26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bayesian model averaging method for evaluating associations between air pollution and respiratory mortality: a time-series study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To demonstrate an application of Bayesian model averaging (BMA) with generalised additive mixed models (GAMM) and provide a novel modelling technique to assess the association between inhalable coarse particles (PM 10) and respiratory mortality in time-series studies.

          Design

          A time-series study using regional death registry between 2009 and 2010.

          Setting

          8 districts in a large metropolitan area in Northern China.

          Participants

          9559 permanent residents of the 8 districts who died of respiratory diseases between 2009 and 2010.

          Main outcome measures

          Per cent increase in daily respiratory mortality rate (MR) per interquartile range (IQR) increase of PM 10 concentration and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) in single-pollutant and multipollutant (including NO x, CO) models.

          Results

          The Bayesian model averaged GAMM (GAMM+BMA) and the optimal GAMM of PM 10, multipollutants and principal components (PCs) of multipollutants showed comparable results for the effect of PM 10 on daily respiratory MR, that is, one IQR increase in PM 10 concentration corresponded to 1.38% vs 1.39%, 1.81% vs 1.83% and 0.87% vs 0.88% increase, respectively, in daily respiratory MR. However, GAMM+BMA gave slightly but noticeable wider CIs for the single-pollutant model (−1.09 to 4.28 vs −1.08 to 3.93) and the PCs-based model (−2.23 to 4.07 vs −2.03 vs 3.88). The CIs of the multiple-pollutant model from two methods are similar, that is, −1.12 to 4.85 versus −1.11 versus 4.83.

          Conclusions

          The BMA method may represent a useful tool for modelling uncertainty in time-series studies when evaluating the effect of air pollution on fatal health outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models.

          The development of models to assess air pollution exposures within cities for assignment to subjects in health studies has been identified as a priority area for future research. This paper reviews models for assessing intraurban exposure under six classes, including: (i) proximity-based assessments, (ii) statistical interpolation, (iii) land use regression models, (iv) line dispersion models, (v) integrated emission-meteorological models, and (vi) hybrid models combining personal or household exposure monitoring with one of the preceding methods. We enrich this review of the modelling procedures and results with applied examples from Hamilton, Canada. In addition, we qualitatively evaluate the models based on key criteria important to health effects assessment research. Hybrid models appear well suited to overcoming the problem of achieving population representative samples while understanding the role of exposure variation at the individual level. Remote sensing and activity-space analysis will complement refinements in pre-existing methods, and with expected advances, the field of exposure assessment may help to reduce scientific uncertainties that now impede policy intervention aimed at protecting public health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            On the use of generalized additive models in time-series studies of air pollution and health.

            F Dominici (2002)
            The widely used generalized additive models (GAM) method is a flexible and effective technique for conducting nonlinear regression analysis in time-series studies of the health effects of air pollution. When the data to which the GAM are being applied have two characteristics--1) the estimated regression coefficients are small and 2) there exist confounding factors that are modeled using at least two nonparametric smooth functions--the default settings in the gam function of the S-Plus software package (version 3.4) do not assure convergence of its iterative estimation procedure and can provide biased estimates of regression coefficients and standard errors. This phenomenon has occurred in time-series analyses of contemporary data on air pollution and mortality. To evaluate the impact of default implementation of the gam software on published analyses, the authors reanalyzed data from the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS) using three different methods: 1) Poisson regression with parametric nonlinear adjustments for confounding factors; 2) GAM with default convergence parameters; and 3) GAM with more stringent convergence parameters than the default settings. The authors found that pooled NMMAPS estimates were very similar under the first and third methods but were biased upward under the second method.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Systematic review of Chinese studies of short-term exposure to air pollution and daily mortality.

              Health effects attributable to air pollution exposure in Chinese population have been least understood. The authors conducted a meta-analysis on 33 time-series and case-crossover studies conducted in China to assess mortality effects of short-term exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters less than 10 and 2.5 μm (PM10 and PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3) and carbon monoxide (CO). Significant associations between air pollution exposure and increased mortality risks were observed in the pooled estimates for all pollutants of interest. In specific, each 10 μg/m(3) increase in PM2.5 was associated with a 0.38% (95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.31, 0.45) increase in total mortality, a 0.51% (95% CI: 0.30, 0.73) in respiratory mortality, and a 0.44% (95% CI: 0.33, 0.54) in cardiovascular mortality. When current annual PM2.5 levels in mega-Chinese cities to be reduced to the WHO Air Quality Guideline (AQG) of 10 μg/m(3), mortality attributable to short-term exposure to PM2.5 could be reduced by 2.7%, 1.7%, 2.3%, and 6.2% in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Xi'an, respectively. The authors recommend future studies on the nature of air pollution concentration and health effect relationships in Chinese population to support setting stringent air quality standards to improve public health. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2016
                16 August 2016
                : 6
                : 8
                : e011487
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, China
                [3 ]State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, China
                [4 ]Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of the Ministry of Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University , Shanghai, China
                [5 ]Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3), Fudan University , Shanghai, China
                [6 ]Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [7 ]Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University , Örebro, Sweden
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Xin Fang; xin.fang@ 123456ki.se
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3552-9153
                Article
                bmjopen-2016-011487
                10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011487
                5013441
                27531727
                8c9a7bd0-e30a-427c-ab00-e501f3ba910f
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 15 February 2016
                : 2 May 2016
                : 10 June 2016
                Categories
                Epidemiology
                Research
                1506
                1692
                1724

                Medicine
                bayesian model averaging,generalized additive mixed model,pm<sub>10</sub>,respiratory mortality,time-series study,model uncertainty

                Comments

                Comment on this article