20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using Low-Cost Virtual Reality Simulation to Build Surgical Capacity for Cervical Cancer Treatment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          Worldwide, more than 80% of people diagnosed with cancer will require surgery during their disease course, but only 5% to 20% of low- and middle-income countries have access to safe, affordable, and timely surgery. Developing surgical oncology skills requires significant time and mentoring. Virtual reality (VR) simulators can reduce the time required to master surgical procedures but are prohibitively expensive. We sought to determine whether a VR simulator using low-cost computer gaming equipment could train novice surgeons in Africa to perform a virtual radical abdominal (open) hysterectomy (RAH).

          METHODS

          Our RAH VR simulator used the Oculus Rift (Oculus VR, Menlo Park, CA), a VR headset with hand controllers that costs less than $1,500. Surgical novices learned to perform five key steps of a virtual RAH. We measured and identified predictors of movement and time efficiency for the simulation.

          RESULTS

          Ten novice surgeons in Lusaka, Zambia, enrolled in the study. Movement and time efficiency greatly improved over time. Independent predictors of movement efficiency were number of simulations, surgical experience, and time since college graduation. Independent predictors of time efficiency were number of simulations, surgical experience, days between simulation sessions, age, sex, and an interaction between number of simulations and surgical experience.

          CONCLUSION

          Low-cost VR may be an effective tool to help surgical novices learn complex surgical oncology procedures. If learning to perform VR surgical procedures with low-cost hardware leads to faster mastery of surgical procedures in the operating room, low-cost VR may represent one of the solutions to increasing access to surgical cancer care globally.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

            BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery was adopted as an alternative to laparotomy (open surgery) for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer before high-quality evidence regarding its effect on survival was available. We sought to determine the effect of minimally invasive surgery on all-cause mortality among women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. METHODS We performed a cohort study involving women who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IA2 or IB1 cervical cancer during the 2010–2013 period at Commission on Cancer–accredited hospitals in the United States. The study used inverse probability of treatment propensity-score weighting. We also conducted an interrupted time-series analysis involving women who underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer during the 2000–2010 period, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database. RESULTS In the primary analysis, 1225 of 2461 women (49.8%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. Women treated with minimally invasive surgery were more often white, privately insured, and from ZIP Codes with higher socioeconomic status, had smaller, lower-grade tumors, and were more likely to have received a diagnosis later in the study period than women who underwent open surgery. Over a median follow-up of 45 months, the 4-year mortality was 9.1% among women who underwent minimally invasive surgery and 5.3% among those who underwent open surgery (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 2.22; P = 0.002 by the log-rank test). Before the adoption of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (i.e., in the 2000–2006 period), the 4-year relative survival rate among women who underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer remained stable (annual percentage change, 0.3%; 95% CI, −0.1 to 0.6). The adoption of minimally invasive surgery coincided with a decline in the 4-year relative survival rate of 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.4) per year after 2006 (P = 0.01 for change of trend). CONCLUSIONS In an epidemiologic study, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with shorter overall survival than open surgery among women with stage IA2 or IB1 cervical carcinoma. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Glob Oncol
                J Glob Oncol
                jgo
                jgo
                JGO
                Journal of Global Oncology
                American Society of Clinical Oncology
                2378-9506
                2019
                9 May 2019
                : 5
                : JGO.18.00263
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX
                [ 2 ]University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
                [ 3 ]University of Zambia, University Teaching Hospital–Women and Newborn Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
                [ 4 ]King’s College London, King’s Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Eric G. Bing, MD, PhD, MBA, Department of Applied Physiology and Wellness, Simmons School of Education and Human Development, and Department of Anthropology, Dedman College of Humanities and Sciences, Southern Methodist University, 3101 University Blvd, Dallas, TX 75205; e-mail: ebing@ 123456smu.edu .
                Article
                1800263
                10.1200/JGO.18.00263
                6550092
                31070982
                9a61e933-8054-483a-85db-293de9dc8775
                © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 01 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 7
                Categories
                , Cancer Prevention and Control
                , Gynecologic: Cervical Cancer
                , Gynecologic: Other Gynecologic Tumors
                , Health Services Research
                , Surgical Oncology
                Original Report
                Custom metadata
                v1

                Comments

                Comment on this article