0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interruption science as a research field: Towards a taxonomy of interruptions as a foundation for the field

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interruptions have become ubiquitous in both our personal and professional lives. Accordingly, research on interruptions has also increased steadily over time, and research published in various scientific disciplines has produced different perspectives, fundamental ideas, and conceptualizations of interruptions. However, the current state of research hampers a comprehensive overview of the concept of interruption, predominantly due to the fragmented nature of the existing literature. Reflecting on its genesis in the 1920s and the longstanding research on interruptions, along with recent technological, behavioral, and organizational developments, this paper provides a comprehensive interdisciplinary overview of the various attributes of an interruption, which facilitates the establishment of interruption science as an interdisciplinary research field in the scientific landscape. To obtain an overview of the different interruption attributes, we conducted a systematic literature review with the goal of classifying interruptions. The outcome of our research process is a taxonomy of interruptions, constituting an important foundation for the field. Based on the taxonomy, we also present possible avenues for future research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references161

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Working memory: looking back and looking forward.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Validating Instruments in MIS Research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                22 March 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1043426
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Digital Business Institute, School of Business and Management, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria , Steyr, Austria
                [2] 2Institute of Business Informatics – Information Engineering, Johannes Kepler University Linz , Linz, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jelmer Pieter Borst, University of Groningen, Netherlands

                Reviewed by: Helen Hodgetts, Cardiff Metropolitan University, United Kingdom; Nele Russwinkel, Technical University of Berlin, Germany

                *Correspondence: Fabian J. Stangl, Fabian.Stangl@ 123456fh-steyr.at

                This article was submitted to Performance Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1043426
                10074991
                37034958
                8d22f194-bfb5-484f-9ec6-f3c7cc0aac84
                Copyright © 2023 Stangl and Riedl.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 September 2022
                : 30 January 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 192, Pages: 18, Words: 16784
                Funding
                Funded by: Austrian Science Fund, doi 10.13039/501100002428;
                Funded by: Austrian Research Promotion Agency, doi 10.13039/501100004955;
                Categories
                Psychology
                Systematic Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                interruption,interruption science,interruption taxonomy,interruption classifications,interruption attributes,systematic literature review

                Comments

                Comment on this article