6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Hospital-acquired infections. II. Infection rates by site, service and common procedures in a university hospital.

      American Journal of Epidemiology
      Anesthesia, Cross Infection, epidemiology, Hospital Units, Humans, Intermittent Positive-Pressure Breathing, Pneumonia, Respiration, Artificial, Sepsis, Surgical Wound Infection, Urinary Catheterization, Urinary Tract Infections, Virginia

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over a three-year period, 3432 nosocomial infections occurred in a university hospital admitting 55,476 patients over a three-year period (6/100 admissions). A single system of surveillance was used, and overall monthly rates varied from 4-9/100 admissions with particularly high rates in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit (24/100). Annual rates greater than or equal to 10/100 admissions were found in major surgical services of Gneral Surgery, Neuro-Surgery, Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery (TCV), Plastic Surgery and Urology; 1243 urinary tract infections (2.24/100 admissions/ accounted for 36% of the problem. The rate of urinary tract infections after catheterization was 13/100 procedures overall with unusually high rates for patients in Neuro-Surgery (37/100), Orthopedics (23/100), and Plastic Srugery (18/100). There were 524 nosocomial pneumonias (.94/100 admissions), and the rate was especially high (3.7/100) for patients admitted to the TCV service or for those placed on a respirator (3.4/100 patients). Identifying high risk areas and high risk procedures in a hospital is a practical starting point for infection control.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article