7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The [4Fe‐4S] clusters of Rpo3 are key determinants in the post Rpo3/Rpo11 heterodimer formation of RNA polymerase in Methanosarcina acetivorans

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Subunits Rpo3 and Rpb3/ AC40 of RNA polymerase ( RNAP) from many archaea and some eukaryotes, respectively, contain a ferredoxin‐like domain ( FLD) predicted to bind one or two [4Fe‐4S] clusters postulated to play a role in regulating the assembly of RNAP. To test this hypothesis, the two [4Fe‐4S] cluster Rpo3 from Methanosarcina acetivorans was modified to generate variants that lack the FLD or each [4Fe‐4S] cluster. Viability of gene replacement mutants revealed that neither the FLD nor the ability of the FLD to bind either [4Fe‐4S] cluster is essential. Nevertheless, each mutant demonstrated impaired growth due to significantly lower RNAP activity when compared to wild type. Affinity purification of tagged Rpo3 variants from M. acetivorans strains revealed that neither the FLD nor each [4Fe‐4S] cluster is required for the formation of a Rpo3/11 heterodimer, the first step in the assembly of RNAP. However, the association of the Rpo3/11 heterodimer with catalytic subunits Rpo2′ and Rpo1″ was diminished by the removal of the FLD and each cluster, with the loss of cluster 1 having a more substantial effect than the loss of cluster 2. These results reveal that the FLD and [4Fe‐4S] clusters, particularly cluster 1, are key determinants in the post Rpo3/11 heterodimer assembly of RNAP in M. acetivorans.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

          For the past 25 years NIH Image and ImageJ software have been pioneers as open tools for the analysis of scientific images. We discuss the origins, challenges and solutions of these two programs, and how their history can serve to advise and inform other software projects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation.

            Most methanogenic archaea can reduce CO(2) with H(2) to methane, and it is generally assumed that the reactions and mechanisms of energy conservation that are involved are largely the same in all methanogens. However, this does not take into account the fact that methanogens with cytochromes have considerably higher growth yields and threshold concentrations for H(2) than methanogens without cytochromes. These and other differences can be explained by the proposal outlined in this Review that in methanogens with cytochromes, the first and last steps in methanogenesis from CO(2) are coupled chemiosmotically, whereas in methanogens without cytochromes, these steps are energetically coupled by a cytoplasmic enzyme complex that mediates flavin-based electron bifurcation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Early bioenergetic evolution

              Life is the harnessing of chemical energy in such a way that the energy-harnessing device makes a copy of itself. This paper outlines an energetically feasible path from a particular inorganic setting for the origin of life to the first free-living cells. The sources of energy available to early organic synthesis, early evolving systems and early cells stand in the foreground, as do the possible mechanisms of their conversion into harnessable chemical energy for synthetic reactions. With regard to the possible temporal sequence of events, we focus on: (i) alkaline hydrothermal vents as the far-from-equilibrium setting, (ii) the Wood–Ljungdahl (acetyl-CoA) pathway as the route that could have underpinned carbon assimilation for these processes, (iii) biochemical divergence, within the naturally formed inorganic compartments at a hydrothermal mound, of geochemically confined replicating entities with a complexity below that of free-living prokaryotes, and (iv) acetogenesis and methanogenesis as the ancestral forms of carbon and energy metabolism in the first free-living ancestors of the eubacteria and archaebacteria, respectively. In terms of the main evolutionary transitions in early bioenergetic evolution, we focus on: (i) thioester-dependent substrate-level phosphorylations, (ii) harnessing of naturally existing proton gradients at the vent–ocean interface via the ATP synthase, (iii) harnessing of Na+ gradients generated by H+/Na+ antiporters, (iv) flavin-based bifurcation-dependent gradient generation, and finally (v) quinone-based (and Q-cycle-dependent) proton gradient generation. Of those five transitions, the first four are posited to have taken place at the vent. Ultimately, all of these bioenergetic processes depend, even today, upon CO2 reduction with low-potential ferredoxin (Fd), generated either chemosynthetically or photosynthetically, suggesting a reaction of the type ‘reduced iron → reduced carbon’ at the beginning of bioenergetic evolution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dlessner@uark.edu
                Journal
                Microbiologyopen
                Microbiologyopen
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-8827
                MBO3
                MicrobiologyOpen
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-8827
                25 August 2016
                February 2017
                : 6
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/mbo3.2016.6.issue-1 )
                : e00399
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Arkansas Fayetteville ARUSA
                [ 2 ] Department of Microbiology and Plant BiologyUniversity of Oklahoma Norman OKUSA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Daniel J Lessner,

                Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.

                Email: dlessner@ 123456uark.edu

                Article
                MBO3399
                10.1002/mbo3.399
                5300874
                27557794
                9b869ccf-d573-4443-ab80-f395ea4cd49d
                © 2016 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 May 2016
                : 25 July 2016
                : 28 July 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 7, Pages: 12, Words: 10282
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of General Medical Sciences
                Award ID: P30 GM103450
                Funded by: National Science Foundation
                Award ID: MCB1121292
                Funded by: NASA Exobiology
                Award ID: NNX12AR60G
                Funded by: Arkansas Biosciences Institute
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                mbo3399
                February 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.0.6 mode:remove_FC converted:09.02.2017

                Microbiology & Virology
                anaerobes,archaea,iron–sulfur cluster,transcription
                Microbiology & Virology
                anaerobes, archaea, iron–sulfur cluster, transcription

                Comments

                Comment on this article