16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Convolutional Neural Network–Based Automated Segmentation of the Spinal Cord and Contusion Injury: Deep Learning Biomarker Correlates of Motor Impairment in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

          Our aim was to use 2D convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and traumatic contusion injury from axial T2-weighted MR imaging in a cohort of patients with acute spinal cord injury.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS:

          Forty-seven patients who underwent 3T MR imaging within 24 hours of spinal cord injury were included. We developed an image-analysis pipeline integrating 2D convolutional neural networks for whole spinal cord and intramedullary spinal cord lesion segmentation. Linear mixed modeling was used to compare test segmentation results between our spinal cord injury convolutional neural network (Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation) and current state-of-the-art methods. Volumes of segmented lesions were then used in a linear regression analysis to determine associations with motor scores.

          RESULTS:

          Compared with manual labeling, the average test set Dice coefficient for the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation model was 0.93 for spinal cord segmentation versus 0.80 for PropSeg and 0.90 for DeepSeg (both components of the Spinal Cord Toolbox). Linear mixed modeling showed a significant difference between Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation compared with PropSeg (P < .001) and DeepSeg ( P < .05). Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation showed significantly better adaptability to damaged areas compared with PropSeg ( P < .001) and DeepSeg ( P < .02). The contusion injury volumes based on automated segmentation were significantly associated with motor scores at admission ( P = .002) and discharge ( P = .009).

          CONCLUSIONS:

          Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation of the spinal cord compares favorably with available segmentation tools in a population with acute spinal cord injury. Volumes of injury derived from automated lesion segmentation with Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation correlate with measures of motor impairment in the acute phase. Targeted convolutional neural network training in acute spinal cord injury enhances algorithm performance for this patient population and provides clinically relevant metrics of cord injury.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          ajnr
          ajnr
          AJNR
          AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
          American Society of Neuroradiology
          0195-6108
          1936-959X
          April 2019
          : 40
          : 4
          : 737-744
          Affiliations
          [1] aFrom the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.B.M., S.M.D., J.N., J.F.T.)
          [2] bNeurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.)
          [3] cBrain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
          [4] dDepartments of Neurology (V.S.)
          [5] eOrthopedic Surgery (L.P.), Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
          [6] fNeuroPoly Lab (C.G., J.C.-A.), Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
          Author notes
          Please address correspondence to Jason F. Talbott, MD, PhD, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Ave, Room 1X57C, San Francisco, CA 94110; e-mail: jason.talbott@ 123456ucsf.edu
          Author information
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2425-1923
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9659-7056
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4318-0024
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-9532
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5594-4277
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-1608
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-4166
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-0240
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-3532
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2887-4231
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-6217
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-5796
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-3631
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2243-7054
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6891-2722
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8568-6640
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-5530
          Article
          PMC7048524 PMC7048524 7048524 18-01117
          10.3174/ajnr.A6020
          7048524
          30923086
          8ff322b4-e066-44b0-a127-93bf69c29260
          © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology

          Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

          History
          : 9 November 2018
          : 11 February 2019
          Funding
          Funded by: Department of Defense
          Award ID: SC120259
          Funded by: Craig H. Neilsen Foundation , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100005191;
          Categories
          Spine

          Comments

          Comment on this article