Steam reforming is the method of choice if hydrogen has to be produced from methanol
in high yields.[1] Under ideal conditions, the reaction converts methanol and water
into carbon dioxide and three moles of hydrogen in a moderately endothermic transformation,
as shown in Equation (1).
(1)
Currently, steam reforming of methanol is receiving much attention in the context
of methanol-based energy-storage systems.[2] Methanol is considered as a promising
candidate for hydrogen storage to utilize regenerative excess energies. To complete
the storage cycle, more efficient catalyst systems for MeOH steam reforming are of
great technical interest. Such decentralized hydrogen production from MeOH would greatly
benefit from high catalyst selectivity towards H2 and CO2 at the lowest possible temperature.
Formation of CO has to be avoided as much as possible, because CO acts as a strong
poison for almost all fuel cell catalysts.[3] Low temperature activity is highly desirable
to leverage heat integration potentials between the endothermic steam reforming and
the exothermic fuel cell operation. Currently, the reported limit for high temperature
PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell systems is 180 °C.[4] This is a temperature
level too low for operating the MeOH steam reforming reaction with high hydrogen yields.
Two different classes of heterogeneous catalysts dominate research and industrial
practice of MeOH steam reforming: Pd or Pt on different types of supports and Cu/ZnO
systems.[1, 5] The commercial Cu/ZnO systems are indeed very active and selective
but they require lengthy activation procedures. Typically, the catalyst is in contact
with a diluted stream of hydrogen for several hours. Such catalyst preformation is
inappropriate for most fluctuating hydrogen production scenarios. In addition, Cu
based catalysts are highly pyrophoric in their activated state, a fact that complicates
the practical handling of these materials in dynamic on–off cycles.
Because of these unfavorable characteristics of the Cu/ZnO systems we focused our
research on optimization of supported Pt catalysts for MeOH steam reforming. Herein,
we report that Pt on alumina catalysts exhibit an exceedingly enhanced activity and
selectivity after surface modification with a thin-film coating of hygroscopic and
basic inorganic salts.
Initially, our idea was to modify the Pt on alumina system by a molten salt coating
to benefit from the known low hydrogen solubility of these liquid salts for manipulating
the hydrogen release kinetics of the system.[6] Chemical modification of heterogeneous
catalyst contacts by liquid salt films is not new and is referred to as solid catalyst
with ionic liquid layer (SCILL) in literature.[7] SCILL catalysts take advantage of
specific physico-chemical properties of the ionic-liquid (IL) coating (e.g. differential
solubility effects)[6] but also benefit from distinct chemical interactions between
the liquid salt and the active surface sites. Owing to the extremely low vapor pressure
of the IL, the IL film resides on the catalyst surface under the conditions of continuous
gas-phase reactions. Enhanced selectivities have been demonstrated for SCILL systems,
for example, in hydrogenation catalysis.[8] Recently, the microscopic origin of the
observed selectivity effects for SCILL systems has been explained by a series of surface-science
experiments.[9]
From previous work, we knew that ionic liquids carrying organic, heterocyclic cations
(e.g. imidazolium ions) would not withstand the reaction conditions applied in MeOH
steam reforming (temperatures up to 230 °C; vapor atmosphere). Some of us have reported
recently that slow imidazolium hydrolysis takes place under these conditions, liberating
coordinating amines.[10] Consequently, we selected for this work the inorganic molten
salt mixture Li/K/Cs acetate (molar ratio=0.2/0.275/0.525)[11] for modifying the surface
of the Pt (5 wt %) on alumina catalyst. The applied salt mixture has a glass transition
point at 33 °C and a melting point in the dry state of 119 °C.[12] At a typical reaction
temperature of 200 °C, its density in the dry state is 2.06 g cm−3 and its viscosity
is 39 mPas. This mixture is highly hygroscopic and the addition of water sharply decreases
the melting point, viscosity, and density. The molten-salt-coated Pt on alumina catalyst
was obtained by applying a defined amount of salt to the heterogeneous catalyst in
water, followed by solvent removal and drying under vacuum. The amount of mixture
was calculated to adjust a certain mass loading, with w being the mass of salt divided
by the mass of the neat catalyst.
