18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sample composition alters associations between age and brain structure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite calls to incorporate population science into neuroimaging research, most studies recruit small, non-representative samples. Here, we examine whether sample composition influences age-related variation in global measurements of gray matter volume, thickness, and surface area. We apply sample weights to structural brain imaging data from a community-based sample of children aged 3–18 ( N = 1162) to create a “weighted sample” that approximates the distribution of socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and sex in the U.S. Census. We compare associations between age and brain structure in this weighted sample to estimates from the original sample with no sample weights applied (i.e., unweighted). Compared to the unweighted sample, we observe earlier maturation of cortical and sub-cortical structures, and patterns of brain maturation that better reflect known developmental trajectories in the weighted sample. Our empirical demonstration of bias introduced by non-representative sampling in this neuroimaging cohort suggests that sample composition may influence understanding of fundamental neural processes.

          Abstract

          The influence of sample composition on human neuroimaging results is unknown. Here, the authors weight a large, community-based sample to better reflect the US population and describe how applying these sample weights changes conclusions about age-related variation in brain structure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI.

          We present a novel skull-stripping algorithm based on a hybrid approach that combines watershed algorithms and deformable surface models. Our method takes advantage of the robustness of the former as well as the surface information available to the latter. The algorithm first localizes a single white matter voxel in a T1-weighted MRI image, and uses it to create a global minimum in the white matter before applying a watershed algorithm with a preflooding height. The watershed algorithm builds an initial estimate of the brain volume based on the three-dimensional connectivity of the white matter. This first step is robust, and performs well in the presence of intensity nonuniformities and noise, but may erode parts of the cortex that abut bright nonbrain structures such as the eye sockets, or may remove parts of the cerebellum. To correct these inaccuracies, a surface deformation process fits a smooth surface to the masked volume, allowing the incorporation of geometric constraints into the skull-stripping procedure. A statistical atlas, generated from a set of accurately segmented brains, is used to validate and potentially correct the segmentation, and the MRI intensity values are locally re-estimated at the boundary of the brain. Finally, a high-resolution surface deformation is performed that accurately matches the outer boundary of the brain, resulting in a robust and automated procedure. Studies by our group and others outperform other publicly available skull-stripping tools. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Automatically Parcellating the Human Cerebral Cortex

            B Fischl (2004)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging.

              This review outlines recent findings from human neuroimaging concerning the role of a highly interconnected network of brain areas including orbital and medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, striatum and dopaminergic mid-brain in reward processing. Distinct reward-related functions can be attributed to different components of this network. Orbitofrontal cortex is involved in coding stimulus reward value and in concert with the amygdala and ventral striatum is implicated in representing predicted future reward. Such representations can be used to guide action selection for reward, a process that depends, at least in part, on orbital and medial prefrontal cortex as well as dorsal striatum.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kaja.lewinn@ucsf.edu
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                12 October 2017
                12 October 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 874
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, GRID grid.266102.1, Department of Psychiatry, , University of California, ; San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, 94143 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000122483208, GRID grid.10698.36, Clinical Psychology Department, , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, ; 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000419368729, GRID grid.21729.3f, Department of Epidemiology, , Columbia University, ; 722 West 168th Street #724, New York, NY 10032 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000122986657, GRID grid.34477.33, Department of Psychology, , University of Washington, ; Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1362-2410
                Article
                908
                10.1038/s41467-017-00908-7
                5638928
                29026076
                8ff39fc6-51b5-45b2-b904-595e6cbc39fd
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 7 September 2016
                : 1 August 2017
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article