30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improved Genome Editing Efficiency and Flexibility Using Modified Oligonucleotides with TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 Nucleases.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Genome editing has now been reported in many systems using TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases. Precise mutations can be introduced during homology-directed repair with donor DNA carrying the wanted sequence edit, but efficiency is usually lower than for gene knockout and optimal strategies have not been extensively investigated. Here, we show that using phosphorothioate-modified oligonucleotides strongly enhances genome editing efficiency of single-stranded oligonucleotide donors in cultured cells. In addition, it provides better design flexibility, allowing insertions more than 100 bp long. Despite previous reports of phosphorothioate-modified oligonucleotide toxicity, clones of edited cells are readily isolated and targeted sequence insertions are achieved in rats and mice with very high frequency, allowing for homozygous loxP site insertion at the mouse ROSA locus in particular. Finally, when detected, imprecise knockin events exhibit indels that are asymmetrically positioned, consistent with genome editing taking place by two steps of single-strand annealing.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cell Rep
          Cell reports
          2211-1247
          Mar 8 2016
          : 14
          : 9
          Affiliations
          [1 ] INSERM U1154, CNRS UMR7196, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 75005, France.
          [2 ] INSERM U1064, CHU de Nantes, Nantes 44093, France; Platform Rat Transgenesis Immunophenomic, CNRS UMS3556, Nantes 44093, France.
          [3 ] Amagen, CNRS UMS 3504, INRA UMS 1374, Institut de Neurobiologie A. Fessard, Gif-sur-Yvette 91198, France.
          [4 ] genOway, Lyon 69007, France.
          [5 ] INSERM U1154, CNRS UMR7196, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 75005, France. Electronic address: jpconcordet@mnhn.fr.
          [6 ] INSERM U1154, CNRS UMR7196, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 75005, France. Electronic address: carine.giovannangeli@mnhn.fr.
          Article
          S2211-1247(16)30104-8
          10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.018
          26923600
          96442ab2-3e8f-452c-b3f1-fe4c261403d3
          Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article