2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors Associated With Opioid Overdose After an Initial Opioid Prescription

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cohort study investigates patient- and prescription-related factors associated with opioid-related fatal or nonfatal overdose among opioid-naive individuals receiving an initial opioid prescription.

          Key Points

          Question

          What factors are associated with an increased risk for opioid overdose after the initial opioid prescription to a previously opioid-naive individual?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 236 921 individuals who received a first opioid prescription, 667 experienced an incident opioid overdose. Patient risk factors included being aged 75 years or older, being male, receiving Medicaid or Medicare Advantage coverage, having a comorbid substance use disorder or depression, and having medical comorbidities. Prescription-related risk factors included an initial prescription of oxycodone or tramadol, concurrent use of benzodiazepines, and filling opioid prescriptions from 3 or more pharmacies.

          Meaning

          Findings from this study suggest that several patient- and prescription-related risk factors are associated with opioid overdose; prescribers, researchers, policy makers, and insurers can apply this information to guide opioid counseling and monitoring, develop clinical decision-making tools, and provide additional opioid prevention and treatment resources to individuals who are at greatest risk for opioid overdose.

          Abstract

          Importance

          The opioid epidemic continues to be a public health crisis in the US.

          Objective

          To assess the patient factors and early time-varying prescription-related factors associated with opioid-related fatal or nonfatal overdose.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cohort study evaluated opioid-naive adult patients in Oregon using data from the Oregon Comprehensive Opioid Risk Registry, which links all payer claims data to other health data sets in the state of Oregon. The observational, population-based sample filled a first (index) opioid prescription in 2015 and was followed up until December 31, 2018. Data analyses were performed from March 1, 2020, to June 15, 2021.

          Exposures

          Overdose after the index opioid prescription.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The outcome was an overdose event. The sample was followed up to identify fatal or nonfatal opioid overdoses. Patient and prescription characteristics were identified. Prescription characteristics in the first 6 months after the index prescription were modeled as cumulative, time-dependent measures that were updated monthly through the sixth month of follow-up. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess patient and prescription characteristics that were associated with an increased risk for overdose events.

          Results

          The cohort comprised 236 921 patients (133 839 women [56.5%]), of whom 667 (0.3%) experienced opioid overdose. Risk of overdose was highest among individuals 75 years or older (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.22; 95% CI, 1.94-5.36) compared with those aged 35 to 44 years; men (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.10-1.51); those who were dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare Advantage (aHR, 4.37; 95% CI, 3.09-6.18), had Medicaid (aHR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.97-4.80), or had Medicare Advantage (aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.44-3.31) compared with those with commercial insurance; those with comorbid substance use disorder (aHR, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.15-3.50), with depression (aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.55), or with 1 to 2 comorbidities (aHR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.62) or 3 or more comorbidities (aHR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.42-2.53) compared with none. Patients were at an increased overdose risk if they filled oxycodone (aHR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.04-2.77) or tramadol (aHR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.34-5.84) compared with codeine; used benzodiazepines (aHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11); used concurrent opioids and benzodiazepines (aHR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.70-2.62); or filled opioids from 3 or more pharmacies over 6 months (aHR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.75).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This cohort study used a comprehensive data set to identify patient and prescription-related risk factors that were associated with opioid overdose. These findings may guide opioid counseling and monitoring, the development of clinical decision-making tools, and opioid prevention and treatment resources for individuals who are at greatest risk for opioid overdose.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

          Implementation of the International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) coding system presents challenges for using administrative data. Recognizing this, we conducted a multistep process to develop ICD-10 coding algorithms to define Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in administrative data and assess the performance of the resulting algorithms. ICD-10 coding algorithms were developed by "translation" of the ICD-9-CM codes constituting Deyo's (for Charlson comorbidities) and Elixhauser's coding algorithms and by physicians' assessment of the face-validity of selected ICD-10 codes. The process of carefully developing ICD-10 algorithms also produced modified and enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithms for the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities. We then used data on in-patients aged 18 years and older in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative hospital discharge data from a Canadian health region to assess the comorbidity frequencies and mortality prediction achieved by the original ICD-9-CM algorithms, the enhanced ICD-9-CM algorithms, and the new ICD-10 coding algorithms. Among 56,585 patients in the ICD-9-CM data and 58,805 patients in the ICD-10 data, frequencies of the 17 Charlson comorbidities and the 30 Elixhauser comorbidities remained generally similar across algorithms. The new ICD-10 and enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithms either matched or outperformed the original Deyo and Elixhauser ICD-9-CM coding algorithms in predicting in-hospital mortality. The C-statistic was 0.842 for Deyo's ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.860 for the ICD-10 coding algorithm, and 0.859 for the enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.868 for the original Elixhauser ICD-9-CM coding algorithm, 0.870 for the ICD-10 coding algorithm and 0.878 for the enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithm. These newly developed ICD-10 and ICD-9-CM comorbidity coding algorithms produce similar estimates of comorbidity prevalence in administrative data, and may outperform existing ICD-9-CM coding algorithms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016.

            Primary care clinicians find managing chronic pain challenging. Evidence of long-term efficacy of opioids for chronic pain is limited. Opioid use is associated with serious risks, including opioid use disorder and overdose.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                28 January 2022
                January 2022
                28 January 2022
                : 5
                : 1
                : e2145691
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Division of Research and Evaluation, Comagine Health, Portland, Oregon
                [3 ]School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
                [4 ]Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                [5 ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [6 ]McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts
                [7 ]Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
                [8 ]OCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: December 3, 2021.
                Published: January 28, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45691
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Weiner SG et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Scott G. Weiner, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, NH-226, Boston, MA 02215 ( sweiner@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr El Ibrahimi had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Weiner, El Ibrahimi, Hallvik, Boyer, Kreiner, Wright.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Weiner, El Ibrahimi, Hendricks, Hallvik, Hildebran, Fischer, Weiss, Boyer, Wright, Flores, Ritter.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Weiner, El Ibrahimi, Hendricks, Weiss, Boyer, Flores.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: El Ibrahimi, Hendricks, Hallvik, Hildebran, Fischer, Weiss, Boyer, Kreiner, Wright, Ritter.
                Statistical analysis: Weiner, El Ibrahimi, Hendricks, Wright, Ritter.
                Obtained funding: Weiner.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Weiner, Hendricks, Hildebran, Kreiner, Wright, Flores.
                Supervision: Weiner, Hendricks, Hallvik, Hildebran, Boyer.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Weiss reported receiving personal fees from Analgesic Solutions outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was funded by grant 5-R01-DA044167 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: We thank Benjamin Chan, MS; Laura Chisolm, PhD; Peter Geissert, MS, MPH; Dancia Hall; Craig New, PhD; Steven Ranzoni, MPH; and Josh Van Otterloo, MSPH, at the Oregon Health Authority for their ongoing partnership, support, and insight. These individuals received no additional compensation, outside of their usual salary, for their contributions.
                Article
                zoi211261
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45691
                8800077
                35089351
                936fb269-a00e-40e3-b687-1168aa0f1448
                Copyright 2022 Weiner SG et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 13 July 2021
                : 3 December 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Substance Use and Addiction

                Comments

                Comment on this article