1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perception Regarding Early Clinical Exposure among Second Year Medical Students after Educating Pregnant Women on Physiological Changes during Pregnancy: A Mixed Methods Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Introduction:

          The traditional teaching-learning process should reform to improve the academic performance and understanding of the students. This study aimed to determine the perceptions of second-year medical students towards early clinical exposure about their approach to educating pregnant women on the physiology of pregnancy.

          Methods:

          This was a descriptive cross-sectional study with a mixed-method design comprising both quantitative and qualitative components among second-year medical students of a medical college in Nepal from September 2019 to September 2020. After ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 207), 40 students included through the convenience sampling method. These students were subjected to early clinical exposure in the form of educating pregnant women on physiological changes during pregnancy. Data was entered and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data.

          Results:

          Among 34 responses, majority of the students 29 (85.28%) (73.36-97.20 at 95% Confidence Interval) were motivated to learn the physiology of pregnancy after the activity; 15 (44.11%) strongly agreed and 14 (41.17%) agreed to this statement. Thirty-two students (94.11%) claimed that the activity improved their understanding of the physiology of pregnancy. The majority of the students expressed that this approach is pragmatic which ignited more curiosity regarding the subject matter.

          Conclusions:

          The majority of the students had satisfactory perceptions regarding their early clinical exposure which was similar to standard data and they expressed that they would like to have similar activities in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Where's the evidence that active learning works?

          Calls for reforms in the ways we teach science at all levels, and in all disciplines, are wide spread. The effectiveness of the changes being called for, employment of student-centered, active learning pedagogy, is now well supported by evidence. The relevant data have come from a number of different disciplines that include the learning sciences, cognitive psychology, and educational psychology. There is a growing body of research within specific scientific teaching communities that supports and validates the new approaches to teaching that have been adopted. These data are reviewed, and their applicability to physiology education is discussed. Some of the inherent limitations of research about teaching and learning are also discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Too much teaching, not enough learning: what is the solution?

              The curriculum is packed with so much content that teachers resort to telling students what they know and students simply commit facts to memory. The packed curriculum leaves little time for students to acquire a deep understanding of the subject or to develop life-long skills such as critical thinking, problem solving, and communication. However, learning is not committing a set of facts to memory, but the ability to use resources to find, evaluate, and apply information. This paper addresses these concerns by discussing "how we learn" and reviewing the literature on what works to improve learning. It is clear that active processing of information, not passive reception of information, leads to learning. That is, students must construct their own understanding of concepts, relationships, and procedures. Teachers can encourage this process by carefully considering the type and organization of information as well as instructional strategies. Specifically, teachers should reduce the total amount of factual information students are expected to memorize, reduce our use of the passive lecture format, and devote much more effort to helping students become active, independent learners and problem solvers. Collaborative learning activities, interactive models, educational games, and establishing a culture of inquiry/scholarship are critical for achieving these goals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc
                JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc
                J Nepal Med Assoc
                JNMA
                JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association
                Journal of the Nepal Medical Association
                0028-2715
                1815-672X
                February 2022
                28 February 2022
                : 60
                : 246
                : 171-176
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiology, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences , Kathmandu, Nepal
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacology, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences , Kathmandu, Nepal
                [3 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shree Birendra Hospital , Kathmandu, Nepal
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Dr Bipin Kumar Shrestha, Department of Physiology, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. Email: bipin. shrestha@ 123456naihs.edu.np , Phone: +977-9841201247
                Article
                10.31729/jnma.7289
                9200000
                35210627
                91d4a5ea-164d-4328-8542-ff4ad586625f
                © The Author(s) 2018.

                This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                academic performance,early clinical exposure,perception,physiology of pregnancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article