8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sedation versus protective stabilization for dental treatment of children with caries and challenging behavior at the dentist (CHOOSE): a study protocol for a non-randomized clinical trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of moderate sedation in pediatric dentistry, compared to protective stabilization, which remains routinely used in Brazil despite moral questions. This prospective non-randomized clinical trial's objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of moderate sedation, compared to the protective stabilization, in the dental care of children with dental behavior management problems.

          Methods

          Participants will be 152 children under seven years of age with early childhood caries (ECC) who need specialized dental treatment due to a history of challenging behavior during dental care. The interventions to be compared are moderate sedation with oral administration of ketamine and midazolam and protective stabilization. The primary endpoint will be the child's behavior during treatment assessed using the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS). The secondary outcomes are (A) child's – behavior according to the visual analogue scale, anxiety, pain, and physiological stress; (B) parent's – satisfaction and anxiety; (C) family and child – impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL); (D) dentist's – satisfaction and stress; (E) procedure – adverse events of the intervention and dental treatment longevity. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).

          Discussion

          Considering the primary outcome, this study hypothesis is that sedated children have better behavior during dental treatment than children whose behavior was managed by protective stabilization without sedation. Additionally, at the end of 12 months, we expect to identify participants' reported outcomes and objective measures related to dental behavior in early childhood.

          Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT04119180 on October 8th, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04119180

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-021-01594-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study.

          It has been suggested that the size of the base of the tongue is an important factor determining the degree of difficulty of direct laryngoscopy. A relatively simple grading system which involves preoperative ability to visualize the faucial pillars, soft palate and base of uvula was designed as a means of predicting the degree of difficulty in laryngeal exposure. The system was evaluated in 210 patients. The degree of difficulty in visualizing these three structures was an accurate predictor of difficulty with direct laryngoscopy (p less than 0.001).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dental fear/anxiety among children and adolescents. A systematic review.

            The aim of this paper was to review the published scientific literature to quantify the prevalence and mean score of dental fear/anxiety (DFA) in children/adolescents and its variation according to several variables.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety

              Background Fast-acting medications for the management of anxiety are important to patients and society. Measuring early onset, however, requires a sensitive and clinically responsive tool. This study evaluates the psychometric properties of a patient-reported Global Anxiety - Visual Analog Scale (GA-VAS). Methods Data from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of lorazepam and paroxetine in patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder were analyzed to assess the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and utility of the GA-VAS. The GA-VAS was completed at clinic visits and at home during the first week of treatment. Targeted psychometric analyses—test-retest reliabilities, validity correlations, responsiveness statistics, and minimum important differences—were conducted. Results The GA-VAS correlates well with other anxiety measures, at Week 4, r = 0.60 (p < 0.0001) with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety and r = 0.74 (p < 0.0001) with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety subscale. In terms of convergent and divergent validity, the GA-VAS correlated -0.54 (p < 0.0001), -0.48 (p < 0.0001), and -0.68 (p < 0.0001) with the SF-36 Emotional Role, Social Function, and Mental Health subscales, respectively, but correlated much lower with the SF-36 physical functioning subscales. Preliminary minimum important difference estimates cluster between 10 and 15 mm. Conclusions The GA-VAS is capable of validly and effectively capturing a reduction in anxiety as quickly as 24 hours post-dose.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gabi.seabra@usp.br
                anna_anabuki@discente.ufg.br
                karollineav@gmail.com
                patriciacorreafaria@ufg.br
                monicamoterane@discente.ufg.br
                tamara.tedesco@ibirapuera.edu.br
                paulosucasas@ufg.br
                m.t.hosey@kcl.ac.uk
                danielar@usp.br
                lsucasas@ufg.br
                Journal
                BMC Oral Health
                BMC Oral Health
                BMC Oral Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6831
                12 May 2021
                12 May 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 256
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.11899.38, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0722, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, , University of São Paulo, ; São Paulo, Brazil
                [2 ]GRID grid.411195.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2192 5801, Dentistry Graduate Program, , Universidade Federal de Goias, ; Goiânia, GO Brazil
                [3 ]GRID grid.411493.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0386 9457, Graduate Program in Dentistry, , Ibirapuera University, ; São Paulo, Brazil
                [4 ]GRID grid.411195.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2192 5801, Faculty of Medicine, , Universidade Federal de Goias, ; Goiânia, GO Brazil
                [5 ]GRID grid.13097.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, Pediatric Dentistry, Centre for Oral Clinical and Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, , King’s College London, ; London, UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.411195.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2192 5801, Faculty of Dentistry, , Universidade Federal de Goias, ; Primeira Avenida, s/n, Goiânia, GO CEP 74605-220 Brazil
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7637-0049
                Article
                1594
                10.1186/s12903-021-01594-0
                8115863
                33980232
                9485dacd-254c-4978-9997-ebc571afce68
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 22 April 2021
                : 26 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003593, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico;
                Award ID: 424339/2018-8
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Dentistry
                dental anxiety,dental care for children,dental caries,conscious sedation,physical restraint,child behavior,cost-effectiveness analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article