3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of machine-learning algorithms to aid in the early detection of leptospirosis in dogs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Leptospirosis is a life-threatening, zoonotic disease with various clinical presentations, including renal injury, hepatic injury, pancreatitis, and pulmonary hemorrhage. With prompt recognition of the disease and treatment, 90% of infected dogs have a positive outcome. Therefore, rapid, early diagnosis of leptospirosis is crucial. Testing for Leptospira-specific serum antibodies using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) lacks sensitivity early in the disease process, and diagnosis can take >2 wk because of the need to demonstrate a rise in titer. We applied machine-learning algorithms to clinical variables from the first day of hospitalization to create machine-learning prediction models (MLMs). The models incorporated patient signalment, clinicopathologic data (CBC, serum chemistry profile, and urinalysis = blood work [BW] model), with or without a MAT titer obtained at patient intake (=BW + MAT model). The models were trained with data from 91 dogs with confirmed leptospirosis and 322 dogs without leptospirosis. Once trained, the models were tested with a cohort of dogs not included in the model training (9 leptospirosis-positive and 44 leptospirosis-negative dogs), and performance was assessed. Both models predicted leptospirosis in the test set with 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 70.1–100%). Specificity was 90.9% (95% CI: 78.8–96.4%) and 93.2% (95% CI: 81.8–97.7%) for the BW and BW + MAT models, respectively. Our MLMs outperformed traditional acute serologic screening and can provide accurate early screening for the probable diagnosis of leptospirosis in dogs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Conference Proceedings: not found

          A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            2010 ACVIM Small Animal Consensus Statement on Leptospirosis: Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Treatment, and Prevention

            This report offers a consensus opinion on the diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment, and prevention of leptospirosis in dogs, an important zoonosis. Clinical signs of leptospirosis in dogs relate to development of renal disease, hepatic disease, uveitis, and pulmonary hemorrhage. Disease may follow periods of high rainfall, and can occur in dogs roaming in proximity to water sources, farm animals, or wildlife, or dogs residing in suburban environments. Diagnosis is based on acute and convalescent phase antibody titers by the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), with or without use of polymerase chain reaction assays. There is considerable interlaboratory variation in MAT results, and the MAT does not accurately predict the infecting serogroup. The recommended treatment for optimal clearance of the organism from renal tubules is doxycycline, 5 mg/kg PO q12h, for 14 days. Annual vaccination can prevent leptospirosis caused by serovars included in the vaccine and is recommended for dogs at risk of infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A century of Leptospira strain typing.

              Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease with high mortality and morbidity rates in humans and animals throughout the world. Since the discovery of Leptospira, the causal agent of leptospirosis, a century ago, this spirochete has been isolated from the environment and a wide spectrum of animals and classified into serogroups and serovars as a function of antigenic determinants. Modern technology has greatly improved laboratory procedures, particularly those for the detection, identification and typing of epidemiologic strains. In this review, we describe "classical" serotyping methods, followed by a description of genotyping and post-genomic typing methods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Vet Diagn Invest
                J Vet Diagn Invest
                VDI
                spvdi
                Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation : Official Publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1040-6387
                1943-4936
                21 May 2022
                July 2022
                21 May 2022
                : 34
                : 4
                : 612-621
                Affiliations
                [1-10406387221096781]Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [2-10406387221096781]School of Veterinary Medicine, and Department of Mathematics, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [3-10406387221096781]School of Veterinary Medicine, and Department of Mathematics, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [4-10406387221096781]William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [5-10406387221096781]William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [6-10406387221096781]William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [7-10406387221096781]William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [8-10406387221096781]William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [9-10406387221096781]School of Veterinary Medicine, and Department of Mathematics, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                [10-10406387221096781]Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
                Author notes
                [*] [1 ]Krystle L. Reagan, Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California–Davis, 1 Garrod Dr, Davis, CA 95616, USA. kreagan@ 123456ucdavis.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3426-6352
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7084-7678
                Article
                10.1177_10406387221096781
                10.1177/10406387221096781
                9266510
                35603565
                9bd947bb-6c1f-4b2e-b734-8789a7300e0b
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: national science foundation, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001;
                Award ID: NSF-DMS-1737943, NSF DMS-2027248, and NSF CCF-193
                Categories
                Full Scientific Reports
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                artificial intelligence,dogs,infection,kidney,leptospira
                artificial intelligence, dogs, infection, kidney, leptospira

                Comments

                Comment on this article