30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does lithium reduce acute suicidal ideation and behavior? A protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of lithium plus Treatment As Usual (TAU) in patients with suicidal major depressive episode

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Lithium has proven suicide preventing effects in the long-term treatment of patients with affective disorders. Clinical evidence from case reports indicate that this effect may occur early on at the beginning of lithium treatment. The impact of lithium treatment on acute suicidal thoughts and/or behavior has not been systematically studied in a controlled trial. The primary objective of this confirmatory study is to determine the association between lithium therapy and acute suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behavior in inpatients with a major depressive episode (MDE, unipolar and bipolar disorder according to DSM IV criteria). The specific aim is to test the hypothesis that lithium plus treatment as usual (TAU), compared to placebo plus TAU, results in a significantly greater decrease in suicidal ideation and/or behavior over 5 weeks in inpatients with MDE.

          Methods/Design

          We initiated a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Patients with the diagnosis of a moderate to severe depressive episode and suicidal thoughts and/or suicidal behavior measured with the Sheehan-Suicidality-Tracking Scale (S-STS) will be randomly allocated to add lithium or placebo to their treatment as usual. Change in the clinician administered S-STS from the initial to the final visit will be the primary outcome.

          Discussion

          There is an urgent need to identify treatments that will acutely decrease suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behavior. The results of this study will demonstrate whether lithium reduces suicidal ideation and behavior within the first 5 weeks of treatment.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02039479

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.

          Randomized clinical trials that compare two treatments on a continuous outcome can be analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or a t-test approach. We present a method for the sample size calculation when ANCOVA is used. We derived an approximate sample size formula. Simulations were used to verify the accuracy of the formula and to improve the approximation for small trials. The sample size calculations are illustrated in a clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis. If the correlation between the outcome measured at baseline and at follow-up is rho, ANCOVA comparing groups of (1-rho(2))n subjects has the same power as t-test comparing groups of n subjects. When on the same data, ANCOVA is used instead of t-test, the precision of the treatment estimate is increased, and the length of the confidence interval is reduced by a factor 1-rho(2). ANCOVA may considerably reduce the number of patients required for a trial.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of bipolar disorders: update 2012 on the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder.

            These guidelines are based on a first edition that was published in 2004, and have been edited and updated with the available scientific evidence up to October 2012. Their purpose is to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence pertaining to the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder in adults. Material used for these guidelines are based on a systematic literature search using various data bases. Their scientific rigor was categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F) and different grades of recommendation to ensure practicability were assigned. Maintenance trial designs are complex and changed fundamentally over time; thus, it is not possible to give an overall recommendation for long-term treatment. Different scenarios have to be examined separately: Prevention of mania, depression, or an episode of any polarity, both in acute responders and in patients treated de novo. Treatment might differ in Bipolar II patients or Rapid cyclers, as well as in special subpopulations. We identified several medications preventive against new manic episodes, whereas the current state of research into the prevention of new depressive episodes is less satisfactory. Lithium continues to be the substance with the broadest base of evidence across treatment scenarios. Although major advances have been made since the first edition of this guideline in 2004, there are still areas of uncertainty, especially the prevention of depressive episodes and optimal long-term treatment of Bipolar II patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. III. Pharmacotherapy.

              In 2001, the Canadian Psychiatric Association and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) partnered to produce evidence-based clinical guidelines for the treatment of depressive disorders. A revision of these guidelines was undertaken by CANMAT in 2008-2009 to reflect advances in the field. The CANMAT guidelines are based on a question-answer format to enhance accessibility to clinicians. An evidence-based format was used with updated systematic reviews of the literature and recommendations were graded according to Level of Evidence using pre-defined criteria. Lines of Treatment were identified based on criteria that included Levels of Evidence and expert clinical support. This section on "Pharmacotherapy" is one of 5 guideline articles. Despite emerging data on efficacy and tolerability differences amongst newer antidepressants, variability in patient response precludes identification of specific first choice medications for all patients. All second-generation antidepressants have Level 1 evidence to support efficacy and tolerability and most are considered first-line treatments for MDD. First-generation tricyclic and monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressants are not the focus of these guidelines but generally are considered second- or third-line treatments. For inadequate or incomplete response, there is Level 1 evidence for switching strategies and for add-on strategies including lithium and atypical antipsychotics. Most of the evidence is based on trials for registration and may not reflect real-world effectiveness. Second-generation antidepressants are safe, effective and well tolerated treatments for MDD in adults. Evidence-based switching and add-on strategies can be used to optimize response in MDD that is inadequately responsive to monotherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ute.lewitzka@uniklinikum-dresden.de
                Burkhard.Jabs@khdn.de
                Matthias.Fuelle@khdn.de
                v.holthoff-detto@alexius.de
                georg.juckel@wkp-lwl.org
                idun.uhl@wkp-lwl.org
                sarah.kittel-schneider@kgu.de
                andreas.reif@kgu.de
                Christine.Reif-Leonhard@kgu.de
                Oliver.Gruber@medizin.uni-goettingen.de
                Barbara.Djawid@uniklinikum-dresden.de
                sarah.doucette@dal.ca
                robert.haussmann@uniklinikum-dresden.de
                Andrea.Pfennig@uniklinikum-dresden.de
                Philipp.Ritter@uniklinikum-dresden.de
                Joern.Conell@uniklinikum-dresden.de
                Emanuel.Severus@uniklinikum-dresden.de
                michael.bauer@uniklinikum-dresden.de
                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-244X
                19 May 2015
                19 May 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 117
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, D-01307 Germany
                [ ]Psychiatric Department of the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Neustadt, Dresden, Germany
                [ ]Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Alexianer Krankenhaus Hedwigshöhe, Berlin, Germany
                [ ]Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Prevention Medicine, LWL-University Clinic Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [ ]Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe-Universit, Frankfurt, Germany
                [ ]Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
                [ ]Coordination Centre for Clinical, Trials (KKS) Dresden, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden , Germany
                [ ]Department of Epidemiology Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                Article
                499
                10.1186/s12888-015-0499-5
                4458032
                25986590
                9a610f94-c82a-4179-b8ab-f2d09b87e5b5
                © Lewitzka et al. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 3 April 2015
                : 15 May 2015
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                randomized controlled trial,lithium,suicidal thoughts,suicidal behavior,affective disorders

                Comments

                Comment on this article