376
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      An integrated pan‐tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets

      1 , 1 , 1 ,   2 , 3 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 1 , 14 , 12 , 15 , 16 , 2 , 17 , 14 , 14 , 11 , 18 , 2 , 19 , 11 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 22 , 23 , 12 , 21 , 24
      Global Change Biology
      Wiley
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We combined two existing datasets of vegetation aboveground biomass (AGB) (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2011, 9899; Nature Climate Change, 2, 2012, 182) into a pan-tropical AGB map at 1-km resolution using an independent reference dataset of field observations and locally calibrated high-resolution biomass maps, harmonized and upscaled to 14 477 1-km AGB estimates. Our data fusion approach uses bias removal and weighted linear averaging that incorporates and spatializes the biomass patterns indicated by the reference data. The method was applied independently in areas (strata) with homogeneous error patterns of the input (Saatchi and Baccini) maps, which were estimated from the reference data and additional covariates. Based on the fused map, we estimated AGB stock for the tropics (23.4 N-23.4 S) of 375 Pg dry mass, 9-18% lower than the Saatchi and Baccini estimates. The fused map also showed differing spatial patterns of AGB over large areas, with higher AGB density in the dense forest areas in the Congo basin, Eastern Amazon and South-East Asia, and lower values in Central America and in most dry vegetation areas of Africa than either of the input maps. The validation exercise, based on 2118 estimates from the reference dataset not used in the fusion process, showed that the fused map had a RMSE 15-21% lower than that of the input maps and, most importantly, nearly unbiased estimates (mean bias 5 Mg dry mass ha(-1) vs. 21 and 28 Mg ha(-1) for the input maps). The fusion method can be applied at any scale including the policy-relevant national level, where it can provide improved biomass estimates by integrating existing regional biomass maps as input maps and additional, country-specific reference datasets.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

          The terrestrial carbon sink has been large in recent decades, but its size and location remain uncertain. Using forest inventory data and long-term ecosystem carbon studies, we estimate a total forest sink of 2.4 ± 0.4 petagrams of carbon per year (Pg C year(-1)) globally for 1990 to 2007. We also estimate a source of 1.3 ± 0.7 Pg C year(-1) from tropical land-use change, consisting of a gross tropical deforestation emission of 2.9 ± 0.5 Pg C year(-1) partially compensated by a carbon sink in tropical forest regrowth of 1.6 ± 0.5 Pg C year(-1). Together, the fluxes comprise a net global forest sink of 1.1 ± 0.8 Pg C year(-1), with tropical estimates having the largest uncertainties. Our total forest sink estimate is equivalent in magnitude to the terrestrial sink deduced from fossil fuel emissions and land-use change sources minus ocean and atmospheric sinks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical forests.

              The response of terrestrial vegetation to a globally changing environment is central to predictions of future levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The role of tropical forests is critical because they are carbon-dense and highly productive. Inventory plots across Amazonia show that old-growth forests have increased in carbon storage over recent decades, but the response of one-third of the world's tropical forests in Africa is largely unknown owing to an absence of spatially extensive observation networks. Here we report data from a ten-country network of long-term monitoring plots in African tropical forests. We find that across 79 plots (163 ha) above-ground carbon storage in live trees increased by 0.63 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1) between 1968 and 2007 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-0.94; mean interval, 1987-96). Extrapolation to unmeasured forest components (live roots, small trees, necromass) and scaling to the continent implies a total increase in carbon storage in African tropical forest trees of 0.34 Pg C yr(-1) (CI, 0.15-0.43). These reported changes in carbon storage are similar to those reported for Amazonian forests per unit area, providing evidence that increasing carbon storage in old-growth forests is a pan-tropical phenomenon. Indeed, combining all standardized inventory data from this study and from tropical America and Asia together yields a comparable figure of 0.49 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1) (n = 156; 562 ha; CI, 0.29-0.66; mean interval, 1987-97). This indicates a carbon sink of 1.3 Pg C yr(-1) (CI, 0.8-1.6) across all tropical forests during recent decades. Taxon-specific analyses of African inventory and other data suggest that widespread changes in resource availability, such as increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, may be the cause of the increase in carbon stocks, as some theory and models predict.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Change Biology
                Glob Change Biol
                Wiley
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                April 2016
                January 10 2016
                April 2016
                : 22
                : 4
                : 1406-1420
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Geo‐Information Wageningen University Droevendaalsesteeg 3 6708PB Wageningen The Netherlands
                [2 ]School of Geography University of Leeds University Road Leeds West Yorkshire LS2 9JZ UK
                [3 ]Department of Geography University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT UK
                [4 ]Carnegie Institution for Science 260 Panama St. Stanford CA 94305 USA
                [5 ]Joint Remote Sensing Research Program The University of Queensland Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia
                [6 ]Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation Remote Sensing Centre GPO Box 5078 Brisbane Qld 4001 Australia
                [7 ]Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Harvard University 26 Oxford St Cambridge MA 02138 USA
                [8 ]Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 3AB UK
                [9 ]Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Bush Estate Penicuik Midlothian EH26 0QB UK
                [10 ]FRM Ingenierie 60 rue Henri Fabre 34130 Mauguio – Grand Montpellier France
                [11 ]Institute of Geography The University of Edinburgh Drummond Street Edinburgh EH8 9XP UK
                [12 ]Isotope Bioscience Laboratory Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Ghent University Coupure Links 653 B‐9000 Gent Belgium
                [13 ]ECOSUR‐Campeche Av. Rancho Polígono 2A, Parque Industrial Lerma Campeche CP 24500 México
                [14 ]School of Geography and the Environment University of Oxford South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QY UK
                [15 ]Laboratory for Wood Biology and Xylarium Royal Museum for Central Africa Leuvensesteenweg 13 3080 Tervuren Belgium
                [16 ]The RSPB Centre for Conservation Science The Lodge Potton Road Sandy Bedfordshire SG19 2DL UK
                [17 ]Centre for Ecosystem Science The University of New South Wales Sydney 2052 NSW Australia
                [18 ]Universidade Estadual de Campinas Rua Monteiro Lobato 255 Campinas SP CEP 13083‐970 Brazil
                [19 ]SarVision Agro Business Park 10 6708 PW Wageningen The Netherlands
                [20 ]Universiti Brunei Darussalam Jln Tungku Link Gadong BE1410 Brunei Darussalam Brunei
                [21 ]Center for International Forestry Research PO Box 0113 BOCBD Bogor 16000 Indonesia
                [22 ]Centro Euro‐Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici Iafes Division via Pacinotti 5 Viterbo Italy
                [23 ]Department of Innovation of Biological Systems Tuscia University Via S. Camillo de Lellis Viterbo Italy
                [24 ]Centre for Biological Sciences the University of Southampton Highfield Campus Southampton SO17 1BJ UK
                Article
                10.1111/gcb.13139
                26499288
                9d826161-55f2-4b9f-8edd-2a7698a48058
                © 2016

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article