Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk factors and prevalence of high resistant Acinetobacter spp among hospitalized patients

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, Acinetobacter spp. have emerged as an important cause of Health care Associated Infection in recent years. There are complications in the infection control and treatment of patients who were infected with Acinetobacter spp. because of the extraordinary ability of this bacterium to survive in environment for long periods and its propensity to acquire multiple antibiotic resistance mechanisms.[1] This cross-sectional study was performed for determination prevalence of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp., antibiotic resistance pattern and risk factors associated with acquisition of colonization/infection with extensively drug resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter spp. in the specialty teaching hospital, in Isfahan, Iran. During the 4 month period between October 2011 and Jan 2012, we collected 865 clinical specimens, including different clinical specimens from various wards. Acinetobacter was identified by conventional methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using the disk diffusion method according to Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI-2011) guidelines.[2] A total of 69 Acinetobacter spp. were isolated. A total of 36 patients (52.17%) were female. Most of Acinetobacter spp. were isolated from tracheal tube secretion with 14 (20.3%) positive cultures. In surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility tests, we founded that 60 (86.95%) isolates were XDR, because of their resistance to all of 11 antibiotics [Table 1]. This is comparable with a report from USA that showed 46% of isolates were resistant to all of conventional antibiotics.[3] Totally, 66 isolates (95.65%) were carbapenem-resistant. In the six patients, Acinetobacter was isolated from multiple sites or one site for several times. It should be mentioned that all of six patients were infected or colonized with XDR strains, died during our study. Thus, this presumption exists that in some cases death was related to Acinetobacter infection or infection had accelerated patients’ death rate. Significant risk factors for colonization/infection with XDR-strains were hospitalized duration (P = 0.048), underlying disease (P = 0.016), and corticosteroid usage (P = 0.030). In this study prevalence of Acinetobacter spp. was 7.98% while in Korea was 6.6%.[4] Many investigations reported prevalence of Acinetobacter particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU) ward. Prevalence of Acinetobacter spp. in the ICU ward of a hospital in Tehran was 22.4% and was most frequently isolated organism,[5] while in our study was 71.0%. This discrepancy may be due to several factors such as the condition of patients, management of infection control programs, type of strains and antibiotic resistance pattern of isolates that it is effective in increasing of survival rate of them in the environment and colonization on the body of patients. Table 1 Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Acinetobacter spp With increasing in prevalence of Acinetobacter spp. infections specially XDR-isolates, it is critical utilization of procedures that can reduce emersion and prevalence of XDR-Acinetobacter spp. among hospitalized patients. AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION Dr. Bahram Nasr Esfahani was co-author of study and coordinated preparation of manuscript. Arezoo Pourdad coordinated collection and surveillence of demographic and medical data of patients of study and experimental studies. Mojtaba Akbari performed statistical analysis of data. Tahere Motallebi Rad coordinated design of study and performed clinical and experiments studies and achieved Data of work. Manuscript is written by her. Dr. Hossein Fazeli designed the study and procedures and methods and contributed to editing of manuscript.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a descriptive study in a city hospital

          Background Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, (MRAB) is an important cause of hospital acquired infection. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk factors for MRAB in a city hospital patient population. Methods This study is a retrospective review of a city hospital epidemiology data base and includes 247 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) from 164 patients. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii was defined as resistance to more than three classes of antibiotics. Using the non-MRAB isolates as the control group, the risk factors for the acquisition of MRAB were determined. Results Of the 247 AB isolates 72% (177) were multidrug resistant. Fifty-eight percent (143/247) of isolates were highly resistant (resistant to imipenem, amikacin, and ampicillin-sulbactam). Of the 37 patients who died with Acinetobacter colonization/infection, 32 (86%) patients had the organism recovered from the respiratory tract. The factors which were found to be significantly associated (p ≤ 0.05) with multidrug resistance include the recovery of AB from multiple sites, mechanical ventilation, previous antibiotic exposure, and the presence of neurologic impairment. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter was associated with significant mortality when compared with sensitive strains (p ≤ 0.01). When surgical patients (N = 75) were considered separately, mechanical ventilation and multiple isolates remained the factors significantly associated with the development of multidrug resistant Acinetobacter. Among surgical patients 46/75 (61%) grew a multidrug resistant strain of AB and 37/75 (40%) were resistant to all commonly used antibiotics including aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, carbepenems, extended spectrum penicillins, and quinolones. Thirty-five percent of the surgical patients had AB cultured from multiple sites and 57% of the Acinetobacter isolates were associated with a co-infecting organism, usually a Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas. As in medical patients, the isolation of Acinetobacter from multiple sites and the need for mechanical ventilation were significantly associated with the development of MRAB. Conclusions The factors significantly associated with MRAB in both the general patient population and surgical patients were mechanical ventilation and the recovery of Acinetobacter from multiple anatomic sites. Previous antibiotic use and neurologic impairment were significant factors in medical patients. Colonization or infection with MRAB is associated with increased mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Twenty-First Informational Supplement

            P Wayne (2011)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Further Increases in Carbapenem-, Amikacin-, and Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Isolates of Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa in Korea: KONSAR Study 2009

              Purpose The increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistant bacteria has become a serious worldwide problem. The aim of this study was to analyze antimicrobial resistance data generated in 2009 by hospitals and commercial laboratories participating in the Korean Nationwide Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance program. Materials and Methods Susceptibility data were collected from 24 hospitals and two commercial laboratories. In the analysis, resistance did not include intermediate susceptibility. Duplicate isolates were excluded from the analysis of hospital isolates, but not from the commercial laboratory isolates. Results Among the hospital isolates, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin G-non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae based on meningitis breakpoint, and ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium remained highly prevalent. The proportion of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium gradually increased to 29%. Ceftazidime-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae increased to 17% and 33%, respectively, and fluoroquinolone-resistant K. pneumoniae, Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa increased to 33%, 67% and 39%, respectively. Amikacin-resistant Acinetobacter spp. increased to 48%. Imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa increased to 51% and 26%, respectively. Higher resistance rates were observed in intensive care unit (ICU) isolates than in non-ICU isolates among the isolates from hospitals. Resistance rates were higher in hospital isolates than in clinic isolates among the isolates from commercial laboratories. Conclusion Among the hospital isolates, ceftazidime-resistant K. pneumoniae and fluoroquinolone-resistant K. pneumoniae, Acinetobacter spp., and P. aeruginosa further increased. The increase in imipenem resistance was slight in P. aeruginosa, but drastic in Acinetobacter spp. The problematic antimicrobial-organism combinations were much more prevalent among ICU isolates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Res Med Sci
                J Res Med Sci
                JRMS
                Journal of Research in Medical Sciences : The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                1735-1995
                1735-7136
                May 2014
                : 19
                : 5
                : 480-481
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                [1 ]Department of Infection Control, Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                [2 ]Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Ms. Tahere Motallebi Rad, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. E-mail: tmotalebirad@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                JRMS-19-480
                4116585
                25097636
                9214c669-b26c-4496-b917-d595bef59b09
                Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Letter to Editor

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article