144
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network’s STOP GAP trial (a multicentre trial of prednisolone versus ciclosporin for pyoderma gangrenosum): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare inflammatory skin disorder characterised by painful and rapidly progressing skin ulceration. PG can be extremely difficult to treat and patients often require systemic immunosuppression. Recurrent lesions of PG are common, but the relative rarity of this condition means that there is a lack of published evidence regarding its treatment. A systematic review published in 2005 found no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) relating to the treatment of PG. Since this time, one small RCT has been published comparing infliximab to placebo, but none of the commonly used systemic treatments for PG have been formally assessed. The UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network’s STOP GAP Trial has been designed to address this lack of trial evidence.

          Methods

          The objective is to assess whether oral ciclosporin is more effective than oral prednisolone for the treatment of PG. The trial design is a two-arm, observer-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial comparing ciclosporin (4 mg/kg/day) to prednisolone (0.75 mg/kg/day). A total of 140 participants are to be recruited over a period of 4 years, from up to 50 hospitals in the UK and Eire. Primary outcome of velocity of healing at 6 weeks is assessed blinded to treatment allocation (using digital images of the ulcers). Secondary outcomes include: (i) time to healing; (ii) global assessment of improvement; (iii) PG inflammation assessment scale score; (iv) self-reported pain; (v) health-related quality of life; (vi) time to recurrence; (vii) treatment failures; (viii) adverse reactions to study medications; and (ix) cost effectiveness/utility. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of PG (excluding granulomatous PG); measurable ulceration (that is, not pustular PG); and patients aged over 18 years old who are able to give informed consent are included in the trial. Randomisation is by computer generated code using permuted blocks of randomly varying size, stratified by lesion size, and presence or absence of underlying systemic disease (for example, rheumatoid arthritis).

          Patients who require topical therapy are asked to enter a parallel observational study (case series). If topical therapy fails and systemic therapy is required, participants are then considered for inclusion in the randomised trial.

          Trial registration

          Current controlled trials: ISRCTN35898459. Eudract No.2008-008291-14.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Infliximab for the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

          Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a chronic ulcerating skin condition that often occurs in association with inflammatory bowel disease. There have been a number of reports of PG responding to infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumour necrosis factor alpha. In the first randomised placebo controlled trial of any drug for the treatment of PG, we have studied the role of infliximab in this disorder. Patients 18 years of age or older with a clinical diagnosis of PG were invited to take part. Patients were randomised to receive an infusion of infliximab at 5 mg/kg or placebo at week 0. Patients were then assessed at week 2 and non-responders were offered open labelled infliximab. The primary end point was clinical improvement at week 2, with secondary end points being remission and improvement at week 6. Thirty patients were entered into the study. After randomisation, 13 patients received infliximab and 17 patients received placebo. At week 2, significantly more patients in the infliximab group had improved (46% (6/13)) compared with the placebo group (6% (1/17); p = 0.025). Overall, 29 patients received infliximab with 69% (20/29) demonstrating a beneficial clinical response. Remission rate at week 6 was 21% (6/29). There was no response in 31% (9/29) of patients. This study has demonstrated that infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg is superior to placebo in the treatment of PG. Open label treatment with infliximab also produced promising results. Infliximab treatment should be considered in patients with PG.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment recommendations for pyoderma gangrenosum: an evidence-based review of the literature based on more than 350 patients.

            Because the incidence of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is low, no prospective randomized controlled trials and only a few studies with case numbers of more than 15 patients have been published. To date no guidelines for treatment of PG have been established far. The aim of the study was to provide an evidence-based review of the literature and an evaluation of recommendations for PG treatment. We performed an electronic search using the PubMed database and the term "pyoderma-gangrenosum." Literature published in the English language during the past two decades was reviewed. All relevant studies that could be obtained regardless of the study design were evaluated for grades of recommendation and levels of evidence. Data on patient characteristics including severity of the disease, localization of lesions, associated diseases, and treatment procedures were abstracted and evaluated for therapeutic outcome. We conclude that therapeutic efficacy of systemic treatment with corticosteroids and cyclosporine is best documented in the literature for disseminated as well as for localized disease and should be considered first-line therapy. In cases that do not respond to this treatment, we recommend alternative therapeutic procedures (eg, systemic treatment with corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine; tacrolimus; infliximab; or plasmapheresis), considering additional factors including associated diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pyoderma gangrenosum: a report of 44 cases with follow-up.

              P Driesch (1997)
              Results of a study of 44 patients with pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) are presented. Each patient was diagnosed using standardized diagnostic criteria and followed up systematically. Thirty patients were women and 14 men. Their mean age was 50 years (range 11-80). Twenty patients had idiopathic and 14 parainflammatory occurrences (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease), whereas in 10 patients an associated haemoproliferative disease or neoplasia was noted. Whereas idiopathic and parainflammatory PG was found predominantly in women, the association with haemoproliferative diseases occurred more often in men. The lower legs and feet represented the typical predilection sites. Fifty-two per cent of patients had one lesion, 37% had up to five, and 11% had more than five lesions. Histologically, lymphocytic and/or leucocytoclastic vasculitis was present in 73% of the biopsy specimens obtained from the borders of the lesions. Long-term follow-up (n = 42, median follow-up 26.5 months) revealed that eight patients had died, in six cases due to the PG and/or the underlying diseases. Of the remaining 34 patients, 44% are in complete remission without further treatment, whereas continuing therapy is needed in 56%. No difference between idiopathic and parainflammatory PG was demonstrable in the follow-up and in no patient with idiopathic PG was a possibly related disease diagnosed in the follow-up. These data suggest that PG should be considered to be an independent disease and not a purely cutaneous complication in most patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central
                1745-6215
                2012
                28 April 2012
                : 13
                : 51
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Dermatology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK
                [2 ]University of Nottingham, Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, King’s Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, UK
                [3 ]Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, South Block, Queen’s Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
                [4 ]University of Aberdeen, Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, 3 rd floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
                [5 ]Division of Applied Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK
                [6 ]University of Durham, School of Medicine and Health, University of Durham, Queen's Campus, Wolfson Research Institute, University Boulevard, Stockton-on-Tees, TS17 6BH, UK
                Article
                1745-6215-13-51
                10.1186/1745-6215-13-51
                3423010
                22540770
                8e7efa7f-ae12-4213-ae3e-bf450a48e01d
                Copyright ©2012 Craig et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 December 2011
                : 28 April 2012
                Categories
                Study Protocol

                Medicine
                pyoderma gangrenosum,ciclosporin (cyclosporin),prednisolone,rct
                Medicine
                pyoderma gangrenosum, ciclosporin (cyclosporin), prednisolone, rct

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content126

                Cited by11

                Most referenced authors197