1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Phosphate Depletion in Opossum Kidney Cells: Apical But Not Basolateral or Transepithelial Adaptions of Pi Transport

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Monolayers of opossum kidney (OK) cells are widely used as models for the renal proximal tubule. OK cells adapt to phosphate (Pi) depletion by increasing their capacity for apical and basolateral Na<sup>+</sup>-dependent Pi uptake. Because NMR-visible cell Pi was found to be decreased in Pi-deprived kidney cells, we suggested that up-regulation of basolateral Pi efflux also occurs during adaptation to Pi deprivation [ American Journal of Physiol 1994;267:C915–919]. In order to test this hypothesis, we measured the cell Pi pool, basolateral Pi efflux and transepithelial Pi fluxes in OK cells grown on permeable plastic filters, exposed overnight to solutions containing either 0.5 m M (deprived) or 2.0 m M (replete) Pi or <sup>32</sup>Pi. Following steady state or acute loading with <sup>32</sup>Pi, the specific activity (SA) of cell Pi, the cell Pi pool and the basolateral efflux of <sup>32</sup>Pi were measured. In the steady state, a 2-fold increase in Pi uptake sustained the intracellular Pi pool at 85% of the control level (30 ± 5 nmol/mg) in spite of a decrease in extracellular Pi from 2 to 0.5 m M. When the extracellular Pi was acutely (1 h) reduced to 0.1 m M, the cell Pi pool decreased (to 3 ± 1 nmol/mg) both in cells previously adapted overnight to either 0.5 or to 2 m M Pi (p >0.3). The rates of absolute and fractional basolateral washout of cell <sup>32</sup>Pi after 1 h loading with 0.1 m M<sup>32</sup>Pi were similar in cells adapted to 0.5 compared to 2 m M Pi. This indicates that Pi depletion did not affect the effective permeability of the basolateral membranes to Pi. Adaptation for 16 h to 0.5 compared to 2 m M Pi did not alter the rate of net transepithelial transport of 0.1 m M Pi from the apical to the basal compartment but reduced (p < 0.05) the unidirectional fluxes of both <sup>32</sup>Pi and <sup>14</sup>C-mannitol. An insufficient driving force (unchanged or low Pi concentration in the transport pool, low electrical or coupled-anion gradients) and a constant effective basolateral Pi permeability must have limited basolateral Pi efflux in cells exposed to 0.1 m M Pi. Thus, in OK cells grown on plastic support there are no adaptive increases in either basolateral Pi efflux, or in transcellular and paracellular Pi transport, in response to Pi depletion. Adaptations are limited to increases in apical and basolateral sodium-dependent Pi uptakes that can maintain the cell Pi pool as long as apical Pi is not too low (≧0.5 m M). The OK cells adapt to low Pi concentrations conserving cell Pi but not increasing basolateral Pi efflux nor transepithelial Pi transport.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          EXN
          Nephron Exp Nephrol
          10.1159/issn.1660-2129
          Cardiorenal Medicine
          S. Karger AG
          1660-2129
          2001
          2001
          27 June 2001
          : 9
          : 4
          : 258-264
          Affiliations
          aDepartment of Physiology, Kuwait University, School of Medicine, Kuwait City, Kuwait and bDepartment of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, N.Y., USA
          Article
          52620 Exp Nephrol 2001;9:258–264
          10.1159/000052620
          11423725
          © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Figures: 4, Tables: 1, References: 17, Pages: 7
          Product
          Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/52620
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article