4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Assessing Reliable and Clinically Significant Change on Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: Method for Displaying Longitudinal Data

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Calculating clinically significant change in postnatal depression studies using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

              Statistical significance between test scores can sometimes be obtained even when the actual difference between the scores is very small. Because of this researchers have recommended that clinical significance also be calculated when reporting results of interventions. The calculation of clinical significance between scores on a particular test takes into account the reliability of the test, as well as normative data from clinical and non-clinical samples. Jacobson and Truax (1991) describe the calculation of the Reliable Change Index (RCI) as a method of calculating this clinical significance. The RCI for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is calculated to be four points. This is the size of difference between two scores which is needed for a clinician to be 95% confident that this change reflects a real change in the individual's mood, and is not likely to be due to measurement error. Using the accepted EPDS cut-off score of 12/13 for major depression (English-speaking women), examples are given of the clinical significance classification of individual's pre-post EPDS scores. A further example of reporting both statistical significance and clinical significance on the EPDS scores of 23 women is given, highlighting the improved information that is obtained when this clinical significance is calculated. Statistical significance allows the interpretation of whether women 'on average' improve more in one condition than another. Clinical significance allows the further interpretation of how many women show improvement in each condition. This improvement can be categorised into those who recover, those who improve but are still in the distressed range, those who show no reliable change in their EPDS score, and those who deteriorate. Calculating clinical significance, using the reliable change index and cut-off classification, therefore adds to our understanding of the impact of postnatal depression treatment studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
                Aust N Z J Psychiatry
                Informa UK Limited
                0004-8674
                1440-1614
                June 26 2016
                August 2005
                June 26 2016
                August 2005
                : 39
                : 8
                : 719-724
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unit of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, ‘Mario Negri’ Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Eritrea 62, 20157, Milan, Italy
                [2 ]Dipartimento di Salute Mentale, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy
                [3 ]Servizio Psichiatrico di Diagnosi e Cura, Ospedale di Desio, Milan, Italy
                Article
                10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01656.x
                16050926
                94d340ed-6515-446b-85fb-f8995a6fe274
                © 2005

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article