23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Sex and Gender in Neurodegenerative Diseases

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Neurodegenerative Diseases: 3.0 Impact Factor I 4.3 CiteScore I 0.695 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Estimate of Dementia Prevalence in a Community Sample from São Paulo, Brazil

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims: To estimate dementia prevalence and describe the etiology of dementia in a community sample from the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods: A sample of subjects older than 60 years was screened for dementia in the first phase. During the second phase, the diagnostic workup included a structured interview, physical and neurological examination, laboratory exams, a brain scan, and DSM-IV criteria diagnosis. Results: Mean age was 71.5 years (n = 1,563) and 58.3% had up to 4 years of schooling (68.7% female). Dementia was diagnosed in 107 subjects with an observed prevalence of 6.8%. The estimate of dementia prevalence was 12.9%, considering design effect, nonresponse during the community phase, and positive and negative predictive values. Alzheimer’s disease was the most frequent cause of dementia (59.8%), followed by vascular dementia (15.9%). Older age and illiteracy were significantly associated with dementia. Conclusions: The estimate of dementia prevalence was higher than previously reported in Brazil, with Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia being the most frequent causes of dementia. Dementia prevalence in Brazil and in other Latin American countries should be addressed by additional studies to confirm these higher dementia rates which might have a sizable impact on countries’ health services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Relation of education and occupation-based socioeconomic status to incident Alzheimer's disease.

          In this study, the authors evaluated whether the association between low educational level and increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia may be explained by occupation-based socioeconomic status (SES). A cohort of 931 nondemented subjects aged > or = 75 years from the Kungsholmen Project, Stockholm, Sweden, was followed for 3 years between 1987 and 1993. A total of 101 incident cases of dementia, 76 involving AD, were detected. Less-educated subjects had an adjusted relative risk of developing AD of 3.4 (95% confidence interval: 2.0, 6.0), and subjects with lower SES had an adjusted relative risk of 1.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.0, 2.5). When both education and SES were introduced into the same model, only education remained significantly associated with AD. Combinations of low education with low or high SES were associated with similar increased risks of AD, but well-educated subjects with low SES were not at high risk. Low SES at 20 years of age, even when SES was high at age 40 or 60 years, was associated with increased risk; however, this increase disappeared when education was entered into the model. In conclusion, the association between low education and increased AD risk was not mediated by adult SES or socioeconomic mobility. This suggests that early life factors may be relevant.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiologic Survey of Dementia in a Community-Dwelling Brazilian Population

            The authors report the prevalence of dementia in a community-dwelling Brazilian elderly population and correlate prevalence data with educational and socioeconomic levels. The study was conducted in Catanduva, Brazil. A total of 1,656 randomly selected subjects aged 65 years or more were submitted to a health questionnaire, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (PFAQ). According to the PFAQ and MMSE scores, selected subjects were submitted to clinical, neurologic, and cognitive evaluations. The subjects diagnosed with dementia underwent laboratory tests and brain computed tomography (CT). Dementia was diagnosed in 118 subjects, corresponding to a prevalence of 7.1%. The main clinical diagnoses were Alzheimer disease (AD; 55.1%), vascular dementia (9.3%), and AD with cerebrovascular disease (14.4%). The prevalence increased with age and was higher in women. There was an inverse association with education (3.5% among persons with 8 or more years of schooling to 12.2% among those who were illiterate). Multivariate analysis disclosed significant association between these three variables and dementia. The prevalence of dementia in this Brazilian population was 7.1%, and AD was the most frequent diagnosis. Age, female gender, and low educational level were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of dementia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Education and Dementia: A Meta-Analytic Study

              Considerable controversy exists about the role of education in the risk of dementia. Individual studies have not been conclusive so far. To examine the hypothesis that lower education is associated with a higher risk of dementia, we carried out a meta-analysis. Observational studies published as of October 2005 that examined the association between education and risk of dementia were systematically reviewed. Relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios were extracted from cohort and case-control studies. We first compared the risk of dementia in subjects with high level of education with the risk of dementia in those with low educational level. In a subsequent analysis, we compared the risk of persons with high education with the risk of subjects with education level other than high (medium, low). We weighted log RRs for cohort studies or odds ratios by the inverse of their variances. Nineteen studies were included in our meta-analysis (13 cohort and 6 case-control studies). RRs for low versus high education level were: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) 1.80 (95% CI: 1.43–2.27); non-AD dementias, 1.32 (95% CI: 0.92–1.88), and all dementias 1.59 (95% CI: 1.26–2.01). For low and medium versus high education level, the RRs were: AD 1.44 (95% CI: 1.24–1.67); non-AD 1.23 (95% CI: 0.94–1.61), and all dementias 1.33 (95% CI: 1.15–1.54). These results confirm that low education may be a risk factor for dementia, especially for AD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DEM
                Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord
                10.1159/issn.1420-8008
                Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
                S. Karger AG
                1420-8008
                1421-9824
                2008
                October 2008
                09 October 2008
                : 26
                : 4
                : 291-299
                Affiliations
                aOld Age Research Group (PROTER), Institute and Department of Psychiatry, and bDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                Article
                161053 Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008;26:291–299
                10.1159/000161053
                18843181
                922a45f0-441e-47c5-982a-c484413f770c
                © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 16 June 2008
                Page count
                Tables: 5, References: 44, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Original Research Article

                Geriatric medicine,Neurology,Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurosciences,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
                Alzheimer’s disease,Dementia prevalence,Risk factors,Vascular dementia

                Comments

                Comment on this article