8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lenses and levels: the why, what and how of measuring health system drivers of women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health with a governance focus

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Health systems are critical for health outcomes as they underpin intervention coverage and quality, promote users’ rights and intervene on the social determinants of health. Governance is essential for health system endeavours as it mobilises and coordinates a multiplicity of actors and interests to realise common goals. The inherently social, political and contextualised nature of governance, and health systems more broadly, has implications for measurement, including how the health of women, children and adolescents health is viewed and assessed, and for whom. Three common lenses, each with their own views of power dynamics in policy and programme implementation, include a service delivery lens aimed at scaling effective interventions, a societal lens oriented to empowering people with rights to effect change and a systems lens concerned with creating enabling environments for adaptive learning. We illustrate the implications of each lens for the why, what and how of measuring health system drivers across micro, meso and macro health systems levels, through three examples (digital health, maternal and perinatal death surveillance and review, and multisectoral action for adolescent health). Appreciating these underpinnings of measuring health systems and governance drivers of the health of women, children and adolescents is essential for a holistic learning and action agenda that engages a wider range of stakeholders, which includes, but also goes beyond, indicator-based measurement. Without a broadening of approaches to measurement and the types of research partnerships involved, continued investments in the health of women, children and adolescents will fall short.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

          Background Implementation science has progressed towards increased use of theoretical approaches to provide better understanding and explanation of how and why implementation succeeds or fails. The aim of this article is to propose a taxonomy that distinguishes between different categories of theories, models and frameworks in implementation science, to facilitate appropriate selection and application of relevant approaches in implementation research and practice and to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue among implementation researchers. Discussion Theoretical approaches used in implementation science have three overarching aims: describing and/or guiding the process of translating research into practice (process models); understanding and/or explaining what influences implementation outcomes (determinant frameworks, classic theories, implementation theories); and evaluating implementation (evaluation frameworks). Summary This article proposes five categories of theoretical approaches to achieve three overarching aims. These categories are not always recognized as separate types of approaches in the literature. While there is overlap between some of the theories, models and frameworks, awareness of the differences is important to facilitate the selection of relevant approaches. Most determinant frameworks provide limited “how-to” support for carrying out implementation endeavours since the determinants usually are too generic to provide sufficient detail for guiding an implementation process. And while the relevance of addressing barriers and enablers to translating research into practice is mentioned in many process models, these models do not identify or systematically structure specific determinants associated with implementation success. Furthermore, process models recognize a temporal sequence of implementation endeavours, whereas determinant frameworks do not explicitly take a process perspective of implementation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality.

            Why do some global health initiatives receive priority from international and national political leaders whereas others receive little attention? To analyse this question we propose a framework consisting of four categories: the strength of the actors involved in the initiative, the power of the ideas they use to portray the issue, the nature of the political contexts in which they operate, and characteristics of the issue itself. We apply this framework to the case of a global initiative to reduce maternal mortality, which was launched in 1987. We undertook archival research and interviewed people connected with the initiative, using a process-tracing method that is commonly employed in qualitative research. We report that despite two decades of effort the initiative remains in an early phase of development, hampered by difficulties in all these categories. However, the initiative's 20th year, 2007, presents opportunities to build political momentum. To generate political priority, advocates will need to address several challenges, including the creation of effective institutions to guide the initiative and the development of a public positioning of the issue to convince political leaders to act. We use the framework and case study to suggest areas for future research on the determinants of political priority for global health initiatives, which is a subject that has attracted much speculation but little scholarship.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Framing the Questions

              In the first of a series of articles addressing the current challenges and opportunities for the development of Health Policy & Systems Research (HPSR), Kabir Sheikh and colleagues lay out the main questions vexing the field.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2019
                24 June 2019
                : 4
                : Suppl 4 , Measurement of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition
                : e001316
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentSchool of Public Health , University of the Western Cape , Cape Town, South Africa
                [2 ] departmentSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine , University of CapeTown , Cape Town, Maryland
                [3 ] departmentPolitical Affairs and Strategy , UNAIDS , Geneva, Switzerland
                [4 ] World Bank , Washington, District of Columbia, USA
                [5 ] World Health Organisation , Geneva, Switzerland
                [6 ] departmentSchool of Public Health , Harvard University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [7 ] Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia , Lima, Peru
                [8 ] United Nations High Commission for Human Rights , Geneva, Switzerland
                [9 ] World Health Organisation , Phnom Penh, Cambodia
                [10 ] departmentDepartment of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London, UK
                [11 ] departmentCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa , University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
                [12 ] departmentComputational Biology , University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
                [13 ] National Health Systems Resource Centre , New Delhi, India
                [14 ] departmentCommunity Health Sciences , Aga Khan University Faculty of Health Sciences , Karachi, Pakistan
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Asha George; asgeorge@ 123456uwc.ac.za
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5968-1424
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-7240
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0057-121X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7620-9247
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-1828
                Article
                bmjgh-2018-001316
                10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001316
                6590975
                31297255
                9c313770-06bb-441a-b24c-e1981c32d6b9
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History
                : 16 November 2018
                : 16 January 2019
                : 15 February 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Funded by: National Research Fund Department of Science and Technology South Africa;
                Categories
                Analysis
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                health systems,governance,measurement,rights,power,epistemology
                health systems, governance, measurement, rights, power, epistemology

                Comments

                Comment on this article