4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of neuroprotective and immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells in an ex vivo retinal explant model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Glaucoma is a blinding degenerative neuropathy in which the death of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) causes progressive loss of visual field and eventually vision. Neuroinflammation appears to be a key event in the progression and spread of this disease. Thus, microglial immunomodulation represents a promising therapeutic approach in which mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) might play a crucial role. Their neuroprotective and regenerative potentials have already raised hope in animal models. Yet no definitive treatment has been developed, and some safety concerns have been reported in human trials. In the present study, we investigated the neuroprotective and immunomodulatory properties as well as the safety of MSCs in an ex vivo neuroretina explant model.

          Methods

          Labeled rat bone marrow MSCs were placed in coculture with rat retinal explants after optic nerve axotomy. We analyzed the neuroprotective effect of MSCs on RGC survival by immunofluorescence using RBPMS, Brn3a, and NeuN markers. Gliosis and retinal microglial activation were measured by using GFAP, CD68, and ITGAM mRNA quantification and GFAP, CD68, and Iba1 immunofluorescence stainings. We also analyzed the mRNA expression of both ‘M1’ or classically activated state inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL1β, and IL6), and ‘M2’ or alternatively activated state microglial markers (Arginase 1, IL10, CD163, and TNFAIP6).

          Results

          The number of RGCs was significantly higher in retinal explants cultured with MSCs compared to the control group at Day 7 following the optic nerve axotomy. Retinal explants cultured with MSCs showed a decrease in mRNA markers of gliosis and microglial activations, and immunostainings revealed that GFAP, Iba1, and CD68 were limited to the inner layers of the retina compared to controls in which microglial activation was observed throughout the retina. In addition, MSCs inhibited the M1 phenotype of the microglia. However, edema of the explants was observed in presence of MSCs, with an increase in fibronectin labeling at the surface of the explant corresponding to an epiretinal membrane-like phenotype.

          Conclusion

          Using an ex vivo neuroretina model, we demonstrated a neuroprotective and immunomodulatory effect of MSCs on RGCs. Unfortunately, the presence of MSCs also led to explant edema and epiretinal membrane formation, as described in human trials. Using the MSC secretome might offer the beneficial effects of MSCs without their potential adverse effects, through paracrine signaling.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-022-02418-w.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization.

          Plasticity and functional polarization are hallmarks of the mononuclear phagocyte system. Here we review emerging key properties of different forms of macrophage activation and polarization (M1, M2a, M2b, M2c), which represent extremes of a continuum. In particular, recent evidence suggests that differential modulation of the chemokine system integrates polarized macrophages in pathways of resistance to, or promotion of, microbial pathogens and tumors, or immunoregulation, tissue repair and remodeling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Differential Roles of M1 and M2 Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

            One of the most striking hallmarks shared by various neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, is microglia-mediated neuroinflammation. Increasing evidence indicates that microglial activation in the central nervous system is heterogeneous, which can be categorized into two opposite types: M1 phenotype and M2 phenotype. Depending on the phenotypes activated, microglia can produce either cytotoxic or neuroprotective effects. In this review, we focus on the potential role of M1 and M2 microglia and the dynamic changes of M1/M2 phenotypes that are critically associated with the neurodegenerative diseases. Generally, M1 microglia predominate at the injury site at the end stage of disease, when the immunoresolution and repair process of M2 microglia are dampened. This phenotype transformation is very complicated in AD due to the phagocytosis of regionally distributed β-amyloid (Aβ) plaque and tangles that are released into the extracellular space. The endogenous stimuli including aggregated α-synuclein, mutated superoxide dismutase, Aβ, and tau oligomers exist in the milieu that may persistently activate M1 pro-inflammatory responses and finally lead to irreversible neuron loss. The changes of microglial phenotypes depend on the disease stages and severity; mastering the stage-specific switching of M1/M2 phenotypes within appropriate time windows may provide better therapeutic benefit.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Neuroinflammation and M2 microglia: the good, the bad, and the inflamed

              The concept of multiple macrophage activation states is not new. However, extending this idea to resident tissue macrophages, like microglia, has gained increased interest in recent years. Unfortunately, the research on peripheral macrophage polarization does not necessarily translate accurately to their central nervous system (CNS) counterparts. Even though pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines can polarize microglia to distinct activation states, the specific functions of these states is still an area of intense debate. This review examines the multiple possible activation states microglia can be polarized to. This is followed by a detailed description of microglial polarization and the functional relevance of this process in both acute and chronic CNS disease models described in the literature. Particular attention is given to utilizing M2 microglial polarization as a potential therapeutic option in treating diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                elodie.reboussin@inserm.fr
                jbuffault@15-20.fr
                fbaudouin@15-20.fr
                annabelle.reaux@inserm.fr
                luisa.riancho@inserm.fr
                celine.olmiere@theaopeninnovation.com
                jasahel@15-20.fr
                stephane.melik-parsadaniantz@inserm.fr
                cbaudouin@15-20.fr
                Journal
                J Neuroinflammation
                J Neuroinflammation
                Journal of Neuroinflammation
                BioMed Central (London )
                1742-2094
                2 March 2022
                2 March 2022
                2022
                : 19
                : 63
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.418241.a, ISNI 0000 0000 9373 1902, Sorbonne Université UM80, INSERM UMR 968, CNRS UMR 7210, Institut de la Vision, IHU FOReSIGHT, ; 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France
                [2 ]GRID grid.7429.8, ISNI 0000000121866389, Service 3, , CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, INSERM-DGOS CIC 1423, ; 28 rue de Charenton, 75012 Paris, France
                [3 ]GRID grid.481921.7, Laboratoire, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, ; 28 rue de Charenton, 75012 Paris, France
                [4 ]GRID grid.476517.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0631 9643, Laboratoires THEA, ; Clermont-Ferrand, France
                [5 ]GRID grid.21925.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, Department of Ophthalmology, , The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, ; Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9264-1133
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4599-9749
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2006-5384
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-9523
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0972-2117
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7551-1129
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-1153
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2029-9591
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1743-6698
                Article
                2418
                10.1186/s12974-022-02418-w
                8892697
                35236378
                8b686af7-7c87-41c6-b29c-f42acf3fac3f
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 3 November 2021
                : 18 February 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Neurosciences
                glaucoma,neuroprotection,immunomodulation,cellular therapy,mesenchymal stem cell,microglia,retinal ganglion cell

                Comments

                Comment on this article