 synthase and peroxisome proliferator-activated gamma, are downregulated after LPS. These data demonstrate that CC plasma basal levels might be a relevant parameter for predicting the individual response to LPS.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Brain Research
          Brain Research
          Elsevier BV
          00068993
          February 2010
          February 2010
          : 1315
          : 159-168
          Article
          10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.014
          20026014
          8b08e31d-ef3e-4153-9faf-8d6ebadb980b
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article