All MeOH steam-reforming experiments were carried out in a continuous fixed bed reactor
set up (see Supporting Information for details) by bringing the catalyst in contact
with a gaseous stream of MeOH and water. Figure 1 and 2 show the catalytic performances
of the uncoated Pt on alumina catalyst (Figure 1) and the respective salt-modified
catalyst (w=30 wt %; Figure 2) for comparison. Both experiments used the same molar
amount of Pt (n
Pt=1×10−4 mol) and very similar reaction conditions (residence time τ≈10 s, temperature
range 190–230 °C in defined steps).
Figure 1
Continuous steam reforming of methanol using an uncoated Pt/alumina catalyst (▪=TOF;
○=
). Experimental conditions: T=230–190 °C (see vertical lines); p
tot=5 bar; p
MeOH=
0.5 bar; m
cat=401.4 mg; τ=10 s.
Figure 2
Continuous steam reforming of methanol using a Li/K/Cs[OAc] coated Pt/alumina catalyst,
w=30 wt % (▪=TOF; ○=
). Experimental conditions: T=230–200 °C; p
tot=5 bar; p
MeOH=
0.5 bar; m
cat=521.8 mg; τ=10 s.
Remarkably, the molten-salt-coated catalyst exhibited a strongly enhanced CO2 selectivity
(99 % CO2 selectivity at 230 °C with coating compared to 62 % without coating) and
a significantly higher catalytic activity (turn over frequency (TOF)=36 h−1 at 230
°C with coating compared to 22 h−1 without coating; all TOF values were calculated
with respect to the total Pt content of the catalyst). For the catalyst with salt
modification, an activation energy of 55±2 kJ mol−1 was determined, compared to 64±2
kJ mol−1 for the uncoated catalyst.
A variation of the salt loading w in subsequent experiments (5–30 wt %, see Figure
3) showed a remarkable dependency of the catalyst performance on the level of molten-salt
loading (Figure 3 and 4). For loadings above 7.5 wt %, a step change in activity and
selectivity was observed, while loadings of only 5 wt % caused even a slight deactivation
as compared to the unmodified catalyst. Reasons for this behavior include the fact
that the molten salt coating is very hygroscopic and basic. Thus, the molten-salt
layer increases the availability of water at the active sites, while the very low
solubility of H2 in the salt leads to effective H2 removal from the active surface.
The concentration of hydroxide ions is known to play an important role in the catalytic
conversion of CO and water into CO2 and hydrogen (water–gas shift reaction, WGSR).[13]
The basic acetate coating obviously enhances the rate of this step, leading to a drastic
shift in selectivity.
Figure 3
Turn over frequency versus temperature for different Li/K/Cs acetate salt loadings
(w) in continuous methanol steam reforming catalysis: T=200–230 °C; p
tot=5 bar; p
MeOH=
0.5 bar; n
Pt=1×10−4 mol; τ=10 s.
Figure 4
CO2 selectivity versus temperature for different Li/K/Cs acetate salt loadings (w)
in continuous methanol steam reforming catalysis: T=200–230 °C; p
tot=5 bar; p
MeOH=
0.5 bar; n
Pt=1×10−4 mol; τ=10 s.
We next investigated whether the presence of alkali ions in the molten salt, in addition
to its hygroscopic and basic nature, was also relevant for the enhanced performance
of the catalyst. Promotion of catalytic activity by alkali ions is known in the literature
under the term “alkali doping” and is of highest technical relevance to the performance.
