36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Family caregiver mistreatment of the elderly: prevalence of risk and associated factors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The detection of elder mistreatment is emerging as a public health priority; however, abusive behaviors exercised by caregivers are little known and rarely detected among primary health care professionals.

          This study aims to estimate the prevalence of risk of abuse against community-residing elderly with moderate to severe dependency whose caregivers are relatives. In addition, we aim to describe the association between such a risk and socio-demographic variables, cognitive and dependency state of the victim, and the scale of the caregiver’s anxiety, depression, and burden.

          Methods

          Cross-sectional study developed in 72 Primary Health Care teams from Barcelona, Spain. Participants were caregivers and their dependent care recipients ( N = 829). Home interviews included the Caregiver Abuse Screen (CASE); self-reported abuse from care recipient; activities of daily living and cognitive state of the care recipient; anxiety and depression in caregivers and Caregiver Burden Scale. The relationship prior to the dependency, positive aspects of caregiving, and social support for the caregiver were also assessed. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression with risk of abuse as dependent variable.

          Results

          Caregivers were mainly women (82.8%) with a mean age of 63.3 years. Caregivers and care recipients lived in the same household in 87.4% of cases, and 86.6% had enjoyed a good previous relationship. Care recipients were women (65.6%), with a mean age of 84.2 years, and 64.2% had moderate to severe cognitive impairment. CASE demonstrated a prevalence of 33.4% (95% CI: 30.3-36.7) of abuse risk by the caregiver. Logistic regression showed as statistically significant: caregiver burden (OR = 2.75; 95% CI: 1.74-4.33), caregiver anxiety (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.40-3.02), caregiver perception of aggressive behavior in the care recipient (OR = 7.24; 95% CI: 4.99-10.51), and a bad previous relationship (OR = 4.66; 95% CI: 1.25-17.4).

          Conclusions

          Prevalence of risk of abuse is high among family caregivers. Our study has found risk factors in family caregivers that are preventable to an extent, namely: anxiety and feelings of burden. It is essential to become aware of these risk factors and their causes to intervene and help primary as well secondary prevention.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Applied Logistic Regression

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review.

            to perform a systematic review of studies measuring the prevalence of elder abuse or neglect, either reported by older people themselves, or family and professional caregivers or investigated using objective measures. we conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple databases up to October 2006, supplemented by a search of the references of all relevant articles. Validity of studies was graded by two authors independently using a standardised checklist. forty-nine studies met our inclusion criteria, of which only seven used measures for which reliability and validity had been assessed. In the general population studies, 6% of older people reported significant abuse in the last month and 5.6% of couples reported physical violence in their relationship in the last year. In studies using valid instruments involving vulnerable elders, nearly a quarter reported significant levels of psychological abuse. Five per cent of family caregivers reported physical abuse towards care recipients with dementia in a year, and a third reported any significant abuse. Sixteen per cent of care home staff admitted significant psychological abuse. Rates of abuse recorded using objective measures (5%) or reported to home management or adult protective services (APS) (1-2%) were low. one in four vulnerable elders are at risk of abuse and only a small proportion of this is currently detected. Elders and family and professional caregivers are willing to report abuse and should be asked about it routinely. Valid, reliable measures and consensus on what constitutes an adequate standard for validity of abuse measures are needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Elder mistreatment in the United States: prevalence estimates from a nationally representative study.

              The National Social Life, Health and Aging Project is the first population-based, nationally representative study to ask older adults about their recent experience of mistreatment. This article provides estimates of mistreatment by family members and examines the association of mistreatment with demographic and health characteristics. We selected community-residing participants aged 57 to 85 using a multistage area probability design. Of those eligible, 3,005 participated in the study, for a weighted response rate of 75.5%. We asked respondents if in the past year they had experienced mistreatment in the following domains: verbal, financial, and physical. We asked those who reported mistreatment about their relationship to the person responsible. In all, 9% of older adults reported verbal mistreatment, 3.5% financial mistreatment, and 0.2% physical mistreatment by a family member. Odds of verbal mistreatment were higher for women and those with physical vulnerabilities and were lower for Latinos than for Whites. Odds of financial mistreatment were higher for African Americans and lower for Latinos than for Whites and were lower for those with a spouse or romantic partner than for those without partners. Few older adults report mistreatment by family members, with older adults quite insulated from physical mistreatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                0034-934824342 , forfila.bcn.ics@gencat.cat
                mcs@tramontis.net
                macabanas_ext@catsalut.cat
                pcegri.bcn.ics@gencat.cat
                amoleras@idiapjgol.org
                epujol@idiapjgol.org
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                22 January 2018
                22 January 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 167
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.452479.9, Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primaria Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), ; Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 587, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9127 6969, GRID grid.22061.37, Gerència Territorial Barcelona Ciutat. Institut Catala de la Salut, ; Balmes 22, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9127 6969, GRID grid.22061.37, Centre d’Atenció Primària Les Planes. Gerència Territorial Metropolitana Sud. Institut Catala de la Salut, ; 08970 Sant Joan Despí, Spain
                [4 ]Consorci Sanitari de Barcelona, Esteve Terradas, 30, 08023 Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9127 6969, GRID grid.22061.37, Centre d’Atenció Primària Sant Martí. Gerència Territorial Barcelona Ciutat. Institut Catala de la Salut, ; Fluvià, 211, 08020 Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ]GRID grid.7080.f, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ; 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2409-1731
                Article
                5067
                10.1186/s12889-018-5067-8
                5778739
                29357866
                99f397d6-0d2e-4f3a-9430-311b5faea94c
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 April 2017
                : 11 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004587, Instituto de Salud Carlos III;
                Award ID: PI06/1878
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Public health
                elder abuse,primary health care,caregivers,interpersonal relations,risk factors
                Public health
                elder abuse, primary health care, caregivers, interpersonal relations, risk factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article