7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The promising efficacy of a risk-based letermovir use strategy in CMV-positive allogeneic hematopoietic cell recipients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • The risk-based letermovir use strategy is effective for CMV infection prophylaxis and allows some patients at low risk not to use letermovir.

          • Among patients at low risk without letermovir, most had negative or transient positive CMV DNA without clinically significant CMV infection.

          Visual Abstract

          Abstract

          Letermovir is the first approved drug for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection prophylaxis in adult patients who are CMV positive undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Because CMV infection risk varies from patient to patient, we evaluated whether a risk-based strategy could be effective. In this single-center study, all consecutive adult patients who were CMV positive and underwent allo-HCT between 2015 and 2021 were included. During period 1 (2015-2017), letermovir was not used, whereas during period 2 (2018-2021), letermovir was used in patients at high risk but not in patients at low risk, except in those receiving corticosteroids. In patients at high risk, the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) in period 2 was lower than that in period 1 ( P < .001) by week 14 (10.5% vs 51.6%) and week 24 (16.9% vs 52.7%). In patients at low risk, although only 28.6% of patients received letermovir in period 2, csCMVi incidence was also significantly lower ( P = .003) by week 14 (7.9% vs 29.0%) and week 24 (11.2% vs 33.3%). Among patients at low risk who did not receive letermovir (n = 45), 23 patients (51.1%) experienced transient positive CMV DNA without csCMVi, whereas 17 patients (37.8%) experienced negative results. In both risk groups, the 2 periods were comparable for CMV disease, overall survival, progression-free survival, relapse, and nonrelapse mortality. We concluded that a risk-based strategy for letermovir use is an effective strategy which maintains the high efficacy of letermovir in patients at high risk but allows some patients at low risk to not use letermovir.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation.

          Despite recent advances, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications affecting solid organ transplant recipients, conveying higher risks of complications, graft loss, morbidity, and mortality. Research in the field and development of prior consensus guidelines supported by The Transplantation Society has allowed a more standardized approach to CMV management. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to expand and revise evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management including prevention, treatment, diagnostics, immunology, drug resistance, and pediatric issues. Highlights include advances in molecular and immunologic diagnostics, improved understanding of diagnostic thresholds, optimized methods of prevention, advances in the use of novel antiviral therapies and certain immunosuppressive agents, and more savvy approaches to treatment resistant/refractory disease. The following report summarizes the updated recommendations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Letermovir Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus in Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Definitions of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Patients for Use in Clinical Trials.

              Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are important causes of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. For the purpose of developing consistent reporting of CMV outcomes in clinical trials, definitions of CMV infection and disease were developed and most recently published in 2002. Since then, there have been major developments in its diagnosis and management. Therefore, the CMV Drug Development Forum consisting of scientists, clinicians, regulators, and industry representatives has produced an updated version incorporating recent knowledge with the aim to support clinical research and drug development. The main changes compared to previous definitions are the introduction of a "probable disease" category and to incorporate quantitative nucleic acid testing in some end-organ disease categories. As the field evolves, the need for updates of these definitions is clear, and collaborative efforts between scientists, regulators, and industry can provide a platform for this work.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Blood Adv
                Blood Adv
                Blood Advances
                The American Society of Hematology
                2473-9529
                2473-9537
                11 November 2022
                14 March 2023
                11 November 2022
                : 7
                : 5
                : 856-865
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Infectious Disease, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
                [2 ]U1019-UMR 9017-Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, INSERM, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Pasteur de Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
                [3 ]Department of Biostatistics, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de Santé et des Pratiques Médicales, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
                [4 ]Hematology Department, CHU Lille, Lille, France
                [5 ]Infinite U1286, INSERM, University of Lille, Lille, France
                [6 ]Infectious Disease Department, Gustave Dron Hospital, Tourcoing, France
                [7 ]Virology Laboratory, ULR 3610, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
                [8 ]ULR 7365 – GRITA – Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
                Author notes
                []Correspondence: David Beauvais, UAM allogreffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques, CHU Lille, 2 avenue Oscar Lambret, F-59037 Lille Cedex, France; david.beauvais@ 123456chru-lille.fr
                Article
                S2473-9529(22)00736-4
                10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008667
                9986711
                36350752
                934f613f-f5f6-4cd1-916a-5b60279381f8
                © 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 July 2022
                : 25 October 2022
                Categories
                Transplantation

                Comments

                Comment on this article