The preparation of industrial catalysts for ammonia or methanol synthesis, hydrogenation
or dehydrogenation reactions, as well as sulphuric acid production involve the use
of alkali-containing compounds.[14] In the case of the WGSR and MeOH steam reforming,
it has been reported that lithium- or sodium-doped Pt/ceria catalysts are more active
than the respective unmodified catalysts. As demonstrated in the literature by diffuse
reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) investigations, the main reason for
these enhanced activities is a weakening of the C–H bonds of the formate intermediates
by the alkali dopant leading to an accelerated dehydrogenation of the reaction intermediates.[15]
In the case of the WGSR with Pt on Al2O3 modified by sodium or potassium hydroxide,
it has been proposed that the active Pt species becomes partly oxidized through the
respective alkali oxides leading to an enhanced CO adsorption and water activation.[16]
For H2 production through formic acid decomposition, it has been reported that the
reaction rate of a Pd/C catalyst could be enhanced by one to two orders of magnitude
through surface modification with potassium.[17]
To check such influences for our molten salt coated systems, IR spectroscopic investigations
were carried out with a DRIFTS spectrometer. Figure 5 shows the CO region for loadings
w=0–30 wt %. Starting with the spectra of the uncoated surface, the largest absorption
is visible at 2084 cm−1 with a shoulder at 2030 cm−1 and a less intense feature at
1840 cm−1. The intensity of the band at 2084 cm−1 remains mostly unchanged up to 15
wt % but is only half as intense at 30 wt %. The band at 2030 cm−1 continuously shifts
to lower wavenumbers and distinguishes itself from the higher frequency band at w=7.5
wt %. The feature at 1840 cm−1 shifts similarly and gains intensity with increased
loading. The evolution of the bands is such that the relative intensities on the spectra
acquired for w=30 wt % loading are completely different from the rest of the series,
with the band at 2084 cm−1 shifting to the less intense one and the bands at 2030
cm−1 and 1840 cm−1 dominating the spectra.
Figure 5
CO region of the DRIFTS spectra for different salt loadings (w, increasing from top
to bottom).
CO on Pt particles is a well-studied system and we can interpret our spectra based
on the literature. The band at 2084 cm−1 is known to correspond to on-top CO at terraces,
the band at 2030 cm−1 to on-top CO at particle edges, and the less intense band at
1840 cm−1 to CO bridged on terraces.[18] Notably, the intensities measured do not
reflect the abundance of CO on the different sites because of the dipole coupling
and intensity transfers occurring on the metallic surfaces.[19] Surface science studies
on alkali doping provide an interpretation of the spectral changes observed herein.[20]
Indeed, the loss of intensity of the 2084 cm−1 band and the shift of the other two
bands suggest that the alkali metal displaces on-top CO at terraces and particle edges
to the bridged sites on the terraces. Other effects proposed are short-range interactions
between the dopant and CO and electron transfer from the alkali to the antibonding
2π orbitals of CO by way of the Pt d-bands.[20]
Figure 6 shows spectra with w=30 wt % loading acquired with the mixture used in the
catalytic tests compared to the separated components at a comparable loading and a
clean surface. Pure Li[OAc] and pure Cs[OAc] have remarkably different spectroscopic
signatures compared to the mixture. In contrast, the K[OAc] spectrum exhibits clear
similarities with the spectra of the salt mixture, showing that—within the mixed molten
salts—potassium has the strongest affinity for the surface. The effect of alkali doping
originates from an electron transfer from the alkali metal to the substrate, resulting
in stronger bonding of the adsorbed gas. Potassium was reported to have the strongest
influence on Pt(111).[20] At the surface, the salt mixture and pure K[OAc] have very
similar effects on the spectra compared to elemental potassium.[20]
Figure 6
CO region of the DRIFTS spectra for different alkali acetates: lithium, cesium, potassium
acetate, and the mixture of the three acetates, compared to the uncoated Pt catalyst.
We next tried to verify the influence of K[OAc] in the applied salt mixture on the
MeOH steam reforming catalysis. Fortunately, the melting points of the applied salts
were not a limiting factor for the specific case of MeOH steam reforming, because
the presence of water in the catalyst pores liquefies any hygroscopic salt coating.
