7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      City footprints and SDGs provide untapped potential for assessing city sustainability

      review-article
      1 , , 1 , 2
      Nature Communications
      Nature Publishing Group UK
      Environmental impact, Sustainability, Society

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cities are recognised as central to determining the sustainability of human development. However, assessment concepts that are able to ascertain whether or not a city is sustainable are only just emerging. Here we review literature since the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were agreed in 2015 and identify three strands of scientific inquiry and practice in assessing city sustainability. We find that further integration is needed. SDG monitoring and assessment of cities should take advantage of both consumption-based (footprint) accounting and benchmarking against planetary boundaries and social thresholds in order to achieve greater relevance for designing sustainable cities and urban lifestyles.

          Abstract

          Whether or not a city achieves absolute sustainability is difficult to assess with existing frameworks. Here the authors, in a review, show that a further integration of consumption-based accounting and benchmarking is necessary to aid the monitoring and assessment of Sustainable Development Goals in cities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet

          The planetary boundaries framework defines a safe operating space for humanity based on the intrinsic biophysical processes that regulate the stability of the Earth system. Here, we revise and update the planetary boundary framework, with a focus on the underpinning biophysical science, based on targeted input from expert research communities and on more general scientific advances over the past 5 years. Several of the boundaries now have a two-tier approach, reflecting the importance of cross-scale interactions and the regional-level heterogeneity of the processes that underpin the boundaries. Two core boundaries—climate change and biosphere integrity—have been identified, each of which has the potential on its own to drive the Earth system into a new state should they be substantially and persistently transgressed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A good life for all within planetary boundaries

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                t.wiedmann@unsw.edu.au
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                18 June 2021
                18 June 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 3758
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1005.4, ISNI 0000 0004 4902 0432, Sustainability Assessment Program (SAP), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, , UNSW, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1002.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7857, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, , Monash University, ; Melbourne, VIC Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-8887
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9954-6684
                Article
                23968
                10.1038/s41467-021-23968-2
                8213854
                34145276
                8d38cd3f-90f3-42c2-bc05-e06f6f7c405a
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 28 August 2020
                : 25 May 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100005416, Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway);
                Award ID: 287690
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Australian Research Council (Discovery Project grant DP190102277)
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                environmental impact,sustainability,society
                Uncategorized
                environmental impact, sustainability, society

                Comments

                Comment on this article