12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measuring multimorbidity beyond counting diseases: systematic review of community and population studies and guide to index choice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To identify and summarise existing indices for measuring multimorbidity beyond disease counts, to establish which indices include mental health comorbidities or outcomes, and to develop recommendations based on applicability, performance, and usage.

          Design

          Systematic review.

          Data sources

          Seven medical research databases (Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus) from inception to October 2018 and bibliographies and citations of relevant papers. Searches were limited to English language publications.

          Eligibility criteria for study selection

          Original articles describing a new multimorbidity index including more information than disease counts and not focusing on comorbidity associated with one specific disease. Studies were of adults based in the community or at population level.

          Results

          Among 7128 search results, 5560 unique titles were identified. After screening against eligibility criteria the review finally included 35 papers. As index components, 25 indices used conditions (weighted or in combination with other parameters), five used diagnostic categories, four used drug use, and one used physiological measures. Predicted outcomes included mortality (18 indices), healthcare use or costs (13), hospital admission (13), and health related quality of life (7). 29 indices considered some aspect of mental health, with most including it as a comorbidity. 12 indices are recommended for use.

          Conclusions

          35 multimorbidity indices are available, with differing components and outcomes. Researchers and clinicians should examine existing indices for suitability before creating new ones.

          Systematic review registration

          PROSPERO CRD42017074211.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research.

          To develop the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ) and assess its psychometric properties, including the predictive validity of the instrument, as reflected by its association with health status and health care utilization after 1 year. A cross-sectional comparison of the SCQ with a standard, chart abstraction-based measure (Charlson Index) was conducted on 170 inpatients from medical and surgical care units. The association of the SCQ with the chart-based comorbidity instrument and health status (short form 36) was evaluated cross sectionally. The association between these measures and health status and resource utilization was assessed after 1 year. The Spearman correlation coefficient for the association between the SCQ and the Charlson Index was 0.32. After restricting each measure to include only comparable items, the correlation between measures was stronger (Spearman r = 0.55). The SCQ had modest associations with measures of resource utilization during the index admission, and with health status and resource utilization after 1 year. The SCQ has modest correlations with a widely used medical record-based comorbidity instrument, and with subsequent health status and utilization. This new measure represents an efficient method to assess comorbid conditions in clinical and health services research. It will be particularly useful in settings where medical records are unavailable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cumulative illness rating scale.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews

              Multimorbidity, the coexistence of multiple health conditions, is a growing public health challenge. Research and intervention development are hampered by the lack of consensus regarding defining and measuring multimorbidity. The aim of this systematic review was to pool the findings of systematic reviews examining definitions and measures of multimorbidity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: honorary clinical research fellow in old age psychiatry
                Role: locum consultant in general adult psychiatry
                Role: honorary clinical volunteer lecturer in psychiatry
                Role: professor of psychiatry of ageing
                Role: senior lecturer in biostatistics and epidemiology
                Role: consultant old age psychiatrist
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-UK
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2020
                18 February 2020
                : 368
                : m160
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Edinburgh Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Kennedy Tower, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF, UK
                [2 ]Division of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
                [3 ]NHS Lothian, St John’s Hospital, Howden, Livingston, UK
                [4 ]University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
                [5 ]Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
                [6 ]NHS Lothian, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: L E Stirland l.stirland@ 123456ed.ac.uk (or @stirlandia on Twitter)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5678-4583
                Article
                stil050415
                10.1136/bmj.m160
                7190061
                32071114
                939ad986-130c-4739-92bd-1477c20e2c60
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 December 2019
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article