Therefore, it was possible to test the coating effect of the three alkali acetates
separately (the salt coating was 30 wt % for each). In excellent agreement with our
spectroscopic results, we found that the catalyst coated with potassium acetate showed
the highest increase in activity and selectivity compared to the neat Pt on alumina
contact (all catalytic results are shown in the Supporting Information). Note that
the system coated with K[OAc] showed stable catalytic performance down to 200 °C,
despite the melting point of the salt being as high as 292 °C, again reflecting the
extremely hygroscopic nature of this salt. The same catalyst system showed stable
activity and selectivity over 500 h on-stream indicating that the beneficial effect
of the salt coating is not lost over time by leaching or salt decomposition effects
(see Supporting Information). In line with our hypothesis that a hygroscopic, basic,
and K+ containing salt would cause the strongest enhancement in activity and selectivity,
we also tested coatings of equimolar amounts of KOH (w=17.15 wt %) and K[HCO3] (w=30.6
wt %) on the same Pt on alumina contact under otherwise identical conditions. As expected,
we also found drastically enhanced activity and selectivity (at T=230 °C: TOFKOH=50
h−1,
99 % and
41 h−1,
99.5 %; for details see the Supporting Information) compared to the uncoated Pt on
alumina contact (at T=230 °C: TOFuncoated=22 h−1,
62 %). A comparable experiment with a K[NTf2] coated catalyst revealed very low catalytic
activity and selectivity (
2 h−1,
15 %), demonstrating that the interplay of alkali doping, salt hygroscopicity, and
salt basicity is essential for the observed catalyst modification effects.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a synthetically straight-forward, highly effective
way to drastically enhance the activity and selectivity of heterogeneous Pt contacts
in the methanol steam reforming reaction. According to our spectroscopic findings,
alkali doping by potassium species certainly plays an important role but additional
contributions from the hygroscopicity and basicity of the salt were also found. We
anticipate that the modification of classical heterogeneous catalysts by molten salt
coatings can be used in the future as a rational and general approach to optimize
heterogeneous catalysts through surface modification or co-adsorption effects. Further
exploring the potential of this method should cause advances in molten-salt chemistry,
surface science, catalyst preparation, and reaction engineering.
Experimental Section
Materials: Pt on aluminum oxide was purchased from Alfa Aesar (LOT: F02R004, Pt content=4.86
wt %). Li[OAc], K[OAc], Cs[OAc], K[HCO3] were received from Sigma Aldrich with a purity
of 99.99 %. KOH (Merck) was of 99.9 % purity.
Synthesis of salt-modified catalysts: The calculated amount of Pt on support was immersed
into a solution of the salt or salt mixture in water (typically 20 mL). After mixing
for 30 min at 25 °C the solvent was removed under vacuum.
Catalytic experiments: The catalyst performance in MeOH steam reforming was evaluated
in a continuously operated gas-phase fixed-bed reactor similar to the one described
elsewhere[21] (details are found in the Supporting Information). An equimolar mixture
of MeOH and water was evaporated and fed into the reactor. At the reactor outlet,
unconverted MeOH and water were condensed and the product gas was analyzed by GC (Varian
CP 4900). Catalyst activities are given as turn over frequencies (TOF), which is the
total molar flow of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and methane divided by the total
molar amount of platinum in the reactor (typically 1×10−4 mol). Selectivities
are given as the CO2 mole fraction in the outlet gas stream divided by the sum of
the moles of CO2, CO, and CH4. The mass balance was closed by the quantification of
the inert gas, nitrogen.
DRIFTS experiments: The catalyst characterization was performed in a Bruker Vertex
80v infrared spectrometer equipped with a Praying Mantis and a high temperature reaction
chamber (HVC-DRP-4) from Harrick. An extension with all necessary feed-throughs was
adjoined to the sample chamber of the spectrometer to allow for the evacuation of
the optical path. Mass flows and pressures were regulated using Bronkhorst mass flow
and pressure controllers. Prior to CO adsorption, the catalyst powder was heated under
an Ar flow (Linde, >99.9999 %, 10 mLN min−1, 1 bar) at 300 °C for 30 min to desorb
water and other contaminants. After exposure to CO (Linde, >99.997 %, 10 mLN min−1)
at 25 °C for 10 min, the reactor was purged thoroughly with Ar for 60 min until no
CO gas-phase signal could be detected anymore. The IR spectra were recorded with a
spectral resolution of 2 cm−1, 1024 scans, and a scanning speed of 40 kHz. The reference
spectrum was pristine alumina exposed to the same treatment.