7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis of the Changes and Possible Reasons in Aberrations before and after Surgery in Patients with Concomitant Exotropia

      research-article
      , , , ,
      Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
      Hindawi

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The objective is to observe the changes in aberrations before and after surgery in patients with common horizontal strabismus and to analyze the possible reasons for the changes.

          Methods

          Forty eyes of 40 cases with concomitant exotropia who underwent strabismus correction at the Ophthalmology Department of Nantong University Hospital from October 2020 to July 2021 were included in this study, all of whom underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with a medial rectus resection in the same eye. Aberration parameters were measured 1 day before surgery and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Differences in the indicators at each time period were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) of repeated measures data for a single factor, and data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 statistical application software.

          Results

          5 mm pupil diameter: the preoperative and postoperative RMS of total aberration showed statistically significant difference ( P < 0.01). Postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison at each period after surgery showed statistically significant differences between 6 months after surgery ( P=0.002) and preoperative comparison. The preoperative and postoperative comparison of RMS in LOAs was statistically significant ( P < 0.01); postoperative test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there were statistically significant differences between 1 week ( P=0.033) and 6 months ( P=0.002) after operation. The difference of RMS of defocus before and after operation was statistically significant ( P < 0.01); postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there was statistically significant difference between 6 months after operation ( P=0.007) and preoperative comparison. There was statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative RMS of HOAs ( P=0.013). Postoperative test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there was statistically significant difference 6 months after surgery ( P=0.03). The RMS of secondary astigmatism showed a statistically significant difference before and after operation ( P=0.001), and the postoperation test (Bonferroni method) showed a statistically significant difference 6 months after operation ( P=0.002). In 5 mm pupil diameter, the preoperative and postoperative RMS of total aberration showed statistically significant difference ( P < 0.01), postoperative test (Bonferroni method) was used to compare each period after surgery with that before surgery, and there were statistically significant differences between 1 week after surgery ( P=0.034), 3 months after surgery ( P=0.033), and 6 months after surgery ( P=0.003). The preoperative and postoperative comparison of RMS in LOAs was statistically significant ( P < 0.01), postoperative test (Bonferroni method) was used to compare each period after surgery with that before surgery, and there were statistically significant differences between 1 week after surgery ( P=0.04), 3 months after surgery ( P=0.034), and 6 months after surgery ( P=0.004). The difference of RMS of defocus before and after surgery was statistically significant ( P=0.002), and the comparison between postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperation showed that the difference was statistically significant 6 months after surgery ( P=0.027). The RMS of astigmatism showed statistically significant difference before and after operation ( P=0.002), and the postoperation test (Bonferroni method) showed statistically significant difference between 6 months after operation ( P=0.009) and before operation.

          Conclusion

          We found that horizontal rectus surgery had a transient effect on LOAs and almost no effect on HOAs. Long-term follow-up is recommended after strabismus surgery to observe eye position and binocular visual function. Because of the high prevalence of strabismus in adolescents, long-term observation of the eye axis and aberration is recommended.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New Perspectives on Dry Eye Definition and Diagnosis: A Consensus Report by the Asia Dry Eye Society

          For the last 20 years, a great amount of evidence has accumulated through epidemiological studies that most of the dry eye disease encountered in daily life, especially in video display terminal (VDT) workers, involves short tear film breakup time (TFBUT) type dry eye, a category characterized by severe symptoms but minimal clinical signs other than short TFBUT. An unstable tear film also affects the visual function, possibly due to the increase of higher order aberrations. Based on the change in the understanding of the types, symptoms, and signs of dry eye disease, the Asia Dry Eye Society agreed to the following definition of dry eye: "Dry eye is a multifactorial disease characterized by unstable tear film causing a variety of symptoms and/or visual impairment, potentially accompanied by ocular surface damage." The definition stresses instability of the tear film as well as the importance of visual impairment, highlighting an essential role for TFBUT assessment. This paper discusses the concept of Tear Film Oriented Therapy (TFOT), which evolved from the definition of dry eye, emphasizing the importance of a stable tear film.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Efficacy in myopia control

            There is rapidly expanding interest in interventions to slow myopia progression in children and teenagers, with the intent of reducing risk of myopia-associated complications later in life. Despite many publications dedicated to the topic, little attention has been devoted to understanding 'efficacy' in myopia control and its application. Treatment effect has been expressed in multiple ways, making comparison between therapies and prognosis for an individual patient difficult. Available efficacy data are generally limited to two to three years making long-term treatment effect uncertain. From an evidence-based perspective, efficacy projection should be conservative and not extend beyond that which has been empirically established. Using this principle, review of the literature, data from our own clinical studies, assessment of demonstrated myopia control treatments and allowance for the limitations and context of available data, we arrive at the following important interpretations: (i) axial elongation is the preferred endpoint for assessing myopic progression; (ii) there is insufficient evidence to suggest that faster progressors, or younger myopes, derive greater benefit from treatment; (iii) the initial rate of reduction of axial elongation by myopia control treatments is not sustained; (iv) consequently, using percentage reduction in progression as an index to describe treatment effect can be very misleading and (v) cumulative absolute reduction in axial elongation (CARE) emerges as a preferred efficacy metric; (vi) maximum CARE that has been measured for existing myopia control treatments is 0.44 mm (which equates to about 1 D); (vii) there is no apparent superior method of treatment, although commonly prescribed therapies such as 0.01% atropine and progressive addition spectacles lenses have not consistently provided clinically important effects; (viii) while different treatments have shown divergent efficacy in the first year, they have shown only small differences after this; (ix) rebound should be assumed until proven otherwise; (x) an illusion of inflated efficacy is created by measurement error in refraction, sample bias in only treating 'measured' fast progressors and regression to the mean; (xi) decision to treat should be based on age of onset (or refraction at a given age), not past progression; (xii) the decreased risk of complications later in life provided by even modest reductions in progression suggest treatment is advised for all young myopes and, because of limitations of available interventions, should be aggressive.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Global and regional prevalence of strabismus: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Comput Intell Neurosci
                Comput Intell Neurosci
                cin
                Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
                Hindawi
                1687-5265
                1687-5273
                2022
                5 September 2022
                : 2022
                : 5207553
                Affiliations
                Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: D. Plewczynski

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-776X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-5380
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7271-7906
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4948-0992
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-7044
                Article
                10.1155/2022/5207553
                9467761
                8f3294b7-fe0f-4eef-a856-571ca5877947
                Copyright © 2022 Xixi Zhang et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 6 July 2022
                : 21 July 2022
                : 16 August 2022
                Categories
                Research Article

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article