18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Performance Assessment and Selection of Normalization Procedures for Single-Cell RNA-Seq

      , , , , , , ,
      Cell Systems
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Systematic measurement biases make normalization an essential step in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis. There may be multiple competing considerations behind the assessment of normalization performance, of which some may be study specific. We have developed “scone”— a flexible framework for assessing performance based on a comprehensive panel of data-driven metrics. Through graphical summaries and quantitative reports, “scone” summarizes trade-offs and ranks large numbers of normalization methods by panel performance. The method is implemented in the open-source Bioconductor R software package SCONE. We show that top-performing normalization methods lead to better agreement with independent validation data for a collection of scRNA-seq datasets. SCONE can be downloaded at http://bioconductor.org/packages/scone/ . We have developed an approach for exploratory analysis and normalization of scRNA-seq data that enables execution of a wide array of normalization procedures and provides principled assessment of their performance based on a comprehensive set of data-driven performance metrics.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cell Systems
          Cell Systems
          Elsevier BV
          24054712
          April 2019
          April 2019
          : 8
          : 4
          : 315-328.e8
          Article
          10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.010
          6544759
          31022373
          90302a84-2e9f-4676-bce6-009c0f07e3b1
          © 2019

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article