7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Symbol relations training improves cognitive functioning in students with neurodevelopmental disorders

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

            <i>Statistical Power Analysis</i> is a nontechnical guide to power analysis in research planning that provides users of applied statistics with the tools they need for more effective analysis. The Second Edition includes: <br> * a chapter covering power analysis in set correlation and multivariate methods;<br> * a chapter considering effect size, psychometric reliability, and the efficacy of "qualifying" dependent variables and;<br> * expanded power and sample size tables for multiple regression/correlation.<br>
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.

              Executive functions (EFs)-a set of general-purpose control processes that regulate one's thoughts and behaviors-have become a popular research topic lately and have been studied in many subdisciplines of psychological science. This article summarizes the EF research that our group has conducted to understand the nature of individual differences in EFs and their cognitive and biological underpinnings. In the context of a new theoretical framework that we have been developing (the unity/diversity framework), we describe four general conclusions that have emerged from our research. Specifically, we argue that individual differences in EFs, as measured with simple laboratory tasks, (1) show both unity and diversity (different EFs are correlated yet separable); (2) reflect substantial genetic contributions; (3) are related to various clinically and societally important phenomena; and (4) show some developmental stability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Applied Neuropsychology: Child
                Applied Neuropsychology: Child
                Informa UK Limited
                2162-2965
                2162-2973
                August 31 2021
                : 1-8
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Educational & Counselling Psychology & Special Education, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                [4 ]Departments of Anatomy and Physiology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Missouri, United States
                [5 ]The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                Article
                10.1080/21622965.2021.1967154
                907867de-8f2d-42be-8b54-47fec352ae07
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article