2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of scent lure on camera trap detections vary across mammalian predator and prey species

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Camera traps are a unique survey tool used to monitor a wide variety of mammal species. Camera trap (CT) data can be used to estimate animal distribution, density, and behaviour. Attractants, such as scent lures, are often used in an effort to increase CT detections; however, the degree which the effects of attractants vary across species is not well understood. We investigated the effects of scent lure on mammal detections by comparing detection rates between 404 lured and 440 unlured CT stations sampled in Alberta, Canada over 120 day survey periods between February and August in 2015 and 2016. We used zero-inflated negative binomial generalized linear mixed models to test the effect of lure on detection rates for a) all mammals, b) six functional groups (all predator species, all prey, large carnivores, small carnivores, small mammals, ungulates), and c) four varied species of management interest (fisher, Pekania pennanti; gray wolf, Canis lupus; moose, Alces alces; and Richardson’s ground squirrel; Urocitellus richardsonii). Mammals were detected at 800 of the 844 CTs, with nearly equal numbers of total detections at CTs with (7110) and without (7530) lure, and variable effects of lure on groups and individual species. Scent lure significantly increased detections of predators as a group, including large and small carnivore sub-groups and fisher specifically, but not of gray wolf. There was no effect of scent lure on detections of prey species, including the small mammal and ungulate sub-groups and moose and Richardson’s ground squirrel specifically. We recommend that researchers explicitly consider the variable effects of scent lure on CT detections across species when designing, interpreting, or comparing multi-species surveys. Additional research is needed to further quantify variation in species responses to scent lures and other attractants, and to elucidate the effect of attractants on community-level inferences from camera trap surveys.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          REVIEW: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Surveys using camera traps: are we looking to a brighter future?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                12 May 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 5
                : e0229055
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Forest Resources Management, Wildlife Coexistence Lab, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [2 ] Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                University of South Carolina, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-5286
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-3847
                Article
                PONE-D-20-02366
                10.1371/journal.pone.0229055
                7217433
                32396558
                90145d13-fd9f-44e4-a9f2-609ae34b709f
                © 2020 Holinda et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 26 January 2020
                : 24 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001804, Canada Research Chairs;
                Award Recipient :
                This research was supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Predation
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Predation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Eutheria
                Carnivora
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Wolves
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Moose
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Rodents
                Squirrels
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Surveys
                Custom metadata
                Data from this study were provided by a third party, the Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute (ABMI), under a Data Sharing Agreement that does not permit the authors to redistribute the data. Camera trap detection data may be obtained directly from the ABMI website ( https://abmi.ca/home/data-analytics/da-top/da-product-overview/remote-camera-mammal-data/remote-camera-mammal-data-download.html). The ABMI does not release the exact locations of their monitoring locations (as part of their policy designed to protect the integrity of their long-term monitoring sites), but the data on habitat and disturbance at camera stations can be obtained by request from the ABMI ( https://abmi.ca), specifically the Director of the Information Centre (Tara Narwani, 780-492-5531, tnarwani@ 123456ualberta.ca , https://www.abmi.ca/home/contact-us/abmi-directory.html).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article