6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Modularity in the trilobite head consistent with the hypothesized segmental origin of the eyes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The trilobite head served multiple functions and was composed of several fused segments. Yet, the underlying organization of the trilobite head, and whether patterns are conserved across trilobites, remains unclear. Modeling the head as being composed of modules, or subunits that vary and thus have the potential to evolve semi‐independently can reveal underlying patterns of organization. Hypotheses of modular organization based on the comparative developmental biology of arthropods were evaluated using geometric morphometrics. Two‐dimensional (semi)landmark datasets collected from the cranidia of two Ordovician trilobite species, Calyptaulax annulata (Phacopida) and Cloacaspis senilis (Olenida sensu Adrain, 2011) were analyzed. The degree and pattern of modularity were assessed using the covariance ratio (CR), which compares the covariation within putative modules to the covariation between them, and the fit of different models was compared using an effect size measure derived from the CR. When treating the eyes as a distinct module, the best modular hypothesis identified for C. annulata shows the eyes and anteriormost region of the head integrated as a single module. The best modular hypotheses for C. senilis are more complex but the eyes still covary mostly strongly with the anterior part of the head. The latter is also the case for all other well‐supported models for both species. These results can be interpreted as a developmental signal corresponding to the anteriormost ocular segment of early arthropods that is retained throughout development, despite any likely selective pressures related to functional needs.

          Abstract

          The degree and structure of modularity in the heads of two trilobite species, Calyptaulax annulata (left) and Cloacaspis senilis (right) are identified. Best fit hypotheses of modularity are consistent for both species: the eyes and anterior head highly covary (red), consistent with the anteriormost ocular segment of early arthropods. The pattern of modularity represents a developmental signal that remained detectable into adulthood.

          Research highlights

          • Degree and structure of modularity are identified in two trilobite species.

          • In both species, the eyes and anteriormost head highly covary.

          • Interpreted as a developmental signal corresponding to the ocular segment of early arthropods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          R: A language and environmentfor statistical computing

          (2021)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY.

            The problem of complex adaptations is studied in two largely disconnected research traditions: evolutionary biology and evolutionary computer science. This paper summarizes the results from both areas and compares their implications. In evolutionary computer science it was found that the Darwinian process of mutation, recombination and selection is not universally effective in improving complex systems like computer programs or chip designs. For adaptation to occur, these systems must possess "evolvability," i.e., the ability of random variations to sometimes produce improvement. It was found that evolvability critically depends on the way genetic variation maps onto phenotypic variation, an issue known as the representation problem. The genotype-phenotype map determines the variability of characters, which is the propensity to vary. Variability needs to be distinguished from variations, which are the actually realized differences between individuals. The genotype-phenotype map is the common theme underlying such varied biological phenomena as genetic canalization, developmental constraints, biological versatility, developmental dissociability, and morphological integration. For evolutionary biology the representation problem has important implications: how is it that extant species acquired a genotype-phenotype map which allows improvement by mutation and selection? Is the genotype-phenotype map able to change in evolution? What are the selective forces, if any, that shape the genotype-phenotype map? We propose that the genotype-phenotype map can evolve by two main routes: epistatic mutations, or the creation of new genes. A common result for organismic design is modularity. By modularity we mean a genotype-phenotype map in which there are few pleiotropic effects among characters serving different functions, with pleiotropic effects falling mainly among characters that are part of a single functional complex. Such a design is expected to improve evolvability by limiting the interference between the adaptation of different functions. Several population genetic models are reviewed that are intended to explain the evolutionary origin of a modular design. While our current knowledge is insufficient to assess the plausibility of these models, they form the beginning of a framework for understanding the evolution of the genotype-phenotype map.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Deciphering the Palimpsest: Studying the Relationship Between Morphological Integration and Phenotypic Covariation.

              Organisms represent a complex arrangement of anatomical structures and individuated parts that must maintain functional associations through development. This integration of variation between functionally related body parts and the modular organization of development are fundamental determinants of their evolvability. This is because integration results in the expression of coordinated variation that can create preferred directions for evolutionary change, while modularity enables variation in a group of traits or regions to accumulate without deleterious effects on other aspects of the organism. Using our own work on both model systems (e.g., lab mice, avians) and natural populations of rodents and primates, we explore in this paper the relationship between patterns of phenotypic covariation and the developmental determinants of integration that those patterns are assumed to reflect. We show that integration cannot be reliably studied through phenotypic covariance patterns alone and argue that the relationship between phenotypic covariation and integration is obscured in two ways. One is the superimposition of multiple determinants of covariance in complex systems and the other is the dependence of covariation structure on variances in covariance-generating processes. As a consequence, we argue that the direct study of the developmental determinants of integration in model systems is necessary to fully interpret patterns of covariation in natural populations, to link covariation patterns to the processes that generate them, and to understand their significance for evolutionary explanation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                evargas-parra@amnh.org
                Journal
                Evol Dev
                Evol Dev
                10.1111/(ISSN)1525-142X
                EDE
                Evolution & Development
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1520-541X
                1525-142X
                16 September 2022
                November 2022
                : 24
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/ede.v24.6 )
                : 177-188
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Paleontology American Museum of Natural History New York New York USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence Ernesto E. Vargas‐Parra, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St, New York, NY 10024, USA.

                Email: evargas-parra@ 123456amnh.org

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4773-6811
                Article
                EDE12418
                10.1111/ede.12418
                9786538
                36111749
                97b937a1-5067-4875-a3fd-245b5d1f16ad
                © 2022 The Authors. Evolution & Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 06 July 2022
                : 25 February 2022
                : 18 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Pages: 12, Words: 6987
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:23.12.2022

                Developmental biology
                modularity,integration,trilobite,ordovician,morphometrics
                Developmental biology
                modularity, integration, trilobite, ordovician, morphometrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article