1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Chemotherapy-Induced Pseudocellulitis Without Prior Radiation Exposure : A Systematic Review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Chemotherapy-induced pseudocellulitis is an ill-defined term for a poorly understood phenomenon. Encompassing a myriad of cellulitis-mimicking oncologic adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDRs), pseudocellulitis may be difficult to diagnosis, and the lack of treatment guidance may mean unnecessary antibiotic exposure and interruptions to oncologic care.

          Objectives

          To use case reports to characterize the various cellulitis-mimicking reactions caused by chemotherapeutic medications, to understand how these reactions affect patient care (ie, antibiotic exposure and interruptions to oncologic treatment), and to make recommendations for improved diagnosis and care of patients with chemotherapy-induced pseudocellulitis.

          Evidence Review

          A systematic review of case reports of patients with pseudocellulitis was performed. Reports were identified through database searches using PubMed and Embase, with subsequent reference searches. Included publications described at least 1 case of chemotherapy-induced ACDR and used the term pseudocellulitis or showed evidence of cellulitis mimicry. Cases of radiation recall dermatitis were excluded. Data were extracted from a total of 32 publications representing 81 patients diagnosed with pseudocellulitis.

          Findings

          Of the 81 cases (median [range] age, 67 [36-80] years; 44 [54%] male patients), most were associated with gemcitabine use; pemetrexed use was reported less frequently. Only 39 were considered to be true chemotherapy-induced pseudocellulitis. These cases resembled infectious cellulitis and did not meet diagnostic criteria for any known diagnoses; therefore, these were described solely as pseudocellulitis. Of this group, 26 patients (67%) had been administered antibiotics before the correct diagnosis was made, and 14 patients (36%) experienced interruptions to their oncologic treatment plans.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This systematic review found a variety of chemotherapy-induced ACDRs that mimic infectious cellulitis, including a group of reactions termed pseudocellulitis that do not meet criteria for other diagnoses. A more universally accepted definition and clinical research on chemotherapy-induced pseudocellulitis would allow for more accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, antibiotic stewardship, and continuation of oncologic treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcomes of Early Dermatology Consultation for Inpatients Diagnosed With Cellulitis

            Question What are the clinical and economic implications of early dermatology consultation for patients with presumed cellulitis? Findings This cohort study found that early dermatology consultation for presumed cellulitis decreased rates of unnecessary antibiotic use by 74.4% and unnecessary hospitalizations by 85.0% in patients with pseudocellulitis. Nationally, dermatology-led screening could eliminate 97 000 to 256 000 unnecessary hospitalization days, protect between 34 000 and 91 000 patients from unnecessary antibiotic exposure, and save $80 million to $210 million annually. Meaning Early dermatology consultation for presumed cellulitis represents an economical intervention that reduces hospitalization length and antibiotic use for patients with pseudocellulitis. This cohort study examines the effects of dermatology consultation on misdiagnosis of cellulitis in patients admitted to emergency departments. Importance Many inflammatory skin dermatoses mimic cellulitis (pseudocellulitis) and are treated with antibiotics and/or hospitalization, leading to unnecessary patient morbidity and substantial health care spending. Objective To evaluate the impact of early dermatology consultation on clinical and economic outcomes associated with misdiagnosed cellulitis. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with presumed diagnosis of cellulitis in the emergency department, in the emergency department observation unit, or within 24 hours of admission to an inpatient unit of a large urban teaching hospital between February and September 2017. Patients were provided with telephone and clinic follow-up during the 30-day postdischarge period. We screened 165 patients with the primary concern of cellulitis. Of these, we excluded 44 who required antibiotics for cutaneous, soft-tissue, and deeper-tissue and/or bone infections irrespective of cellulitis status, and 5 who were scheduled to be discharged by the emergency department. Interventions Early dermatology consultation for presumed cellulitis. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were patient disposition and rates of antibiotic use. Results Of 116 patients (63 [54.3%] women; 91 [78.4%] non-Hispanic white; mean [SD] age, 58.4 [19.1] years), 39 (33.6%) were diagnosed with pseudocellulitis by dermatologists. Of these, 34 (87.2%) had started using antibiotics for presumed cellulitis as prescribed by the primary team at the time of enrollment. The dermatology team recommended antibiotic discontinuation in 28 of 34 patients (82.4%), and antibiotics were stopped in 26 of 28 cases (92.9%). The dermatologists also recommended discharge from planned observation or inpatient admission in 20 of 39 patients with pseudocellulitis (51.3%), and the primary team acted on this recommendation in 17 of 20 cases (85.0%). No patients diagnosed with pseudocellulitis experienced worsening condition after discharge based on phone and clinic follow-up (30 of 39 [76.9%] follow-up rate). Extrapolating the impact of dermatology consultation for presumed cellulitis nationally, we estimate 97 000 to 256 000 avoided hospitalization days, 34 000 to 91 000 patients avoiding unnecessary antibiotic exposure, and $80 million to $210 million in net cost savings annually. Conclusions and Relevance Early consultation by dermatologists for patients with presumed cellulitis represents a cost-effective intervention to improve health-related outcomes through the reduction of inappropriate antibiotic use and hospitalization.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lower limb cellulitis and its mimics: part I. Lower limb cellulitis.

              An aging population and obesity have both contributed to a rising incidence of lower limb cellulitis; the most important predisposing factors include older age, obesity, venous insufficiency, saphenous venectomy, and edema. Streptococci are the most commonly implicated pathogen, and often reside in the interdigital toes spaces. Any disruption of the skin surface can allow the organism to invade. Effective management requires an appropriate antibiotic and attention to the predisposing factors. This article summarizes the epidemiology and treatment of this common infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Dermatology
                JAMA Dermatol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6068
                June 28 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
                [2 ]Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
                Article
                10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1735
                9473f848-5547-4d5c-ae04-8f40a197da45
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article