Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The expression of cytokeratins 7, 19, and 20 in primary and metastatic carcinomas of the liver.

      Modern Pathology
      Adenocarcinoma, metabolism, secondary, Bile Duct Neoplasms, pathology, Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Cholangiocarcinoma, Colorectal Neoplasms, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Intermediate Filament Proteins, Keratin-20, Keratins, Liver Neoplasms, Tumor Markers, Biological

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We performed immunohistochemical studies on 90 surgically resected liver tumors, including 30 tumors each from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CC), and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (MCA), using monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK 19, and CK 20 to examine the differences in the CK expressions in primary and metastatic carcinomas of the liver. We also investigated the usefulness of such expression in the differential diagnosis in addition to existing markers such as alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. For CK 7, all except for one (97%) of the CCs were diffusely positive, whereas only two (7%) HCCs and one (3%) MCAs were diffusely positive. For CK 19, 23 (77%) CCs and 19 (64%) MCAs were diffusely positive, whereas no HCCs were positive. For CK 20, 22 (74%) MCAs were diffusely positive, whereas no HCC and three (10%) CCs were diffusely positive. The findings concerning the expression of immunohistochemical CK are therefore considered to be useful in addition to the diagnostic criteria when making a differential diagnosis of primary and metastatic carcinomas of the liver.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article